Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thats a good point. I've attached the policy but can't see anything about reporting accidents being mandatory. Unless I'm missing something?  this is only the policy document. But I can't see it being in any of the others (list below)?  Schedule & IPBY Shows the details you gave us when you bought your policy. Includes main and additional driver details, add-ons and excesses. Insurance Certificate Proof of your vehicle insurance. It shows who's covered, your vehicle use, and any cover exclusions. Insurance Policy Explains the terms and conditions of your cover. Credit agreement Outlines the terms, payments, and interest of your credit agreement. Important Information Document Outlines fees and charges, how your data is used, and how to ask for documents in different formats. Insurance Product Information Document Details of your cover and exclusions. Direct debit information Details of your Direct Debit, such as your collection, bank details, payment amount and your Direct Debit Guarantee Pre contract credit information Outlines the key features, costs, and legal details of your credit agreement. Adequate Explanations Details of your credit agreement. About our insurance services to you Details about our vehicle insurance, service standards, and regulatory status (and the status of any intermediaries)   insurancepolicy.PDF
    • I've never thought they were reliable enough and stories like this just confirm what I thought. Tesla owner says car in ‘full self-driving mode’ failed to detect a moving train WWW.AOL.CO.UK The close-shave in Camden, Ohio, was captured from multiple angles by the car’s cameras  
    • Hi,  I had a look through the credit agreement again, despite the signature looking legit I've noticed the below and wondered if they'd work as part of my defence, a)    The document headed ‘Your Personal Details’ has an office stamp which is unreadable. b)    On the above mentioned document under section ‘What to do next’ it states turn to agreement form on page 3 however 2 pages are provided. c)    The above mentioned document is unsigned & dated on behalf of Halifax PLC. d)    Two sets of documents headed ‘Credit Card Agreement Regulated By The Consumer Credit Act 1974’ was received containing dissimilar information. Under Parties to this agreement, both papers contain different name / address of the banking institute as well as Defendants address. This document is not on letter headed paper, the layouts are different, paragraph numbers differ as does the document content. Thanks again for any help.
    • Read your Insurance policy. It will say you have to report all accidents with a certain period of time. If you fail to report to your Insurers, if the third party does make a claim and your Insurers are contacted, you will he contacted by your Insurers stating you have failed to meet the terms of the Insurance contract. The Insurers still have obligation under Road Traffic Act to deal with third party claim, but when your Insurance is due for renewal, they may refuse to offer you further cover. Best to inform your Insurers, because the third party appears to be wanting someone to pay for car repair. Or worse they will try to say they suffered an injury. Yes you will see an increase in premium at renewal, but not reporting may mean you end up in a worse position.  
    • DRS are just a DCA ardens credit services or some rubbish like that pers id just ignore them. although you should be keeping your address up to date....   BUT   you should tell us exactly what is happening as BF has said. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Universal Credit wanting to review my claim-extension rewarded during lockdown and selling my own assets


mummytiger

Recommended Posts

there are no relevant 'periods' or 'assessment points', nor any start, nor any end for any period. not sure where you are getting all that from......

you must not have +£6k savings.

thats what they simply state and thats the criteria their systems or whatever they have to monitor your bank accounts will use as a trip flag. as your bank accounts are the only way they can check on you.....

dx

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am going to do the calculations, so the £6k rule is the 'balance' in my accounts etc at any stage, not 'savings', as i am seeing them as two different things. 

Just an example for how i am going to calculate: (not my true amount as such at this stage) just so i can understand:

On the date i sold the car i had:

Car sale-£6.2k (cash)

Uc payment bank credit-£800

is that £7k that day?,

they would calculate the £1k to deduct £13.04 amount from my uc (4 × £250=£1k) for the assessment period i was £6k over?

But how is that 'savings' if the benefits part is being used throughout the month to live on?

I would say that is more of a 'balance' (part savings).

Surely, it would be the £200 over that would calculated, not the entire £1k as its part benefit payment?

After i understand that part, the rest will be fine to calculate, as the funds were diminishing over time and remained below £6k. 

The trip flag must have been the £3k cash i deposited from the car sale. I wasnt concealing it, that is why i deposited it.

I just was unaware back then of the £6k rule (i take full responsibility).

Now i am aware. I am worried about the implications of the rule and what will happen to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to forget this beginning or end to any assessment period and your differing labels of savings or balance or natural monthly wastage of the benefits given too you.

that's not for you to decide, that's their job if  their system picks up you 'did' attain +£6k at any point over all your known bank accounts and IF  they want to do anything about it.

look at it this way, p'haps the penny might drop...some people that get these benefits dont use them, so their bank balances rise and rise, they then get to the point whereby they have +£6k and get pulled up about it, they then scream, but you gave them too me, not my fault, im sorry ive not spent them!! you cant do this to me...its still +£6k savings!

in your case you sold an existing financial asset, a car, from your past, bought with your past money, it's not an additional new asset inflating your worth. it's called asset stripping, you are quite entitled to do that, and in most peoples eyes this is a big negative marker to your ongoing financial stability. you dont now own that valuable needed asset possible causing further future financial expense.

The DWP if they were to ever be interested would also see it this way. they would also see that the payment of their benefit contributed too and took your savings over their +£6k threshold.....  there is no way they would ever do anything about it, 1 down to that above. 2. because any excess above £6k would be within the £'s sums they had recently paid you. 

now and this is where some people come unstuck when employing asset stripping, is they repeat it again with another asset and bounce again in/out of £6k over several benefits cycles and that might raise an eyebrow, but if its the truth and you tell them the truth and are open, they will not be concerned, SHOULD THEY EVER ASK!! 

you are seriously getting far too worked up about a nothing burger.

as has already been carefully explained....

