Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ Dismissed - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please post on YOUR OWN THREAD.

dx

 

posts now moved over.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

My case has been stayed now for 3 years now until they applied for the lift. Surely the judge is going to question them as to why they've taken so long. I'm sure COVID will be an excuse or something.

I was just wondering. It states I have to file and serve my defence seven days before the hearing date. I'm emailing the court and also sending a copy recorded del to the court for belts and braces. Should I send a copy to Erudio too?

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pellegrino said:

thought you just joined in the conversation that you thought was relevant.

Of course as you are in a similar position to the OP here and you was asking a question in response to my post. You should be submitting a statement in response and objection to their application to lift the stay after 3 years...its not a defence you have already filed that.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a defence, File and serve a witness statement in response/objection you have already filed your defence.

IS their application to lift the stay only or strike out defence/summary judgment also ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you need submit that type of statement which objects with reasons to all 3......there are plenty here that I have previously drafted for other users.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

Had my day in court yesterday and it didn't go as planned. To cut a long story short, all my arguments were pretty much shut down by the judge.

The end result was the stay wasn't lifted and a tomlin order was placed on the debt. She instructed DRYDENS that this had to be arranged with me within 28 days.  She explained that as long as I stick to whatever is agreed then all is well. Obviously, I didn't want to pay a bean back but the Judge made her mind up. She also instructed Drydens that they needed to be pragmatic in what the arrangement of payment is with me.

She was very pleasant and it was all quite a pleasant experience apart from the result. One thing she did say was that I was given bad advice on not having a discussion with the Dryden representative before coming into court. This may be something worth noting as 'smiling and walking away' didn't work on this occasion.

So what happens now is the big question. 

These are the possibilities:

Speak to Drydens and arrange a settlement figure. Pay it. End of story.

Speak to Drydens and arrange monthly payments over a period of time.

Drydens may not agree with the court and refuse Tomlin order. If so the claim is stayed so does that put me back to square one? 

I'm just not quite sure how it all pans out from now.

The judge definitely was kind of on my side in not wanting to hit me with a ccj.

Should I contact Drydens or is it a 'ball in their court' scenario?

I just want to make sure I'm doing everything I should be but also hoping Drydens don't do what they're meant to do in the 28 days.

Presumably that will put me back to where I was.

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

so actually you won because the stay was not lifted, their attempt at getting a judgement failed.

had you had the chat that would not have been the case and erudio/drydens would have won the SJ against you.

now im trying to unravel what the judge actually suggested here?  

i think :

14 minutes ago, pellegrino said:

The end result was the stay wasn't lifted and a tomlin order was placed on the debt.

drydnes have got to suggest the wording of a tomlin order which must be mutually agreeable with you (say..£PCM for xx years? <£50PCM IMHO??) within 28 days. a tomlin would see the CCJ registered if you fail it at any time? 

now if they dont do this in 28days - the claim remains stayed and they'll have to try again in court? as their n244 failed and was not granted?

@Andyorch - is this correct if their lifting of the stay failed? 
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only real threat that the judge made towards me was that if I failed to keep up with the agreement of payment then she would slam the CCJ on me.

She said the 28 days started from now (yesterday) for them to arrange the Tomlin. She did say to the Drydens rep that "they won't like a tomlin order". Presumably, they can't get their money back quickly this way.

The Dryden rep also said they would be seeking full costs (£1400 ish) and she said they needed to be pragmatic towards me when arranging the payment plan with me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts moved to your own thread

they cant inc their costs in their tomlin, they lost the set a side.

so as i suspected tomlin order within 28 days , if they dont make contact in 28 days after that you then ignore them.

they broke the judges orders let them return to court.

if they do then offer what i said, they'll ask for an I&E, fill that out, make sure you inc every last sock you family needs and things like pet ins, make it so you have very little money.

nothing gets registered on your file about this unless you break the tomlin.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

The strong advantage of being self-employed is the fact I can make it look like I'm absolutely destitute if I need to! Fingers crossed that their admin is slow and doesn't reach me within the time limit.

I think it may be worth dropping a note through the courts to the judge if time is getting on just to cover my back to show that I'm willing to make arrangements etc but have heard nothing. Only in the last few days maybe? But I'll cross that bridge if I come to it.

The judge said I'd get everything in writing from the court so I'll see what all that says first and report back.

Thanks for your help through all this. You've been an absolute star.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, pellegrino said:

The judge said I'd get everything in writing from the court so I'll see what all that says first and report back

best idea lets us check things too. scan it up when you get it

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, dx100uk said:

within 28 days. a tomlin would see the CCJ registered if you fail it at any time? 

now if they dont do this in 28days - the claim remains stayed and they'll have to try again in court? as their n244 failed and was not granted?

@Andyorch - is this correct if their lifting of the stay failed? 

Yes if the Tomlin Order is not adhered to they can then proceed to request judgment.....but they would have to make application to lift the stay and request judgment.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so ...

they have to make this additional application because they failed to win the application for a SJ?

which means the CCJ is not automictically sitting there waiting to drop if the tomlin order now fails for any reason?  assuming they do knock one up in the 28 days the judge gave of course?

if they dont do a tomlin, they have to return to court again and reapply for sj?

and of course in either case of re application they might not succeed as the defendant has another chance to argue their claim?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct DX although a Tomlin Order may state that any default would give recourse to lift the stay and request judgment its not an automatic as the claim is technically stayed so no judgment ...as yet.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ **FAILED** - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.
  • 2 weeks later...

