Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Evri - lost +£460 parcel - refused compensation even though I paid insurance.***Settled in full at mediation***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 193 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a parcel via Evri 27/05/23,

on 16/6/23 they admitted lost and to told me to open a claim,

I did this and claimed the cost of insured loss £469 plus postage cost £22.81,

waited 28 working day, chased them 30/7/23 as had not heard from them, jumped through hoops providing al sorts of evidence, and then they refused my claim 31/7/23 as they said my Invoice didn't have a company name to pose as legitimate.

I am not a company but and individual and could show payment made to my bank account by the buyer for the invoice amount.

I reopened my claim on the 31/7/23 with all the evidence they still required, eBay platform from where I usually sell, this time was word of mouth so sold outside of eBay and invoice customer, communication with customer, bank statement, emails etc

now all communication from Evri has gone cold.

I have sent emails to them regular for the past 4 weeks including Martijn De Lange on the 14/8/23 advising I would have to consider court action if they did not pay out or contact me.

What should I do now,

I am sure I should be paid out by them just unsure what to do next.

Do I stand a chance to go to court to claim my lost item insured amount with interest? 

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Belinda-Ann

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Evri - lost +£460 parcel - refused compensation even though i paid for their insurance.
  • Nicky Boy changed the title to Evri - lost +£460 parcel - refused compensation even though I paid insurance.

post spaced please dont post a complete block of text on a forum.

yes as you took out insurance with evri for the full amount, you stand a 100% chance of getting everything back + any court fess + costs.

type in evri and read a good 20+ threads

next stage is a letter of claim.

you should however now on only use royal mail.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no template. This is a self-help forum and you should start preparing your own letter of claim and post the draft here so we can have a look.

If you take responsibility for the things you will gain a lot more confidence and be much more in control.

Please post your letter of claim here.

One comment about my site team colleague' s post above – my site team colleague says that as you bought insurance your hundred percent chance of getting everything back.

The insurance is unlawful and unenforceable – it is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act – and in our view you would stand 100% chance of getting everything back anyway. Including your insurance premium.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay below is my draft letter. and advise would be greatly appreciated.

Quote

 

Attention: Claims Department

Evri parcel limited T/A evri

Capitol House

1 Capitol Close

Morley

LEEDS

LS27 0WH

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Parcel reference number C00HHA0369837802 – claim reference number 230612-002293

Letter of Claim

 

 On 27 May 2023 I used your services to send a parcel containing a complete EAS air suspension unit for a Range Rover P38 with full insurance for loss or damage.

The parcel did not arrive at its intended destination and I was led to understand from yourselves that the parcel had been lost on the 15 June 2023.

Although you offer an insurance policy which in fact is prohibited under section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015, I decided to purchase the policy in order to facilitate matters in case you breached the delivery contract.
In the event you did breach the delivery contract by losing my property – as admitted by you.

I therefore claimed the value of the parcel at £469 plus the delivery fee with insurance cover of £22.81.

The reason you have given for refusing to compensate me is apparently that I am unable to provide a company name.
I am a private individual. I have never represented myself as anything else and I have no idea why you should imagine that I am trading as a company.
In any event, that issue is wholly relevant to the reimbursement of the value of my property because of your breach of contract.

I have provided you with full details of the financial transaction relating to the purchase of my lost item

I should point out that although you are offering an insurance policy as a device for excluding or limiting your liability, and that this insurance policy is a secondary contract within the meaning of section 72 of the consumer rights act, your insurance policy is also unregulated.

If I do not receive this sum of £491.81 in full within 14 days (12 September 2023), I shall issue a claim in the County Court and without any further notice.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

Belinda-Ann Kennedy

 

as you will see, I have overhauled the letter quite substantially.

I'm afraid some of the matters you are referring to – such as losses or expenses incurred having to reorder an item are not recoverable and it is not worth going ahead because you and a victory to EVRi for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

I understand also that you may have sent the previous letter of claim which expired in August. Is this correct?

Also, you have told us that you are a private individual yet from your letter I understand that you are trading in car parts. Please will you explain

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh my word that is brilliant, many thanks

here is a copy of the email I send to evri claims on the 1/8/23

Good Afternoon, K Gallagher,
 
Do you have any proof of a conversation between you and the buyer that they were interested in buying the item, and an agreement on the price they would pay you?
 
The buyer was sent the invoice, he paid me via bank transfer.
 
Attached is an invoice with my bank details on it for *** to make a bank transfer.
Attached is Mr *** Bank transfer for the full invoice amount of £469 to the bank account on the invoice on the 15 May 2023.
Attached is communication via WhatsApp regarding his purchase of the valve block, pump and air dryer via bank transfer, and the ensuing loss of the package by you and the necessity for me to send out another complete unit to him.
 
Below are 3 links for each of the items included on the invoice paid by Mr ***, for the listings I usually sell my eBay platform
Here is my eBay account that I sell all my units on BKMIWAY
 
This is a forwarded copy of email communications between Mr *** and myself regarding him buying the Valve Block, pump and air dryer (PROOF OF CONVERSATION) with the invoice you already have attached to this email to him, so he could pay for the purchase.
 
With reference to your request that I show that he agreed to pay the price, please be advised that he made the bank transfer for the full amount on the invoice, which was the price and always has been my price for any of these units. In making the bank transfer, he agreed to this price as he paid it.
 
I trust you now have sufficient evidence that Mr ***, agreed to the price and paid me for the items.
 
I remain as ever in urgent anticipation of what you may next decide you wish to received to finally pay me out on the cost of my losses by Evri.
 
Yours Sincerely
***

 

yes I refurbish the air suspension parts for the Range Rover P38, valve block, pump and air dryer, they are all listed on eBay

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are not acting as an individual. You are trading in car parts – even if it is part-time.