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that makes it very clear now.

I intend to be very truthful and transparent during this current review i am having with them...  

I guess i am concerned about how serious the implications of not declaring it, as its my own fault, that is what is stressing me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have not to date stated that you HAD actually received a letter stating they ARE seeking a review?

so they have contacted you?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Universal Credit wanting to review my claim-extension rewarded during lockdown and selling my own assets

three threads merged for history - title updated.

 i see these roads have been travelled before and the same answers given.

they are not 'out to get you'.

as stated before i agree it seems more like a 'are you getting all you should help'.

p'haps your ocd etc has other impacts upon you may not be aware of.

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been trying to work out my balances every day since i recieved the car funds (its an accumalation of cash and funds in my account due to benefit credits) i am finding it quite overwhelming,as i dont see my benefits i am spending to live on as savings but i did see my car funds as savings (that diminished over 5 months).

What do i do about cash spent on household items/day trips/toys for disabled child etc that i no longer have receipts for or didnt get a receipt to start with? How will they calculate it as a 'deduction' with no proof? Will they not allow it as a deduction?

I do not even have a copy of the receipt i gave the buyer for the car sale, all i have is a copy of the advert (asking a little over what i accepted/sold it for), they only have my word for what i recieved, what happens then?

On 04/05/2023 at 07:12, tomtom256 said:

It wouldn't/shouldn't be treated as income, as you are selling personal items and not running it as a business.

You can sell as many personal items as you like.

You were indeed correct, they werent interested in this, although they did state it was classed as 'regular income'.

Edited by mummytiger
Link to post
Share on other sites

so what happened then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reciepts i had were shredded around 6 weeks ago with all other general documents that were no longer deemed necessary,,just kept an up to date utility bills, council tax bill etc, minimal (some items had perished,damaged etc so didnt see the point in keeping the receipts as the return date had expired and was no longer valid for items i still have)..

Or i didnt get a receipt at all, as didnt feel i needed it, as it reduced my anxiety/ritual behaviour around paperwork (Ocd). I didnt ever think i would need them.

Having a paperwork clearout clears my head.....and now has complicated this matter. 

The car reciept, i forgot to keep a copy of the receipt i gave the buyer.

Edited by mummytiger
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just provide all of the information available to you that they are asking for.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

i need advice for the next stage of my uc review,

Just a recap:

Lone parent-Recieving uc lcwra and PIP enhanced (Care & Mobility).(Physical)

Disabled child-New award DLA HRC and LRM. (Physical & mental)

In the last UC review tel call, i was told to report two changes immediately in my journal whilst on the phone:

1.Caring-that i care for my child more than 35 hours per week.Despite me stating that I have family support for the physical part of my childs care that i am unable to do (daytime) and i do the night time care but no physical intervention (more my childs disturbed sleep-mental) but was told even sleeping hours count as care and that i would get CA, which now i realise i wouldnt, as i get LWCRA (cant claim both, i am fine with that).As no 1 family member helps more than 35 hours per week CA isnt an option for them either,which is fine.

2.Add child new DLA HRC award-which i did. 

Now they are asking when my health changed (seeing me as a full time carer) physically caring but i am not, my health hasnt changed. I think they are looking at removing my lcwra and applying an huge overpayment

How do i deal with this please? 

If they take my lcwra and put me as a FT carer, will i lose my PIP too?.

It seems i am being penalised for having a disabled child. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not make sense.

The only way to remove LCWRA is for a new decision following a new work capability assessment.

So a UC review team cannot remove LCWRA.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:noidea:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can send journal stating no change to own health.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UC have prompted me to do a change of circumstance and report i am a carer for my disabled child,as the CA gets deducted from my uc standard allowance, it doesnt make any financial difference, can i cancel it and state i do not want to claim CA?

I believe if the CA claim proceeds, this will flag up my own pip claim and i will lose my PIP, as its seen as 'how can you care for someone else but not yourself',

I understand that but it isnt that black and white, our needs are different and i have family to support me with what i struggle with my my child) but PIP just see you as a carer and do not care how you say you adapt/navigate it and take away your PIP.

Can i stop the CA going through? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mummytiger said:

i will lose my PIP, as its seen as 'how can you care for someone else but not yourself'

Utter rubbish!

where did you read that?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Online.

When many disabled parents (on PIP) themselves make a claim for CA, their PIP is flagged and taken away as PIP say you are a carer and thats it.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

where post a link.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to thank you all that helped with the first part of my uc review (bank statements etc), that has been satisfied and above board and now onto the next part, dealing with the two 'report a change' that came up,

1.Informing them that my child is now in receipt of DLA HRC,so that i can get severe disabled child (SDC) element added to my uc claim.

2. Stating i am a carer (assuming they want to put a CA claim through).

They seem to be withholding my SDC element back payment until i declare my position of current health/care duties towards my child.

I thought they would process that part regardless or do i have to get CA in order to get the SDC element?

Question 1

CONTACT.ORG.UK

Almost 100 parent carers took part in our recent Facebook Q&A about Carer’s...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the advice says:

However, please also be aware that where someone claims Carer’s Allowance for another adult (rather than for a disabled child) this can lead to the disabled adult losing a means-tested benefit payment called the severe disability payment.

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type no need to keep hitting quote!!

............................

you are not caring for another adult, but a child, i doubt it very very much.

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...