Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shock !!EVRI has lost my parcel PS5 - court claim issued


Recommended Posts

Have a look what we have to say about good will gesture.

This is a nasty little company that goes out of its way to frustrate ordinary people who generally speaking don't have any legal help so that the company normally gets their own way.

They have no problem about wasting taxpayers money. About helping to increase the court backlog of cases so that people with legitimate claims are inconvenienced and of course taxpayers pay – and of course the parcel delivery companies simply parasite themselves on the back of it and when eventually they pay out, I am pretty certain that they set the payment against tax so that the taxpayer pays the burden as well.

This was entirely expected and I think I predicted it earlier on in the thread. They are trying to welch out on the interest element is a sort of face-saving gesture to themselves – and that is how much value they set upon their own pride.

EVRi are following the thread – so bravo EVRi. Don't forget that you are taxpayers as well so you are actually having also to shoulder the burden of money which eventually finds its way into shareholders and senior execs. At the lowest level I imagine very little finds its way into the pockets of the drones.

No problem about posting the documents here. Go ahead – in PDF format. I expect it will be just like all the others that have been posted here previously

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the figure they have offered you carefully. The absolutely certain that it doesn't include the interest element. If it does really meet the entire value of your claim including interest and costs then you have to accept. Even if they do try to say that it is without liability et cetera – the usual nonsense.

If you turn down an offer which is equal to the value of your claim – that if it goes to court you are at risk of having to pay the costs of the other side even though you lose because a judge will consider that it was unnecessary to bring the matter to trial.

So do your calculations.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a real shame the law does not protect us from these companies with regards to our time, never mind interest. Being in the military I left the house at 0500 this morning and walked back in just after 1930hrs. I am then having to deal with this, taking me away from my family, during this fight my father in law spent 6 weeks in a coma, my wife beside his bed, over 400 miles from me. This company have dragged their heels, knowing full well they are in the wrong, causing untold amount of stress. That is not to mention the stress at Christmas when we had to purchase an additional PS5. Yet, like you said, they can drag it out and offer a good will gesture.

If the law compensated us for our time, then they may think twice about fighting these claims, well, trying to defend these claims.

If it was not for you and the other admins, they would 100% get away with a lot more

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post up their witness statement lets go.

PDF attachment as from the email.

Also post up a copy of the text of their email

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Up to you really.

 

I'd redact your address and full name but case numbers make no real differnece because nobody can do anything unless they have claim number, email, address, and name

 

BUT

 

please post up the contents of EVRis email ASAP, im curious to see what they're saying

Edited by jk2054

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear .......

 

Claim No.: 

Parties: .... v EVRi Parcelnet Limited (Evri)

 

We write in relation to the above referenced matter.

 

We would like to take this opportunity to apologise for the issues that you have experienced while using our services. In this instance, Evri recognises that the services provided to you have not been in line with the usual high standards that are expected.

 

Notwithstanding the above, we write with a view to settle the matter and as a gesture of goodwill with no admission of liability, on this occasion, Evri are willing to offer you £490.75 (the full amount claimed plus the court fee) in full and final settlement of your claim. 

 

If you would like to accept this offer, please provide us with your bank account details, including the name on the account, at your earliest convenience and we will arrange for the payment to be made. Once bank details have been provided, please allow 14 days for payment to be received into your account.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Evri Legal Department

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you may as well act in a spirit of cooperation by telling them that it's not deal unless they pay the very last penny – but other than that you won't budge.

You can also tell them that if they really want to make a gesture of goodwill that they could at least pay that amount of money and then you will fight out the interesting court. Tell them that you are prepared to go all the way but as they are monitoring this forum and your thread, they know that already anyway.

Tell them also that they better remember your name because if they do this to you again you will be coming for them again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Please see attached  defendant witness statement 

Interest is currently £7.40 owed 

I do like the fact they are sticking to their defence that my wife is not the customer and then on page 19, name her as the customer 

Defendant WS - -1-1.pdf

Edited by Nicky Boy
More Personal info Redacted
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you responded to them in writing about the outstanding interest?

You need to make response in writing and explain why you are accepting the offer and telling them what they need to do in order to bring the litigation to an end – meaning, the interest payment.

Please post a draft here

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a feeling that maybe the OP went back and got paid but is now bound by confidentiality like mediation maybe?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mick,

I've redacted your last upload further. You left full names, titles, email addresses and physical addresses showing.

If you've been bound by a confidentiality agreement, you can message Bankfodder to let him know...

It will stay confidential, allow us to draw a line and possibly lock the thread.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Sorry for the delay. I have replied back to their email stating along the lines of:

I am extremely grateful for your apology and recognition that the service has not been to the expected standard.  

I am sure you will also agree that my family should not be out of pocket due to the lapses in your service, and therefore, I would like to offer you the opportunity to accept my counteroffer.

I then went on to list the Interest £7.40 and provided evidence of the postage costs of the letters, court bundles etc. The total cost of interest plus letters was £20. I then made a counteroffer to settle at £510.75 

 

I hope that is right.

 

I have not signed a a non disclosure form.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Evening all,

 

So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating

'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.'

I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.

 

What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would stand your ground and go for the interest.

Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee

However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest. 

It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases. 

I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away

Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.

 

Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%

 

Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made 

 

Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least

Edited by jk2054

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all

 

JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.  

As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.

 

Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me.

I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Evening all,

 

I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue.

I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.

 

Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for updating us. Your decision is very understandable. Don't worry.

You have done very well standing your ground against these people in a way you have and you have got everything you wanted bar just a very few quid.

Congratulations

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Did they pay out to you in the end?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...