Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Directions non-compliance letters


GaryH
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6064 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This one;

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

 

YOU v LLOYDS BANK PLC

In the ***** COUNTY COURT

CLAIM No:*******

 

I, the Claimant, refer to the claim as detailed above and specifically the Preliminary hearing scheduled for **/**/**.

 

I wish offer my apologies to the honourable court for my non-attendance at this hearing, which is due to... (add reason). As such, pursuant to the order made by district judge ****** on **/**/**, I wish to make my written representations as to how this claim should proceed.

 

If the court is in agreement, the Claimant respectfully suggests that directions could be made as per the attached draft order.

 

If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objective's to be furthered in that they will fully identify the most fundemental issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this claim may proceed justly and expediously.

 

- The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendent as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendent cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and common law principles establised since the early 1900's.

 

- In the event that the Defendents charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

 

A copy of this letter and draft directions has also been sent to the Defendent.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Then attach this - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html#post482191

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I've read somewhere there is an article from someone in Lloyds TSB regarding bank charges that would be useful to include in the court bundle, has anyone got the link?

 

thanks

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/post-506547.html

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest MotleyCrue
Thanks again Gary. In light of the fact that we are sending our court bundle on Monday, this info is invaluable. I have printed a copy off to refer to should we not hear from [problem] by Thursday of this week. you're a shining star!

Jo 'n' Mick:D:D

 

 

I commend you on your awesome use of acronyms!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well thanks to GH i sent off my non compliance letter last friday to court had a response today! :D [problem] have until 31st march to comply if they dont ha ha ha defence will be struck out and i can enter judgment for the sum claimed plus interest plus costs :D :D thanks very much judge :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff Kimmy, well done and thanks for letting me know. Its very helpful to get some feedback on the reactions from the courts. Cheers:).

 

Could you possibly post the wording of the order please? Thanks.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no probs gary h.

 

to the claimant etc etc.

 

"upon the courts own motion, the Court has made this order of its own intitiative without a hearing. if you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

unless the defendant do by 31st march 2007 comply with paragraphs etc of the order of 8th jan 2007, the defence shall be struck out and the claimant may enter judgment for the sum claimed plus interest plus costs..

 

dated 19th march 2007"

 

 

just a little note i only hand delivered your letter last friday 16th march!(due to me not pulling my finger out! :o whooops! naughty me!) so court order was damn quick 19th monday!!! but only received today due to snail mail....23rd march.

 

but hey worked a treat! thanks a lot :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks Kimmy. One more thing, which court is it?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes - I got it, thank you.;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well well what a surprise [problem] havent complied with the judges latest order! ive heard nothing from them at all. tried phoning but no luck. what a total sham these lot are. and if they tell the court theyve paid me they cant have as the accounts are closed! im raring to go into court office on monday or today if have time. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats ok, don't worry about it - just enter judgement. In fact now you can also request costs, so if anything its beneficial to you that they haven't complied!

 

Fill out a request for judgement with your claim details and amounts - http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n225_0406.pdf. Attach a copy of the order too.

 

Also, compile a schedule of your costs in preparing your case and request that the judge orders that the defendent pays them on the grounds that they have behaved unreasonably. See here for details - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/65921-application-costs.html

 

File it at the court on Monday then watch SC&M squirm!

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well garyh letter did the trick(thank you) :D . my judge ordered them to comply by the 31st march! received today 2 cheques dated 30th march! :D and the other one isnt due for a hearing until may. :D

off to write my letter to court again garyh's

 

thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Gary

Just to inform you that your letter above does work, or at least it seems to have in my case, had a letter from the court after advising them of non-compliance from [problem], informing me that unless they have complied with the judges directions by the 18th April 2007, then the court would strike out there defence

 

Thanks Very Much

 

Regards

 

Alan :) :) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic. Great news Alan, thank you for letting me know.;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Gary,

 

I was hoping you would be able to help. Iv been reading through alot of the information and im still a bit confused. Sounds stupid i know!

 

Im ready to file my court claim since Lloyds have fobbed me off with a standard letter saying there charges are not default charges bla blah blah. This was after my letter before action soooo.....

 

I have just printed off a load of info from this site to read through, several times to get my head round it. Iv also printed off the N1 form. Now is this the form i now need to fill in and send off to the small claims court? If so is this just my local court or is there a specific address i need to send it to? Also am i correct i also have to send a summary of my charges with the 8% interest added which i can get off the spreadsheet template?

 

Sorry to bother you with all this just im a bit confused and just want to make sure i do this right, as i know alot of people are having difficulties with Lloyds. I have already claimed with HSBC before and won the case after my letter before action so i never had to do all this last time!

 

Thanks again

 

Amy :wink:

Amy :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, very new to this site and already feeling more confidant about where we are and what we doing. We have just sent off witness statements to [problem], having not recieved anything back on list of documents. We are having to go fast track. Our court date is in June. Thank you to all who have encouraged me to stay on task.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, am sending 1st non-compliance letter to SC&M today.. I hand delivered my bundle to them & court on Friday (the address for SC&M is actually a LTSB office building & they were most unwilling to take it since a package 'scare' at the Andover office).. Needless to say have received nothing from them. All proceeding as textbook so far :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Huh! Trying to send my letter via fax. Guess what??? They are constantly engaged :-x .

 

EDITED:

Update: Just been accepted via fax. Off now to send hard copy by recorded delivery plus copy to Courts.

amber_ellie :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent the non complience letter which they received last friday and got paid today.

 

Im was due in court in a week, so it may have worked

Lloyds settled in full

£4010.02:D

 

Halifax CC settled

£417.00 :D

 

Lloyds PPI

£3672.15 Refunded off loan :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what happened to us. Well Done - congratulations!

 

I followed Gary's instructions and faxed the letter and then sent it by recorded delivery. The money was paid into the account the next day with a letter advising they would pay by the next day. Definitely seems to be working. Incidentally we had our court bundle returned by the court yesterday saying "claim struck out after reading claimaint's letter".

amber_ellie :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent! Which court by the way?

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...