Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • read the above again carefully and respond as directed. its all you will have to do then the situation is almost guaranteed to be rolled back to as if you'd only just received paperwork, regardless to them not receiving your completed NIP. dx
    • Theclaw 123. As you will have realised by the above query from Honeybee, your post contained an important error that totally changed the meaning of what you were saying. It is important that when dealing with legal/government matters, that you check and recheck, what you are writing. I have noticed that errors have appeared in your previous posts, be they typo's or missed words, so I would again urge you to check what you are typing before submitting. When writing something of true import, I find it best to compose in a Word document so as to be able to correct, add or delete as necessary, before 'copy and pasting' into the relevant box/form. I can understand that you are under pressure, stress, due to current personal situations, so it is even more important to pause, take time to check and allow your brain to regather its thoughts when composing important replies; as the person on the other end of the communication is not interested in your personal situation, just what you are writing in relation to the offences disclosed.
    • 1. yes 2.no 3. your call and keep reading up here on like threads you'll soon get the idea. dx  
    • Hi all, I sent a copy of the court bundle to the 2 email addresses provided by JK and followed the instructions to change the hyphenated é to a normal e in the email address. This has worked as I have not received an undeliverable email saying that the email does not exist. As per my previous posts, a copy of the court bundle has also been sent by post to the court and to Evri.
    • Thank you. bankfodder The car was purchased unseen, yes. It was from another branch of Arnold Clark in Glasgow and I purchased it from their Nottingham branch. The first time I saw the car in person was on handover. It came with an MOT, carried out by Arnold Clark in Glasgow on 18th March this year. I'm just travelling so will add some photos later on this evening.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

deevs v HSBC - MCOL Help


deev
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was after a bit of advice regarding the MCOL. I did my MCOL on November 29th and claim was acknowledged on 5th December by DG Solicitors, where they stated that they intended to defend the whole of the claim. I sent a copy of the schedule of charges to the court relating to the claim and a copy to DG Solicitors when I received the acknowledgement. However I haven't heard a dickie bird since & am now getting a bit worried!!! I received a letter from Colin Langdale on 22nd December saying that he hadn't quite completed a full investigation into the charges and we would hear from him by 4th January - which has confused me no end as I thought everything was now in the hands of DG?

I wanted to know if anyone else has had this.

Also, when checking the MCOL it says that this claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court - is this normal? - as I thought that after the 28 days were up I could enter default judgement - or have I got it all wrong!!!!! Please help!:confused:

 

Deevs:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, no problem deevs

 

It's perfectly normal procedure for the MCOL to transfer the case to your local court after the defendant has filed a defence. Don't worry about it. Basically everything that is happening in your claim is standard for DG.

 

Ignore the letter from HSBC, they may not be aware that you have issued proceedings.

 

You just need to wait for DG to contact you and make you an offer

  • Haha 1

PLEASE READ THE FAQ's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks claire,

 

I was beginning to think that mine might be the 'test case' that we're all in fear of!!! don't suppose you know how long I have to wait to hear from DG & if there is a time scale on this now that they have entered a defence before the 28 days were up?

 

deevs

 

Deevs

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is 'standard' practice to enter a defence - it buys them more time, 28 days to be precise !!

You shouldn't expect to hear a 'dickie bird' until the 23rd hour, and then if they follow their usual pattern you will receive a letter either making a partial or full 'offer' check this carefully !!! you will then be running around writing the acceptance, and preparing your AQ - if you listen carefully to the wind you may just hear DG laughing !!!!

 

But what ever happens DON'T suspend your action against them until the money is firmly in your account !!!

 

And if you do havve to submit your AQ you will add another £100 to the total !

 

Good luck

  • Haha 2

Dec 2006 - Sucessfully recovered over £3k from HSBC with much help from CAG :-D

 

 

if you found this post helpful, please click my reputation, thank you

 

(The small print-my advice and opinions are my own, and are given freely and without predjudice or liability whatsoever)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well today I received my AQ in the post - I have until 16th Jan to return it so am trying to hold off until after payday next week before I fill it in and return it to the local court....fingers crossed they make an offer before I send it off to the court with the £100 fee! trouble is that they paid me my full amount (and it was all for exceeding my overdraft) on my single account - this is for my joint account and is solely for exceeding my overdraft - a few months ago so if it ever did go to court then it's not going to look very consistent for them to have paid me for one account and not the other!!!! Just a matter of waiting now I guess (will send the AQ off in a week or so).....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reasons why the charges have been applied is irrelevant - they are still punitive charges !!

So am I correct in thinking this is your 2nd claim against HSBC ?

 

You would be wise to have another account with another bank up and running, just in case they close down on you, it has been known in the past when submitting a 2nd attempt !!

Dec 2006 - Sucessfully recovered over £3k from HSBC with much help from CAG :-D

 

 

if you found this post helpful, please click my reputation, thank you

 

(The small print-my advice and opinions are my own, and are given freely and without predjudice or liability whatsoever)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have another account up and running just in case they do decide to close the accounts down - although about a month ago they asked if we wanted to upgrade our account to a plus account - so who knows what they'll do?

This is my second claim (although in fairness this one's in my husbands name and the first was in my name) against HSBC, the first one was for about £750 which they offered me in full about 3 days after the LBA was up - and before I filed the MCOL. They're dragging their feet with this one though - they offered me £910 on a claim of £1150 about 2 days after the MCOL had been done...

 

They're saying this about the claim:

1.the claimant account is governed by the defendants personal and or business banking terms and conditions

2.Pursuant to the defendants terms and conditions the defendant is entitled to make a charge for its services as set out in the defendants price list, including an overdraft review fee for considering whether to provide and providing an overdraft

3.the defendant denies that the charges applied to the claimants account amount to penalties at common law and/or unfair contract terms for the purposes of the UTCCRs

4.The charges applied to the claimants account are reasonable and are properly and fully disclosed in the defendants terms and conditions and published price list. The charges represent the contractually agreed price for the services provided and the UTCCRs are not applicable to them....Further the charges are not default charges and, accordingly cannot amount to a penalty.

 

Has anyone else had this defence by HSBC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, got some good news in the post today - a letter from DG with a full offer!!! I have to admit that I was starting to get a bit nervous as today was my deadline for having to send off the AQ papers to the local court.

 

I actually found it rather amusing because in the letter that DG send they spout something about it being an ex gratia payment which must be kept confidential and they also say that they are confident that if it went to court they would defend successfully, blah blah blah, and they (this is the bit that really made me laugh!) then went on to say that if I managed my financial affairs better then it wouldn't have come to this and that I should check the terms and conditions set out by HSBC...I felt like a child being told off by a teacher! Oh well, all that matters is that I have a cheque for just over £1500 coming to me in the not to distant future - Yay!!!

 

Does anyone know if I need to let the court know that I won't be proceeding with the case or do I just need to ignore the AQ papers and send the DG letter back accepting the offer??

 

Deev

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refund is in the bank!!!! I have phoned the court to let them know (they said to wait until it was in my account just to be on the safe side) & have posted it in writing to them as well....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...