Jump to content


Caught with Childs 5-10yrs railcard


Recommended Posts

You should have!

What with the BTP base there, and main COLP station on Bishopsgate, not to forget one of the highest concentrations of CCTV cameras to follow you: good chance of being nabbed.

Then, none of this letter tennis and pleading for an admin settlement: straight to court, RRA 1889 S5(3)(a).     Sorted.

you regret getting caught and regret not running off, rather than regretting fare evading.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

At the time I had no regrets fare evading as it would cost me 12 pounds a day to get to university  

Link to post
Share on other sites

By comparison with how much for the administrative settlement? (Or, if prosecuted, total fine / costs & the cost to you of the criminal record…….)

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BazzaS said:

You should have!

What with the BTP base there, and main COLP station on Bishopsgate, not to forget one of the highest concentrations of CCTV cameras to follow you: good chance of being nabbed.

Then, none of this letter tennis and pleading for an admin settlement: straight to court, RRA 1889 S5(3)(a).     Sorted.

I was going to say something similar. It would have made things so much easier for everyone if they had. Well, except for the desk sergeant over the road, of course 😁

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it the first time you used it, or first time you got caught (they’ll look back at at least 8 weeks of Oyster history looking for patterns of use / misuse)

Why no Student Oyster instead?

is that £12/ day even with a Student Oyster?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

with a student oyster card you only get a discount if you pay for weekly travel card.

i didnt see a point in purchasing a weekly travel card as I only went to uni 3 days a week

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/465959-caught-using-mother’s-60-oyster-card-50-uses-sjpn-court/

i feel like she only received a warning because of her medical condition (her cancer), 

i feel like the only reason the user received a warning was because of her medical condition (her cancer)

not yet. i am still waiting for a response from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you nor the named card child/parents not yet had any letters from TfL?

FWIW: they have 6mts to send one.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved to your own thread

please ONLY post here.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date was it?

and what was your reply and what date did you send it?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hii said:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/465959-caught-using-mother’s-60-oyster-card-50-uses-sjpn-court/

i feel like she only received a warning because of her medical condition (her cancer), 

i feel like the only reason the user received a warning was because of her medical condition (her cancer)

In that thread you have quoted, the OP hasn't yet heard back from Tfl as to if they are being prosecuted or given an administrative settlement, so it isn't correct to say "the only reason the user received a warning was because of her medical condition", as they haven't yet heard.

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

im referring to the person  who got a warning from tfl when they used a freedom pass for months. i think the username is 'tfluser' . 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

just type in the msg box..., no need to keep hitting quote....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hii said:

im referring to the person  who got a warning from tfl when they used a freedom pass for months. i think the username is 'tfluser' . 

We don't know how TfL make decisions because they don't tell the people they take to court or give warnings to. It's impossible to for us to say whether you should be treated like tfluser.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

it will show on any system that interrogates criminal records as part of their 'checks'.

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: tfl is taking me to court

I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Caught with Childs 5-10yrs railcard

they have 6mts else it dies.

.................

BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread

posts now moved here.

please keep to your OWN THREAD!!

now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.  

On 27/03/2024 at 01:11, dx100uk said:

what date was it?

and what was your reply and what date did you send it?

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...