Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It fizzled out, they kept delaying the complaints process. In the end I believe they stopped charging me for a bunch of services, unsure if it was deliberate or a mistake so I stopped bringing it up. Ultimately we bought a house and moved out.
    • There are so many factors, and local elections are often far more about local issues and people, but the one previously general rule in a general election are that the hard core Tories vote Tory and hard core Labour voters vote labour   Gaza seems to have dulled both the muslim and Jewish labour votes more than the Tories - and I can see why - but do the muslim voters really think that the Tories will do ANYTHING other than talk and then do whatever the Americans say - and thats support Israel whatever they do first and foremost in real terms? Reform has unquestionably affected the Tory local vote - so should affect the GE vote a bit more, but has largely been factored in - reform isnt new in any way - its all Brexitish although there seem to be far more ex 'conservative' core reform/ukip/brexitish voters than ex 'labour' core voters - about 6-8% of the national vote in a GE seems to me. A little up on prior brexitish/faragits scores But the large swathes of center ground voters who decide who wins the election seem to have utterly deserted the Tories in their millions - although they have gone to labour, libdems and greens - and many real conservatives are in limbo despite Sunak being naturally more a thatcherite than most - his party currently seems far less so. Johnson promised much, and many were taken in, just as people (inc me) made that mistake with Farage in the early days - but we now know that they are self serving liars who can't be trusted with anything - although I still think it likely The Liar will be back - but most likely after the GE (60/40) Starmer is lacking in charisma and presence, but others in his cabinet should shine. But Corbynistas could still cause trouble - another group that seem happy to drag everything down if they think it suites   Johnson perhaps could reunite some of the Tory party - but he seems to have numerous criminal and political convistions sitting in the background should he try Lying about giving preference to dogs in the Afghan evacuations - and lying about it Unlawfully proroguing parliament embezzlement re funds and spending (eg flat referb) .. repeatedly Taking jobs before he should after being booted - should lose his PM pension and rights over that IMO the list goes on ad nauseam
    • Hi I am negotiating with my ex (commercial) landlord's solicitor for a debt I owe for rent. This has been going on for a little while and I expect they may go ahead with the court action they threaten. I wanted to ask however, In the event this action goes ahead, I think will have a response pack sent to me from the court, along with the claim. Google tells me that a section of this response pack is a 'Admit the claim and ask for time to pay'. Would this time to pay, if accepted also mean a CCJ registered against me? Thanks
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Had identical situation with chairs I bought from eBay. I was directed to Shiply by seller. Contracted Fauzer via  Shiply platform. Basically  Shiply  engages fraudsters to deliver your goods and makes a profit too. Still no chairs in sight. Who is responsible for this fraud? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The sale of my house is about to complete and 3 lots of effective charges have come to light - sole owner.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 391 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

nope you cant no-one has records after 6yrs.

 

why do you want these?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was made bankrupt in 2007

- never had any problems since that difficult time,

 

The sale of my house is about to complete and 3 lots of effective charges have come to light.

 

I genuinely had no idea that these were even there

-  1 is BH they apparently put the charge on in 2006 and appear to have been charging interest since that time.

 

2nd one is held by a company called PRA group 

- They are not the original lenders but acquired the debt through another company

- this charge wasn't applied until  2018 ????

citing failed insolvency and the 3rd one my solicitors cannot locate at all 

 

The reason I asked about locating spent judgements is due to having researched online and they clearly state that charges can only be made  on the property if there is a count court judgement in place - hence ny query 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they would not be there unless a ccj existed.

 

do you jointly own the property and these were NOT joint debts?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope unfortunately all me

- not joint 

- the PRA Group know there is something wrong with their debt and have gotten their own legal /insolvency involved

 

- Chap today said he feels that this was not part of the bankruptcy

- but surely I should have been notified if a charge was being placed in 2018 because I certainly did not have a ccj ??

at that time - As i said only in 2007 all discharged in 2012 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well a ccj outside of 6yrs would certainly need a judge to allow enforcement after that long.

if you've not moved, which obv you haven't 

i wonder where the court letters went too?