This may impact your consumer rights at some point – best to play it down and not mention it.

However just in case you are under any illusion, if you are selling things and making a profit from it then even though that may not be your day job, you are still acting as a trader for the purposes of consumer law.
I know that eBay tries to say that certain people aren't registered as traders and therefore their customers are entitled to consumer rights – but eBay I'm afraid doesn't know what they are talking about.

If you're happy with a suggested letter of claim above, then send it off but don't be under any illusion. It won't have any effect it simply a formal precursor to issuing the claim.

This means that on day 15 you will have to issue your claim. Register with the MoneyClaim website and start drafting your claim and post your particulars of here in draft fashion before you click it off.

Please confirm that this is the action you are taking

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BankFodder,

 

Thanks I am happy with your draft and will book a singed for collection by Royal Mail for tomorrow.

I will play down as per your suggestion my eBay part time selling thanks for the advise.

I already will registered with MoneyClaim I will copy and past the details here once done on the expected day 15

Questions

1. Address they are registered at companies house as EVRi PARCELNET LIMITED, should I be addressing it as thus.  EVRi PARCELNET LIMITED T/A Evri

2. Day 15 am I correct it will be 15 September 2023

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should post the draft particulars of claim before you click them off. Not after day 15.

Yes, it probably is 15 September if you send the letter of claim straightaway

Link to post
Share on other sites

No – it is automatically corrected.

The name for the claim is H ermes blah blah blah

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, New claim should be issued tomorrow.

Have you prepared it and is it ready to go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yes detail below

 

The defender (Evri) provided a courier service. The pursuer (Belinda-Ann Kennedy) used their service to transport a parcel containing a Range Rover P38 complete EAS air suspension unit value £469. The pursuer took out full insurance cover for the loss or damage of the parcel valuing £469 at the cost of £22.81 for the service and cover.

The defender lost the parcel.

The pursuer seeks the reimbursement of £469 plus £22.81 delivery fee plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984, the pursuer also claims from the defender all expenses of bringing this claim.

The claim is for the loss of fully insured the parcel and the carrier cost. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't realised that this is a Scottish case.

Shouldn't make any difference to the result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After 17 years of having run this forum, I really should know by now!
I think it depends on the address.

I think you have to have an address for service in England. Other than that, it doesn't matter.

@Andyorch

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am probably more confused than you.

I have put a shout out to my site team colleague @Andyorch who will have the answer. He has explained it to me countless times and I'm afraid I still don't get it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can still use MCOL 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"In most cases, the court which will hear the claim will be the one within whose area the person the claim is to be made against (the respondent) lives or has a place of business."

okay great

is the write up okay for the claim

"The defender (Evri) provided a courier service. The pursuer (xxxx) used their service to transport a parcel containing a Range Rover P38 complete EAS air suspension unit value £469. The pursuer took out full insurance cover for the loss or damage of the parcel valuing £469 at the cost of £22.81 for the service and cover.

The defender lost the parcel.

The pursuer seeks the reimbursement of £469 plus £22.81 delivery fee plus interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984, the pursuer also claims from the defender all expenses of bringing this claim.

The claim is for the loss of fully insured the parcel and the carrier cost." 

Time line

27/5/23 - I booked the collection of my parcel ........ with full insurance cover of £469 for loss of damage. Parcel was collected by one of their agents and scanned on collection

15/6/23 - The parcel never received another scan following the collection, I contacted Evri to find the parcel. they admitted the couldn't find my parcel and to open a claim for loss, which I did, they advised it would take 28 working days to investigate

28/7/23 - Chased Evri as I hadn't heard back from them, they requested all sorts of proof and evidence, Invoice, bank transfer proof, communications with buyer, platform sold on. This was sold out side of the usual eBay platform hence I had an invoice for the buyer and provided screen shot of bank transfer from the buyer

31/7/23 - Evri rejected my claim as they said my invoice didn't have a company name to pose as legitimate, and closed my claim. I advised I was an individual and could proof I received the full payment from the buyer on the invoice via a bank transfer for the full amount, he even made a £1 payment initially to make sure the bank details where correct then the balance was transferred between bank accounts.

31/7/23 - Managed to call Evri help desk who reopened my claim and they subsequently contacted me via email again asking for evidence, I sent them my eBay listing as proof of where I usually sold my EAS units and their cost, bank statement, invoice and communications between the buyer and I, I have been ignored since this last email 

1/8/23 - Evri contacted me via email again asking for evidence of my usual platform and communications with my buyer, I sent them my eBay listing as proof of where I usually sold my EAS units and their cost, bank statement, invoice and communications between the buyer and I, I have been ignored since this last email 

14/8/23 - Chased for an update and resent all the evidence for my claim, ignored no response

30/8/23 - Chased via email again but ignored with no response to my claim for compensation, sent recoded letter of claim notice of legal action on the 12 September if my claim was not paid in full insured goods for £469.00 plus carrier costs of £22.81

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats your particulars of claim.

defendant or claimant - you dont use scottish terms,

the claim wont get transferred to the court of their choosing, as you are not a business.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning thanks for these messages and guidance 

If I wish to have the case heard in Scotland court near to me should I put this into the Scottish courts, I would rather have Evri travel to Scotland if they decide to actually go to court on this matter

Particulars of claim

are you happy with these or are there changes you suggest

Should I be changing defender to defendant 

Pursuer to Claimant

Hi Again, I just want to say how amazing you have all been, how can I pay for the service provided so far.

Should I attach the PDF of the MoneyClaim before I submit it ?

attached proof pre submission MoneyClaim

Would appreciate any feedback or changes before I submit today

Many thanks

 

Money Claims.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

put it up as text in msg here not as a pdf.so members can copy n paste

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...