Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak actually nailed it in his boring speech yesterday  Starmers only offering is vote to be depressed  Just about sums up lefties  Humourless and Depresive🤣
    • Ah ok I will see if we receive it in the post tomorrow before I go to work. We want to see theirs so we know what documents they will list ? If their N265 is not received then best to send ours so that we do not miss the claimants deadline as per their draft directions.  What would happen if we did miss the deadline even by 1 day ? The claimant would use it against us in court ?  I scanned and posted in #159 the claimants continuation sheet attached to the N244 where they give a background of the case and reference e-mails etc. After this I will continue to work on the WS which is also causing me anxiety. This will also be used to object to their SJ application. I will advise tomorrow if anything else is received.  
    • Last September our 2019 plate Motorhome went to Brownhills of Newark for its annual habitation check/service. Whilst on there site for the day one of their drivers managed to drive it into a lamp post and put a 2m long scratch down the side of the body. They didn't own up to the damage, but luckily we noticed it before leaving the site, at which point the admitted fault and said they would fix it in house rather than go through the insurance. As they are an authorised Motor home repairer etc we agreed to this and a time frame of 3 weeks was given for the repair, which was booked in for late November. It could not be booked in sooner for the repair as we had a weekends away etc booked with the vehicle until mid November.  3 weeks, and a simple re-spray has now evolved to 18 weeks of them having the vehicle, due to the spray job having to be done 3 times, a window seal not been re-fitted correctly, leading to rain water pouring into the van and the replacement decals been applied wrong twice & having to be re-ordered from Elddis who originally built the camper. We finally got the vehicle back in late April, still minus 1 of the decals.   Back in March we had an email from Brownhills asking what compensation we would accept due to the delays in returning the vehicle to us (They have had it for 18 weeks instead of the initial 3 weeks which was agreed). Once we finally got the vehicle back we told them what we expected (Basically the value that the camper has depreciated by in the extra 15 weeks they have had it and which time we were unable to use it). They are now refusing to honour any compensation and are only offering us a free service for when this is due in September.   Legally where do we stand?  Obviously we are not taking it back to them for a service, given that last time they managed to crash it and its taken so long for them to make such a simple repair. We are considering legal action, but are not really sure under what grounds/legislation we could claim. Any advice would be much appreciated.
    • Usual alarmist tripe from the Guardian exposed🤣     Many of the ‘Climate Experts’ Surveyed by the Guardian in Recent Propaganda Blitz Turn Out to be Emotionally-Unstable Hysterics – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG Last week, the Guardian published a survey of 383 'climate experts' and – shock – many of them turned out to be... The Guardian last week published its survey of ‘climate experts’. The results are a predictable mush of fire-and-brimstone predictions and emotional incontinence. This stunt may have convinced those already aligned to the newspaper’s ideological agenda to redouble their characteristically shrill rhetoric, but encouraging scientists to speculate and emote about the future of the planet looks like an act of political desperation, not scientific communication.
    • Thanks all. Just by way of an update, I've emailed the supplemental WS to both the court and UKPC on Sunday evening.   Had the following autoreply from UKPC, so not sure if anyone would look at it before Thu, is it worth calling them to see if they have received it? Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for your email. Please be advised that we aim to respond within 28 days. Please note that we cannot accept appeals against parking charges via this inbox and the opportunity to appeal this parking charge has expired. Many Thanks, Litigation Team UK Parking Control Ltd  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Changed flight to 26 hour lay-over 3 days before return flight - LATAM


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 252 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I booked my tickets through an travel agency from Santiago, Chile to London, UK, via Madrid. Flights are are operated by a mixture of Iberia, BA and Latam, but the agency bought the tickets via Latam.

I am currently on my holiday in London and I've just found out 3 days prior to boarding the return flight from London to Santiago, that my connecting flight in Madrid (to Santiago) has been changed from a 2 hour layover to a 26 hour layover, which I think is ridiculous.

Surely this must be unreasonable?  Is there anything at all I can do?  Do I have any rights in this case?  They could at least provide me with a hotel or similar?  Or perhaps a different route home from London?

Thanks in anticipation of any help or guidance that anyone can give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for getting back to me.

I'm not clear about this.  I used the Flight Network website, which seems to be registered as Gotogate International AB, in Sweden.  I paid using a Visa Debit card in Chilean Pesos.  Does this help?

How else would I find out which jurisdiction is responsible for my ticket purchase?

I spoke with FlightNetwork and they said that the airline cancelled the flight and they the airline provided an alternative flight (23h49m later or 25h30m total wait time), and that this was a "valid" situation and that if I wanted a different flight, I would need to pay the difference.  Surely this can't be the case?  I'm arriving the next day at my destination as well as being 25 hours in Madrid airport.

Again, many thanks for any help you can give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, as your cancelled flight departs from Madrid you are covered by EC261, so that's good news for you.

You are entitled to duty of care for your stay in Madrid so that is hotels, meals, drinks and transport paid for by the airline. Do ask the airline what they are willing to provide as some might want to make the arrangements for you. If they decline or fail to respond, make your own arrangements and keep all your receipts. Should be reasonable (don't book the Ritz-Carlton).

If you arr happy to get a free holiday in Madrid for a day, this is your easiest option.

Your other options are to:

-ask for a full refund (for the half you didn't fly) And buy your own ticket back.

-ask the airline for a different flight back at a different date, of YOUR choosing, providing there are available seats (they cant magic seats if flights are full)

If you choose either of these, no duty of care will apply, so you pay for your own hotel etc...

One exception woudl be if you ask them to keep your new flight from MAD to latin america but change the LON-MAD leg to the following day. In this case, they ought to pay your extra night in London.

The above is nom negotiable but you may need to fight Latam for it.

In addition you may have a £520 claim for your cancellation. This is separate from duty of care so wait until you have decided your options, and make the claim afterwards

 

 

P.S. forget your travel agent. Your flight was cancelled involuntarily so now you deal directly with the airline.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They should also be able to put you in one of these if you call them (assuming those aren't all cancelled)

 

Quote

 

IB.png

Madrid (MAD) to Santiago (SCL) — Wed, Sep 6
Iberia 6833
Dep: 11:59 pm
Arr: 8:30 am
13h 31m
Airbus A350
Economy (V)
Thu, Sep 7

 

 

 

Quote

 

LA.png

Madrid (MAD) to Santiago (SCL) — Wed, Sep 6
LATAM 705
Dep: 11:50 pm
Arr: 8:20 am
13h 30m
Boeing 787
Economy (L)
Thu, Sep 7

 

 
Quote


London (LHR) to Santiago (SCL) — Wed, Sep 6
AA.png
London (LHR) to Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) — Wed, Sep 6
American 79
Dep: 12:00 pm
Arr: 4:18 pm
10h 18m
Boeing 777
Economy (S)
 
Layover in DFW
 
5h 2m
AA.png
Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) to Santiago (SCL) — Wed, Sep 6
American 945
Dep: 9:20 pm
Arr: 8:52 am
9h 32m
Boeing 787
Economy (S)

 


 

 

Try asking.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your replies.  It got sorted in the end.  I'm not entirely sure how I resolved it ultimately. Nobody will tell me.

I called Latam again who insisted they couldn't do anything and Iberia had to do it.  I then called Iberia who said Latam were responsible and they left a message in booking system apparently.  And then after 40mins with Latam, they finally relented and changed the flight.

It was all very unsatisfactory customer service, but just glad to have gotten it sorted.

Thanks again everyone for giving me confidence to be bold with them.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...