Big Claim aginst RBOS

[Sparkie1723]

[deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[yourbank]

Unfortunately NatWest were not part of RBS Group at the time the transactions took place. RDPR would today be changed to RD and only bounced twice not three times. I can't speak for RBS Bank at the time.

A lot of inconsistancies.....

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[paulwlton]

The fraud Act 2006 is a cracking bit of legislation and could be used to cause severe damage to certain organisations.

 

PW

Edited August 11, 2008 by paulwlton

[JonCris]

It is Paul. All we need now is an organisation willing to enforce it.

 

I think it's going to take a couple of private prosecutions before it's taken seriously by firms cos it we wait for the police or the CPS we'll be waiting until the cows come home

[citizenB]

Sparkie, are you receiving any replies to your emails ?.

[Sparkie1723]

sparkie

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Enron]

Read your thread, can't believe RBS have treated you like this, though from my previous experience of the company as a whole it doesnt surprise me.

[JonCris]

Important Message

 

THE BANKS DON'T GIVE A TOSS ABOUT THE ORDINARY CONSUMER

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[paulwlton]

Paid a visit to my MP Andrew Millers local office yetserday ...he's on holiday till Monday, but they checked to see if they had had a reply from Sir Fred Goodwin Chief Exec RBS ...........guess what ...NO ..so they sent a gee up letter on his behalf to Sir Freddie.....I think this ignorance being shown to my MP will wind him up even more...I think he won't like being ignored like I am ....I imagine this may do me more good than harm.

 

sparkie

 

Hi Brian

 

After reading my latest emails Fred the shread would be extremely foolish to ignore your MP.

 

I'll give you a bell.

 

Paul

 

 

 

 

PW

Edited August 15, 2008 by paulwlton

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723
sentence deleted

[JonCris]

You would present your 'sworn' evidence to a magistrates court & they would issue a summons requiring the accused (Sir Fred personally)to answer the criminal charge of fraud

[tinkerbell20]

You would present your 'sworn' evidence to a magistrates court & they would issue a summons requiring the accused (Sir Fred personally)to answer the criminal charge of fraud

 

 

:D:D

[Sparkie1723]

:D:D

 

 

Thanks Tinkerbell:cool:

[paulwlton]

They are trying to pull the wool over Mr Miller's eyes. Their claim that the documents they forwarded were the same but reformatted is intended to mislead. If they'd already supplied you with all relevant documents Why would they send you reformatted documents?

 

PW

[Sparkie1723]

deleted

Edited August 22, 2009 by Sparkie1723

[car2403]

I love the bit about how much time they've spent on your correspondance - what they mean is time spent painting different pictures on the same facts and manipulating the issues to suit them.

 

It will be worth reminding your MP about absolute privilege and ask him to bring the issue up in the House of Commons, slating RBS for their behaviour - only then can we see the fallout of their actions coming back to bite them.

 

Are you still involving as many Journalists as possible, Sparkie? Paul has a healthy rolodex of contacts, if you should need some.

[paulwlton]

I love the bit about how much time they've spent on your correspondance - what they mean is time spent painting different pictures on the same facts and manipulating the issues to suit them.

 

It will be worth reminding your MP about absolute privilege and ask him to bring the issue up in the House of Commons, slating RBS for their behaviour - only then can we see the fallout of their actions coming back to bite them.

 

Are you still involving as many Journalists as possible, Sparkie? Paul has a healthy rolodex of contacts, if you should need some.

 

Hi Chris - have you read RBSs latest creative accounting practices.

 

The media side of things is all in hand.

 

 

PW

[Sparkie1723]

Have deleted this post as mods think it is libelous and do not approve of it so I have removed it not to compromise the site.

The post was a copy of a letter I have sent RBS litigation dept and contained record of some 24 or so of provable false statements made by personel of the RBS and their solicitors and I named them

 

Apologies to all who were reading it.....all of it was true though. Libel can only be claimed when it is not true and can be proved not to true.... RBS could not have done that.

 

Apologies again to all

 

sparkie

Edited August 24, 2008 by Sparkie1723

[Sparkie1723]

I am reposting the letter but have removed all names ....hope this is acceptable as I want every one to know what the RBS are all about.

 

long post deleted

Edited May 25, 2009 by Sparkie1723
contais words not acceptable now

[paulwlton]

According to RBS the judge struck out your claim - another attempt to mislead your MP.