Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court and ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding them if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
    • I see the trial of the real criminal in the Biden Family has started rather than the sham political persecution of Trump    Biden will of course try to distance himself as far as possible to no avail  Even more votes for The Donald🤣    
    • Savings platform Raisin UK is offering a £50 bonus for new customers who sign up for an account.View the full article
    • With Farage back in the news, here's a reminder of his interview with Claire Byrne on Irish TV a few years ago.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shop Direct (Great Universal) Claimform - admitted debt, offered payment, but missed some, now bailiff NOE


dexyblue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm with you on this one Tifo: I also have a CCJ under similar circs. The DCA can't prove there is agreement between us and I am still going for the Bank Charges on the debt when the Bank owned it.

 

I'm now trying to find the right way to get the CCJ removed from my record.

 

A form known as the ‘N244’ may be requested from the County Court, free of charge. The N244 form is filled out to request the removal of an unfair or incorrect CCJ to the Courts. This form must be completed giving all the details relating the CCJ, with an explanation why the judgment should be set aside.

:)

Donate to keep this site open

 

Any help or advice is offered as just that, help and advice without any liability. If in doubt consult a legal expert or CAB.

 

Make Cash Flow Forecast

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tifo,

 

I understand why you are raising the argument concerning who owns the debt and the fact that don't accept the charges levied by the bank. I appreciate your angle, but my honest view is that you are going to have an almost impossible task on your hands convincing a Judge that the charges are a separate and distinct issue, the case has been decided and concluded! If the debt has been admitted and no defence and counter-claim were raised, you are effectively saying to the Court and the claimants that everything they stated in their claim was correct and you were not challenging it. As much as it pains me to agree with Zooman,;) ignorance of the law sadly is no defence.

 

If there wasn't any finality of proceedings, consider this hypothetical and bizarre scenario. In 1yrs time legislation will be passed that gives every debtor the right to reclaim all monies paid to a bank, c/c, (irrespective of a copy of the contract being produced) if said debtor has been harassed by the Company in any way for monies owed. A number of people with CCJ's would then be tempted to raise a claim stating that they had become aware of this law and they had indeed been harassed, therefore would like their money back! It is something of a far fetched argument, but my point is once liability has been admitted in full, you cannot retrospectively raise arguments because you are now familiar with a particular aspect of the law or a piece of legislation has been passed which fits your circumstances and which in your view, gives you a right of action against the creditor.

 

Consider the converse position, laws are passed which favour the creditor and despite you being of the opinion that legal action had ended, they have the right to come after you again and again on some pretext that new laws allow! That would be a frightening prospect to live with, I'm sure you would agree!

 

The moral of the story is, if a claim is filed against you, admit absolutely nothing and fight back!

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to add, irrespective of whether the debt has been sold to a DCA, once you are at the stage where a CCJ has been applied to your credit

file(s), because you have admitted the debt, the penalty charges form part of that debt that you have accepted liability for. If you hadn't agreed that the penalty charges were a lawful part of the debt owed, you would have raised a defence and counter-claim saying so!

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i understand your point also Laiste.

 

However, what i was saying is that it depends who is listed as a 'claimant' in the CCJ.

 

For example, i have a CCJ for a debt with Hillesden, which they listed as a 'Hire Purchase'.

 

I will claim back penalty charges from an MBNA credit card i had, which the Hillesden account is meant to be.

 

My CCJ is with Hillesden, not with MBNA. Therefore i do not see what defence MBNA will say. They can't say i have a CCJ with Hillesden, thats a seperate company and nothing to do with them. They don't own the debt anymore, but when they did, they charged me. What their agreement is with Hillesden is a seperate issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Laiste: I think you can still raise the charges question with the original owner of the debt because they occurred at the time when they had the debt and you had a contract with them. What they did with the debt i.e. sold it etc is their problem.

