Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC ANPR PCN for 10 mins overstay of 3hrs free period - Friern Barnet Retail car park, London.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have parked in frien barnet retail park for 3 hours and 10 minutes 3 seconds and got a penalty. 

This is from the moment we entered the parking. There should be minimum grace period of 10 minutes apart from the standard free parking time (3 hours ) in this case.  So can I make an appeal?

 

In this case for such a big retail park 3 hours is less but we were rushing to reach the car. Could have given more time to reach the car. My assumption was the moment we left the car park the shouldn't charge. But they have kept the camera at the main gate and every second matters. Not fair.

 

Please provide suggestions on this scenario.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to Parking fine in friern barnet retail park for 10 minutes 3 seconds

Firstly, you haven't received a fine.  A private company doesn't have the power to fine anyone.  You've received a simple invoice.

Secondly, you're right, there is a 5-minute consideration period at the start and a 10-minute grace period when you leave.  However, the charlatans who sent the invoice will ignore the law and hope that you'll be frightened and will just give in.

Please let us have the information in the sticky.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PCN for 10 mins overstay of 3hrs free period - friern barnet retail park

Thanks for the responses. Please find below the answers for questionnaire

 

For a windscreen ticket (Notice To Driver) please answer the following questions....

 

1 The date of infringement?  30/07/2023
 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] Yes
 

I have made an appeal following their steps at the website www.ukpcappeals.com.

 

Has there been a response? Not yet. Submitted the appeal just today.
 

 

Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] Yes
 

What date is on it? 02/08/2023

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? Yes, our car image with a timestamp

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] Yes.
 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] I have appealed just today and received the notice today as well.

5 Who is the parking company? UKPC - UkParkingControl.com
 

6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? Frien Barnet Retail car park, London.

 

Please let me know if any further details are required.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PCN for 10 mins overstay of 3hrs free period - Frien Barnet Retail car park, London.

and the pcn/ntk bothsides plesae

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need to panic. UKPC rarely get all the necessary requirements correct in relation to the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 which governs private the private parking companies. This means they cannot transfer the liability for the charge from the driver to the keeper should the charge not be paid within 28 days.

Had you not appealed and perhaps revealed who was driving we might have been able to set your fears straight after seeing your PCN. By appealing you may have made things more difficult for yourself but not fatally so. 

Please post up the PCN and what you said in your appeal.and we can advise from there.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to PCN for 10 mins overstay of 3hrs free period - Friern Barnet Retail car park, London.

I've had to hide your post - you've left the fleecers' reference number showing - three times.

It also wouldn't take much to work out your real name and your post code.

Please read the upload guide and redact things properly.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The driver is my husband so we can't pass the charge to anyone. 

I appealed before I posted on this forum. So I was not aware appealing makes it easy for them.

Sorry attaching the parking charge letter again with masked details.

I don't have pictures of my appeal since I have given the explanation and details in their website as mentioned in the back of the letter.

In the nutshell I have mentioned the below in the appeal

Since my extra parking time is 10 minutes and 3 seconds I have mentioned it exceeds the 10 minutes grace period by 3 seconds only. Also the camera position is before we enter the parking area and it will take a minimum of 30 seconds in a non traffic day to enter the parking area from the camera position and the same applies for exit as well. In general the entry and exit parking clock starts once after we park the car. Not before we enter the parking area. 

Considering all this I have asked to cancel the parking charge.

Please advise what else I can do?

 

 

2023-08-02 UKPC PCN incident 2023-07-30.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012-the Act which governs the private  parking rogues .

They have failed on two items.

1 under Schedule4  of PoFA Section 9[2][f]  they are supposed to advise the keeper to pay the charge if they are not going to out the driver.. They didn't do that.

2 Under S9[2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking period. Driving the car from the entrance to the parking spot and later from the parking spot to the exit cannot obviously be termed as being parked. That means that the keeper is not responsible for the charge only the driver is liable. 

Providing you did not say who was driving then you are in the clear. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC ANPR PCN for 10 mins overstay of 3hrs free period - Friern Barnet Retail car park, London.
1 hour ago, Panicmood said:

I don't have pictures of my appeal since I have given the explanation and details in their website as mentioned in the back of the letter.

Yes, the fleecers do this deliberately so you don't have a copy and they can trip you up legally later.

If you've never been in this position before you're bound to make mistakes, that's inevitable.  We've all been there, done that, in legal disputes.  The important thing to learn from the mistakes and get it right in the future.  However, let's cut to the chase.

1.  Honeybee said not to appeal on a Saturday evening.  Honeybee is not a goddess who has to be always obeyed, but surely Sunday could have been spent on investigating the whys & wherefores of appealing or not appealing.  After all, the fleecers' office is shut until Monday.  Instead of, er, immediately appealing.  And not even taking a screenshot of a document that you might need to produce in court.

2.  Think about things logically.  You've underlined the unfairness of the invoice.  But who are you appealing to?  An unbiased mediation service?  No, you're asking the very charlatans who ignored the law about grace periods to judge themselves.  Really, how will this work out?  It's like someone having to pay extortion payments to the Mafia who decides to appeal - to the Mafia.

3.  When the fleecers sent their invoice, they knew who the registered keeper was, but they didn't know who the driver was, so they had no-one to sue.  The "appeal" (ha! ha!) procedure where you get no copy is designed to entrap motorists to write "I parked" rather than "the driver parked" and then the driver is outed and the vampires have someone to sue.  Did you out the driver? 

Despite the mistakes and bad start to this case, the fact is that the spivs have ignored the law on consideration & grace periods, and not only the law but their own trade association's Code of Practice,so you're still in a good position. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the current rule from the BPA Code of Practice relating to Grace periods.

13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN.

"a period of at least 10 minutes ....." So they have broken the Code which means they have breached your GDPR. they are also in breach of the DVLA regs in that they must adhere to the BPA  Code of Practice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...