Jump to content


Are HFC Desperate?


121o121
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6194 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just to put this to rest once and for all, the reason they keep contacting you is because HFC do not accept 'new customers'. They're business id driven through taking existing customers (introduced through our retail partners) and increasing the amount they are indebted to us.

 

For example - you take out a £700 TV retail agreement for curries.

 

Your details are then passed to the nearest branch who solicit you and entice you into a consolidation loan so...

 

You pay off curries, 2 credit cards and a store card totalling 6000 for example.

 

You now owe HFC 6k

 

3/6 months down the line the leads are recycled so we call you to find out if we can 'better' the service you have, ie entice you into further lending.

 

There may be some valid points about signed credit agreements going missing, but trust me, as an ex employee the organisation is so disjointed, if they didn't have a signed credit agreement they wouldn't know anyway.

 

The only reason (in 99%) of cases is to increase your indebtness to the company as surprise surpise that's how they (a money lender) make money.

 

Hope that answers some of the questions that have been asked on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just to put this to rest once and for all, the reason they keep contacting you is because HFC do not accept 'new customers'. They're business id driven through taking existing customers (introduced through our retail partners) and increasing the amount they are indebted to us.

 

For example - you take out a £700 TV retail agreement for curries.

 

Your details are then passed to the nearest branch who solicit you and entice you into a consolidation loan so...

 

You pay off curries, 2 credit cards and a store card totalling 6000 for example.

 

You now owe HFC 6k

 

3/6 months down the line the leads are recycled so we call you to find out if we can 'better' the service you have, ie entice you into further lending.

 

There may be some valid points about signed credit agreements going missing, but trust me, as an ex employee the organisation is so disjointed, if they didn't have a signed credit agreement they wouldn't know anyway.

 

The only reason (in 99%) of cases is to increase your indebtness to the company as surprise surpise that's how they (a money lender) make money.

 

Hope that answers some of the questions that have been asked on here.

 

 

As an ex-employee myself, I can confirm Dirty_Dog's post is completely true.

 

New customers are accepted, but very rarely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input guys!

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

have we all visited marbles.com

 

Welcome to marbles.com

 

it says

 

 

blank.gifb_login.gif t_welcome.gif As of 12th April 2007 we will no longer be accepting any new applications for the marbles credit card. If you are an existing customer, you can continue to log into your account using the "my account" button on the left of this page. m_clear.jpgblank.gif if (cashback =="Y") { document.write(spend_Cashb); } If you are an existing marbles cardholder, you can continue to access the following cardholder benefits:

Safe Shopping Promise and

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes we have rumbled THEM

 

HFC History

 

HFC Bank was established in 1973 as the UK arm and wholly-owned subsidiary of Household International Inc, one of the largest independent consumer finance businesses in the United States.

In the UK, we have adapted and moulded ourselves over the last 30+ years to ensure we have remained at the forefront of consumer finance. Initiatives such as being the first high street lender to open on a Saturday and having children´s play areas in our branches have helped keep us ahead of the pack.

In 1998, HFC Bank merged with Beneficial Bank resulting in a new bank in terms of scale, size and opportunity. This merger was a significant milestone in our history - expanding our market presence and improving our growth potential.

In March 2003 both Household International Inc. and HFC Bank Ltd became part of the HSBC Group. Subsequently HFC Bank has become a limited company.

 

AND HFC HAVE BINNED ALL THE PAPERWORK !!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/post-603698.html

 

So won't this then apply?

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft020.pdf

 

On page 11 in the 'Points to Note' it states:

An ‘individual’ may be a sole trader or a partnership as well as an ordinary

customer. On the other hand, a limited company can never be ‘an individual’;

and an agreement relating to credit provided, goods hired, leased, rented or

bailed to a limited company can therefore never, in normal circumstances,

be a regulated agreement.

 

Thought this may be of relevance.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So won't this then apply?

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft020.pdf

 

On page 11 in the 'Points to Note' it states:

An ‘individual’ may be a sole trader or a partnership as well as an ordinary

customer. On the other hand, a limited company can never be ‘an individual’;

and an agreement relating to credit provided, goods hired, leased, rented or

bailed to a limited company can therefore never, in normal circumstances,

be a regulated agreement.

 

Thought this may be of relevance.

 

 

This actually means that if HFC Bank Ltd were to enter into a contract where credit was provided to them, they would be defined as a limited company and therefore the Consumer Credit Act does not normally apply to said contract.

 

Where HFC provide credit to an individual, then the CCA does normally apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thanks. I didnt read it properly and only realised yesterday lol. :rolleyes: :o

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I asked for a settlement figure from HFC it came to almost as much as my owed balance. When I questioned this I was told that they add on the interest that would have been paid had I continued to pay monthly and then deduct the 20% settlement discount. I've just finished one agreement with them and have a few months to go with another. Never again will I use thiss bunch of clowns to finance anything. 29% APR? I don't know how they get away with it.

A+L S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 28th July. Statements rec'd 01 Sept. Letter requesting repayment of £4,979 sent 18/09 MCOL sent 15th Nov £6389.57. Cheque received £6425.54 4th Dec.:D

MBNA S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 28th July, promised reply by 28th August. Cheque rec'd £250 31 Aug.:confused: . 2nd letter sent 7 sept for rest of charges to be returned. £243 rec'd 28th Oct:D

CCA sent 1st Credit 11th August, reply 15th Aug

Request for repayment Rooftop Mortgages for £1095, reply saying no on 17th Aug.

Still to come: Cap. One, Time retail, HFC Bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hanen't you erer heard of Vanquis??? 59.9% is about right, whatever your credit history. If you're lucky you might get 46.6%... lol

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hanen't you erer heard of Vanquis??? 59.9% is about right, whatever your credit history. If you're lucky you might get 46.6%... lol

 

Provident Personal Credit have done APR's which are near on 200%. The largest I've seen was 176.5%. Thing is, these are tiny loans - £50 to £100. So the rate seems massive, whereas the actual interest charged in £'s is not. These are also doorstep lending and collecting - very high risk and therefore very high rate. I'm not sure if this company is still going though - it was over 7 years ago that a client showed me the contract.

 

The biggest risk to banks though is not poor paying customers, it's fraud. But that's another topic entirely.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...