 

if the charge was attained within 6yrs then the data must still be held by whomever got the charge.

 

as for the others, if you are selling your home and are the sole owner and then these charges have to paid off to their present owners listed on your deeds before the sale will go thru.

there is no legal remit AFAIK for the charge owners to prove a CCJ existed...the charge cannot have been attained without one unless you sigh a voluntary charge avoiding a CCJ judgement. the fact some may have been sold on it immaterial.

 

rock and hard place.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to The sale of my house is about to complete and 3 lots of effective charges have come to light - sole owner.

Horrendous - i have even offered a settlement payment but no they want full payment - ludicrous and what about the 3rd one that doesn't even exist anymore ??? 

 

Going back to the PRA group they said the company that placed held the original debt have gone out of business years ago and they moved the debt to another company before they got it

- I mean the ccj that was apparently in force in 2018 must be still in force now

- why is it not on my credit file and why did they not write to me

- what a load of twaddle !!!! 

 

Thing is I'm conscious of how late it is

 

- thanks so much for being here 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

why not place the exact text of each of the 3 charging orders up here

use PDF read upload.

 

all the CCJ's will be 'in-force' still as will be the resultant CO's.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not have any charging Order documents and my credit file has been clear since 2012.

 

The CO only came to light when the buyers solicitors pulled the title deeds

- showing details of the effective charges

- The restrictions of the bankruptcy were still on the deeds as well clearly showing 2007

- The insolvency service removed the restrictions via Land Registry process.

 

My solicitor wrote to all 3 companies - and this is where I am - 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so there are no charging orders showing on your deeds?

 

if there are 

post them up here.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

(01.02.2007) Equitable charge created by an interim order of the Sunderland County Court dated 22 December 2006 in favour of Black Horse Limited.

 

NOTE: Copy filed. 8 (13.06.2007) Equitable charge created by an interim charging order of the Bradford County Court dated 24 April 2007 in favour of CI Finance Limited.

 

NOTE: Copy filed. 9 (22.10.2007) Equitable charge created by an interim order of the Bradford County Court dated 28 September 2007 in favour of Welcome Financial Services Limited.

 

NOTE 1:-Copy filed. NOTE 2: An Account Sale Agreement dated 11 December 2014 made between (1) Welcome Financial Services Limited and (2) Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS, Oslo, Zug Branch, and an Agreement dated 31 December 2014 made between (1) Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS, Oslo, Zug Branch and (2) PRA Group (UK) Limited relate to the equitable charge referred to above.

 

NOTE 3: Copy Statutory Declaration dated 15 July 2021 incorporating copies of the Agreements dated 11 December 2014 and 31 December 2014 filed.

 

Schedule of restrictive covenants 1 The following are details of the rights granted and demised by the Dee

Link to post
Share on other sites

so

 

a ICO for black horse (lloyds group)

 

an ICO for CL finance

 

an ICO now owned by PRA group

 

and an SD which covers the above.

 

did PRA make your BK? in 2021?

 

and who made you BK in 2007?

and what debts were incorporated in it.?

 

looks like everything above is still owing and those debts were not taken out by 2007 BK or were not inc in your BK?

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a ICO for black horse (Lloyds group)  I always believed that it was these that made be BK - highest debt owed  

 

an ICO for CL finance - These cannot be located and have not responded to solicitors letters 

 

an ICO now owned by PRA group Placed the charging Order in 2018 - A chap I spoke with yesterday said he thinks its outside of the BK 

 

and an SD which covers the above.

 

did PRA make your BK? in 2021?  Absolutely not  - even though there docs states  another Debt collection agency returned the file in 2018 "failed insolvency"  

 

and who made you BK in 2007? As above - I thought it was BH - 

and what debts were incorporated in it.? - All of them - I clearly remember going over them with the Insolvency Practitioner at Pandon Bank - My case was transferred to Leeds after that - They had no interest in the house or my car at the time 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...