 

Here are some situations when you can apply to have a CCJ set aside:

 

Here are some common reasons for why a CCJ should be set aside:

 

# The full 28 days notice was not given to pay the outstanding debt.

# An incorrect postal address was used when the summons and judgement took place

# The summons was never received

# The issued CCJ still appeared on the credit file even though all arrears were settled within 28 days

# 21 days was not provided to reply to the court, due to a late summons.

# Your name was used by another to gain credit, resulting in a CCJ

# Out of court settlements with the plaintiff, resulting in all arrears paid

# If you did not receive any notification of the judgement/s made against you, then you can appeal.

# Unable to attend court, due to other circumstances

# Summons taken out against both yourself and another person jointly and only one party received summons.

Donate to keep this site open

 

Any help or advice is offered as just that, help and advice without any liability. If in doubt consult a legal expert or CAB.

 

Make Cash Flow Forecast

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Laiste: I think you can still raise the charges question with the original owner of the debt because they occurred at the time when they had the debt and you had a contract with them. What they did with the debt i.e. sold it etc is their problem.

 

This is also how i understand it.

 

Penalty Charges from the original creditor and default/CCJ issues with the DCA.

 

However, once you receive the penalty charges back, it makes sense to use that money to pay off the DCA with a reduced settlement, therefore getting rid of an outstanding CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Can anyone help me, I sent a SAR to GCC on 8th February and got the address from this site as 100 Barbarolli Sq, Manchester. It was sent along with £10 postal order and recorded delivery. I have just rang GCC up as I have not heard from them and they say they have not received letter and dont know of the address in Manchester and gave me a PO Box for them in Bolton, she then asked me had I included £1 PO for credit agreement, I said I had already done that when the debt was with Moorcroft (moorons) who duly sent me the PO back and said they were no longer dealing with the debt.

I then explained to her what I required she then said oh you have to write to the catalogue for that, to which I explained that they were dealing with the debt, she then stated getting stroppy and said look people send letters here everyday for Data protection things so send it here.

My questions are

1) Whats this address I found on this site for GCC

2) Where the hell do I send my SAR to

3) How the hell do I get my postal order back

 

I am on benefits and cant afford yet again more postal orders and recorded letters.

These people have the likes of me by the bol***ks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dexy, the address you sent the PO to was their registered address.

As you sent the letter by rec. del. you can check with the Post Office to see

if the letter has been signed for and if you have kept the PO counterfoil, you

can also find out when it was cashed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Replying to Dexyblue. I also sent a CCA letter to GCC Debt Recovery at PO Box 888, Bolton, BL78 1GB who immediately passed onto Moorcroft, who I immediately sent a CCA to. I have also sent a SAR to Kays. Kays have banked the cheque so just a waiting game now. Moorcroft have responded with the same letter that everyone else seems to be getting which I am ignoring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

 

Someone must know what address I send my S.A.R to GCC Debt Recovery, I am sure I have been told that you cant send it to a PO Box or have I dreamt this?

Come on guys help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send it to a PO Box. have you checked on RM website to see if it was delivered? Have you checked to see if the cheque/PO was cashed?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have started the process with the Royal Mail to find out where this letter is because it sure as Hell hasnt been signed for yet. I cant afford another £10 postal order until I get the last one returned to me, when that will be, who knows.

I dont know how some of you have the patience for all this aggro or does this just happen to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do need patience, i'm afraid. I take it you've reported the PO as missing too in order to get the refund?

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Tiglet, it hasnt been delivered or cashed, the Post Office just gave me a form to fill in, which I duly did but cant tell me what happens or how long it will take, other than it will be investigated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dexyblue

After my CCA to Moorcroft I had a letter to say that the matter had been referred back to the Creditor and they returned my £1.p.o. I did send a SAR to Kays with a cheque for £10.00 which they have cashed but no info as yet. I think you and I are on the same trail, the one that leads nowhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, it leads somewhere - either to reclaiming charges or having the debt ridden off.

 

You're in the darkspot now - the light is there at the end of the tunnel.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Shop Direct (Great Universal) Claimform - admitted debt, offered payment, but missed some, now bailiff NOE
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...