Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

capquest cca CitiCard non compliance please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6289 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

i sent to capquest for my cca on 8/1/07 for a debt they purchased from citicard

 

 

i received a reply from them on 12/1/07 saying account would be placed on hold for 28 days whilst they obtain the required information,

 

 

i received a further letter today 10/2/07 stating they have requested this info directly from citicard and are awaiting a response,

and will contact me within 28days, as they have purchased the debt from citicard

(confimed by letter and s.a.r and the letter sent from them states DEBT PURCHASED FROM: CITICARD)

 

 

they are now the creditiors so should they not have bought the cca and rights of assignment from citicard

when the debt was sold to them and not need to contact citi as the debt is no longer citis problem?

 

please anybody help

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is pretty typical that these companies buy the debt without a copy of the

original agreement. However they will have a deed of assignment-it's just

that it is not part of a CCA requirement.

 

As it stands, Capquest are already in default as they should have sent the documents by the 26th January. They will have committed a criminal offence if they still haven't delivered by the 27th February.

 

So just keep quiet and let them commit the offence. Once that's done, they require a Court Order to reinstate the debt. they will be unlikely to do that

since they first face being charged with the offence and a large fine [probably more than your debt].

 

So just keep quiet, retain all correspondence and hope they do not produce

the required items by the end of this month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My Wife Has Received A Threatening Phone Call From Ruthbridge Over A Citicard Debt That Was Purchased First By Dlc And Now Ruthbridge, Sent Dlc Cca Request On 16th Jan No Reply So Obviously Didnt Have It And They Have Then Sold The Debt On To Ruthbridge What Can You Do About It? Do I Have To Resend Cca Request To These Arrogant Horrible People

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My Wife Has Received A Threatening Phone Call From Ruthbridge Over A Citicard Debt That Was Purchased First By Dlc And Now Ruthbridge, Sent Dlc Cca Request On 16th Jan No Reply So Obviously Didnt Have It And They Have Then Sold The Debt On To Ruthbridge What Can You Do About It? Do I Have To Resend Cca Request To These Arrogant Horrible People

 

Yes - are you caliming back charges on this?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we havent claimed back charges,

 

I would suggest that you send off an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to Citi and work out how much these are, and start the reclaiming process, but be aware that Citi make it a long old slog to reclaim from them - see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/citicards/

 

but in the majority of the cases the charges have been approx 75% of the debt.

 

should i make ruth bridge aware of the fact dlc failed to supply cca request? and can DCAs not just keep passing these debts around once they receive a cca request to avoid complying

thanks

 

Up to you really - but they do keep on passing the info on to other DCA's. I would ask the creditor direct for the agreement - if they don't have it then no one can collect the debt!

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wrote to capquest informing them of their non compliance (12 + 30 days) got a letter this morning saying

 

CAPQUEST DEBT RECOVERY

ACCOUNT NO *****************

DEBT PURCHASED FROM CITICARD

 

WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR CORRESPONDENCE.

 

PLEASE FIND RETURNED YOUR £1.00 FEE FOR A COPY OF AGREEMENT REQUEST WHICH WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN FROM CITICARD.

 

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ABOVE ACCOUNT IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING RETURNED TO CITICARD

 

as they have purchased the debt which this clearly states and also states the same on my citi statements when i got my SAR it surely no longer has anything to do with citi. Also my experian file states capquest issued a default on the account is this legal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm having the same problem with other DCAs.

 

it seems to be that when confronted they use this excuse of sending back to the creditor to get out of it.

 

i don't think banks sell the debts for pennies and then buy them back if the DCA wants it, that is a no-win situation for the DCA and risky for the bank.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

keep us updated!

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You must not stand for the default being registered with credit reference agencies.

 

Write Capquest a LBA demanding they remove the illegal default notice within 14 days. When they don't comply (and they won't ) you have a number of options 1) written complaint to Information Commisioner 2) Court Action- file an N1 stating default is unsubstantiated and claim compensation for distress. If they do not have CCA which they don't, they haven't a leg to stand on....You could also write to Experian but in my experience this is the least effective option.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...