Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

eBuyer.com


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been using this company for a few years now - generally anything to do with computers is cheapest on here and gets delivered quickly - sometimes sooner than expected (costs money to keep stuff in a warehouse - get it out quick!). However, this is all at the cost of customer services if anything goes wrong.

 

I bought a computer caseand parts for a computer for a customer of mine.

 

The Power supply, which is integral to the computer case but removeable, developed a fault within a month.

 

I bought a new power supply for my customer, from eBuyer, and returned the faulty one. The new powers supply was also faulty so I returned that and ordered another one which does now work.

 

They refunded me for the second power supply but refused to replace or refund me for the first as it was sold as part of the computer case. They stated that they could only refund or replace it if I returned the complete case and power supply. Before I returned the original power supply they never mentioned this and even stated that it had to be returned for repair as it was not eligible for refund or replacement!

 

It has now just gone round in circles - It has only cost me about fifteen pounds but it really winds me up when they just fob you off. Is is time for a LBA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The pint is this: the first time round they just asked me to return the power supply and said they would replace it - then, after sending it, they asked for the case as well - AND said that it would need repairing - not replacing as they originally said. We all know computers are modular and if they had good customer service they would just send me one of their power supplies out. To top it, when I bought a replacement power supply from them THAT went wrong as well and I had to return this for a replacement. They take ages to reply to you and then go round in circles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

More Ebuyer problems.

 

First, I bought a router from them about 8 months ago. the power supply stopped working. I sent it back to them using their returns service (I paid fopr postage). They sent me an enote saying they could find no fault. They then sent me the item back saying they do not supply spares and can only replace the router AND the power supply together. This is unacceptable as the PS is definitely faulty and I do not want to be without my router as it means no internet and no way of contacting eBuyer should things go wrong!

 

It has got to the point where I have told them I would take them to court so will issue a claim soon.

 

my latest problem with them. A laptop bag I bought has a faulty strap - they want to charge me a 35% re-stocking fee to replace this - is that legal?? it is under 12 months old (8 months to be exact)

 

can anyone help??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not unreasonable for them to request the entire item back with regards the router.

 

As to the laptop bag, that seems unreasonable - have they stated that this is a goodwill gesture at all? To me it seems that they have two options - either the damage is not manufacturer fault, in which case they are not obliged to do anything, but MAY offer this as a goodwill gesture, or it is a manufacturers fault, in which case they are obliged to replace it. Was it returned using their RMA service?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

re the Router. Do you not think it unreasonable for them to send it back and say there is nothing wrong with it? (i have borrowed one that works and makes my router work and tested both power supplies with a voltage meter) and then expect me to send it back with the router with the possibility of the same thing happening? Would you consider it right to have to send a computer back with its monitor if only the monitor was faulty? This is their stance.

 

The laptop bag was definitely a manufacturing fault. I would expect it to last more than 8 months. Their re-stocking fee is a cover all policy for any return over a certain time limit (but still under 12 months)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You purchased the router as one item. If they wish to do so, they are perfectly within their rights to have the item returned. This includes all parts of that item.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You purchased the router as one item. If they wish to do so, they are perfectly within their rights to have the item returned. This includes all parts of that item.

 

This is absolutely correct.

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe after your initial experience of sending goods back in parts you should have realised that they tend to like the whole item back.

 

As for the laptop case if it is through poor materials/faulty stitching etc then yes they should give a full refund/replacement and not charge some silly 35% restocking fee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I have to disagree regarding the case issue ebuyer should have realised that this is impractical.

 

When you build a PC all the insides go into the case if you dont have suitable anti-static storage (ie bags big enough) do you really think it is fair to have to strip down your entire PC potentially damaging a fragile component these things are NOT built to be taken in and out of cases theyre designed to be fitted and left alone.

 

Now a CD/DVD drive fair enough and even to a limited extent a hard drive but a motherboard, processor etc should not be left laying around waiting a new chassis.

 

I agree with the rest of the comments regarding the router etc but the case whilst technically they are within their rights they should have agreed to sort this out its only sensible and would have saved them money on carriage costs anyway.

 

Sadly you get what you pay for with ebuyer and customer service isnt what you're paying for. Do you have any idea how much the PSU in a cheap case is worth? virtually nothing when you think you can buy the case and psu for £12 and it highlights how crappy the PSU is likely to be, but all this is besides the point.

 

I believe ebuyer have acted inside the limits of the law but hardly with the spirit of it. I think its worth chalking up to experience and simply not shopping there any longer there are many other etailers who offer good prices

 

DVD-R, DVDR, DVD-RW & CDR disc media from SVP for media

Komplett.co.uk for everything

dabs.com - PC Hardware, Components, Software, Digital Cameras, MP3 Players worth checking

PC Nextday again very reasonable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm....ebuyers customer service may be questionable(perhaps!) but you cannot argue that their prices are due to the "poor quality" of the goods. An awful lot, if not in fact the majority, of prices on EXACTLY THE SAME branded goods are significantly cheaper than even the trade accounts we have with suppliers at my IT company! (When I say mine I mean the company I work for :p).

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ebuyer's prices are indeed cheap - I have trade accounts with many IT firms and you can not get cheaper prices unless you go to dabs who have a lot better service in my opinion. Let us not forget that cheap prices should not mean bad customer service and that all normal rights should apply. Take the laptop bag for instance. In my RMA request I stated:

 

'Dear sirs, please send me a replacement for this bag. I do not agree with your restocking order as this item's carrying strap has broken and under my statutory rights I should be eligible for a replacement or refund due to the fault being present at the time of manufacture.'

 

Ebuyer replied after 2 days with,

 

'Your RMA request has been declined - please check your RMA notes for more details'

I logged in to the account and there were not any further details at all.

This is the sort of run around they play with their customers to put them off. I am now going to contact Targus, the bag's manufacturer, and see if they will replace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I have to disagree regarding the case issue ebuyer should have realised that this is impractical.

 

When you build a PC all the insides go into the case if you dont have suitable anti-static storage (ie bags big enough) do you really think it is fair to have to strip down your entire PC potentially damaging a fragile component these things are NOT built to be taken in and out of cases theyre designed to be fitted and left alone.

 

Now a CD/DVD drive fair enough and even to a limited extent a hard drive but a motherboard, processor etc should not be left laying around waiting a new chassis.

 

Without a PSU, there is nowhere to plug in the mains lead to provide the necessary path to earth for full anti-static protection.

 

I agree with the rest of the comments regarding the router etc but the case whilst technically they are within their rights they should have agreed to sort this out its only sensible and would have saved them money on carriage costs anyway.

 

With both the router and the PC PSU/case, eBuyer will claim/return from their supplier as a complete item. If you start messing about with part shipments,then this becomes a logistical nightmare. In the case of the router PSU, how are eBuyer to test it wthout the router - it is quite possible that when plugged in and metered it provides the correct output voltage, but dies under load.

 

Do you have any idea how much the PSU in a cheap case is worth? virtually nothing when you think you can buy the case and psu for £12 and it highlights how crappy the PSU is likely to be, but all this is besides the point.

 

 

If you purchase a replacement PSU, it will likely be exactly the same as the one in a case. They all come out of the same Chinese factory. Ebuyer make their money by not having retail premises or staff; not having call centre staff and using a model of slim margins on high volume.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...