Good evening folks,

Just received the letter for the Tomlin order from Drydens. They've enclosed a financial statement for me to complete and requested it should be returned to them no later than 13/11. One week before the court cut-off date. Presumably for them to prepare the Tomlin order.

I'm happy doing the financial statement, but do I have to fill in my partner's income as surely this hasn't got anything to do with her? As everything is split 50/50 would I just split my expenditures? Or would I get away with putting the full amount of say the monthly mortgage etc? Fortunately, as I'm self-employed. On paper, I look like I'm down to my last few scrapes of Lurpak so the income/expenditure will look like there's little, if any left over.

With regards to a payment offer, how should I play this? As the judge will see this I don't want it to look like I'm taking the Michael if you see what I mean?!

I also saw that it states that costs were 'reserved'. The judge did warn them during the hearing to be pragmatic regarding this.

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Cheers

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you put down the full expense of everything and inc her income too, though they cannot take that into account when demanding a £pcm figure.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX. 

What does the 'costs reserved' side of things mean? Is this something at the discretion of the judge?

What would you consider a reasonable offer would be if looking at a % of what's left?

I want to offer as little as possible without annoying the judge if that makes sense! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

<£20PCM will be fine. gives wriggle room up but not by much😎

costs reserved, means they cant charge them until the judge decides.

they certainly cant, i believe, add any costs to the tomlin sum that were as a result of the set aside attempt..they LOST.

 i think it might be useful for you to inc a letter specifically asking for an up to date statement for your loans and where each time say in the last 1yrs the amount has risen, they must give a full breakdown of what the sum is specifically form./for.in relation too.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX,

I was toying with around the £25-£30 offer. As I'm self-employed, my income fluctuates. Fortunately, this year's accounts look particularly rubbish which are what I'm using to work out a rough monthly income for myself and my partner. Do you think they'll request SA302 forms etc for proof of earnings? Say the last 3 years to get an average.

Yes, I may request an up to date balance as you say.

I also think I'll email the court once I've sent this off. I think it's best to cover my back. The letter I received today was dated 30/10. Then they want it back to them by the 13th. This is so they have a week to sort it out presumably. They do everything last minute! 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi mate,

The cut-off date is on Tuesday. This was the deadline for the Tomlin.

I sent the financial statement and offer to them recorded delivery which they received in ample time.

I also sent an email to the courts for the attention of the Judge just to cover my back. 

Just to explain I'd filled everything out that was requested of me and put an offer forward.

I enclosed the signed proof of receipt too.

They seem to do everything last minute so I'd imagine I'll receive a letter perhaps tomorrow or Monday.

I'm presuming if they don't sort the Tomlin order out then we're back to square one.

A judge surely can't slam a judgment on me if they fail to do what they needed to do in time.

I'll keep you updated!

I did receive my Erudio statements yesterday that was coincidental.

I felt like ringing them up and see if they'd strike me a deal!

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings!

Hope you're well. Drydens had until 4 pm today to have a signed Tomlin order back to the courts. I sent my financial statement and payment offer through, all in the timeframe required so I did everything from my side.

I have been checking the post like crazy and nothing has come through for me to sign. I have emailed the judge/courts to cover my back explaining the non-contact from them.

I contacted the courts today and they said nothing has come through from Drydens to the court regarding the Tomlin. She said there is nothing at all in the system.  This was after the 4 pm deadline

Presumably, that means it should all go in my favor as they failed to have the order in on time. I remember at the hearing the judge said to their representative that they wouldn't like it (The Tomlin).

So is it Miller time?!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Erudio/Drydens Claimform - Old SLC Loans - their N244 to lift stay/SJ Dismissed - they now 28days to propose a Tomlin.

Hi DX,

Just an update on my case. Drydens had up until 4 pm yesterday to present the judge with a signed Tomlin order.

I had completed everything that was asked of me. I filled in and sent off the financial statement and offer of payment well within the date requested. I sent everything recorded delivery and sent an email to the court containing the signed receipts etc.

I had been expecting something else to come through from Drydens to sign. A copy of the order to sign etc. Nothing arrived. No emails, no post, no phone calls.

I emailed the court/judge with an update explaining this just to cover my back.

Yesterday after the deadline had ended for the Tomlin to be submitted. I rang the courts and they confirmed that no Tomlin had been received and there was nothing on the system.

I emailed the court once again to request summary judgment in my favor on advice from the clerk of the court and again explained that Drydens had not contacted me in any way.

The next hearing is in December via phone. I'm presuming that this should all go well for me as they've failed to sort the Tomlin out.

Where do you think it will go now?

I've received nothing from Drydens apart from the financial statement they wanted me to fill in.

I'd presumably have to sign and agree to it before they submitted it to the courts.

The courts said nothing was in their system and I rang after the deadline of 4pm which the judge ordered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...