Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aged Debts


Recommended Posts

Hello Fellow Caggers

I got into debt in 2008 and with help from the CAB created a plan to repay the many creditors so much a month.

I have had a few threads on here over the years, about some particular creditors, which helped me too.

I had one CCJ which resulted in a small monthly payment which I am still paying.

I also had a charge put on my property by another creditor, which has now been paid and the Land Registry charge lifted.

 

Currently apart from the CCJ payoff,  

I am left with paying

4 credit cards,

1 debit card and

1 loan

all of which I have been paying the historic nominal sum monthly.

The CCJ was obtained by Link, who regularly send requests to increase the monthly payments which were agreed by the court!


The debit card and 2 of the credit cards have been “sold off” to DCA’s, the loan and the remaining 2 credit cards payments are still being made to the original issuers.

I receive regular statements from these issuers, but not from the debit card issuer and the sold off credit cards.

I am moving from the address that all the creditors currently have.

I still cannot afford to repay all creditors in full.

My question is:

If I advise all creditors of a change of address, do you think they will now chase for full payment?

Should I only advise the original creditors and not the DCA’s?

Should I advise Link of the change!

Should I stop paying some or all (except the CCJ)?

Would any changes show up on my credit files?

None do at the moment.

Thoughts and advice would be welcome.

Thank for reading!

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

you MUST update everyone.

not sure why you are paying a debit card debt - i will assume you mean you have a bank account Overdraft the card was linked too.

pers id stop paying everyone bar the judgement CCA.

then await the deforestation to your new address.

and keep us updated from there on each debt.

all you've done is blindly run the statute barred date to infinity.

and been cash cowed blind as well

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input DX.

The debit card was an Amex not attached to anything.

I will follow your advice and stop, and advise all of change of address,

I have a PO Box number at the moment for surface mail, as I have yet to move into new accommodation.

I will provide the Box number to all parties, including Link with the CCJ.

Am I correct that I have to advise the court of this change too?

Thanks again

Another question please?

Do I send change of address to the original creditors, to whom I have been paying, or the DCA’s who chase? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if the debt has been assigned and the OC is no longer connected.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.

Forgive my naivety, not sure if debts have been assigned or not.

I am paying the original creditors, with the exception of Link with the CCJ.

I get statements from most of the original creditors, with the exception of the Amex charge card (sorry not debit as previously stated)and Amex credit card.

I have had recent correspondence from Amex stating that they have “Referred to External Collections Agency”.

I get offers to repay from AIC for both the Amex charge and debit cards. I am paying Amex not AIC, AIC letters reflect my payments to Amex.


I had 2 credit cards from NatWest, a Mastercard. (originally ACCESS when taken out!) and Visa.

I pay NatWest for both, but only the Mastercard is being chased by a DCA, I get monthly statements from NatWest for the visa, but not the Mastercard.

The remaining loan and credit card are both Barclays products, and they send regular statements for both, which reflect the payments.

do I send change of Address to Barclays, AIC and NatWest, and Westcot who are ”working on behalf of Cabot Financial Europe Ltd - RBS” for the NatWest Mastercard account and not Amex, even though I have been paying them?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the debt OWNER.

AIC/Wetcloths, dont buy debts

but the likes of CABOT do.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can always check your credit file and see who the named debt owner is.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably defaulted and removed years and years ago..never to return.

 

looks like only bought debt is cabot.

the rest are still with the oc's?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not referring to a default marker.....if Ted is making payments it should still report on the credit file.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

surely if a default notice was issued more than 6yrs ago the debt cannot now show ...??

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the debts are showing on my credit file, they have not shown for years.

I have always paid to original creditors, never to others, so even though Amex writes “ accounts have been passed to a specialist agency who will contact you (sic) shortly regarding the options available……… to address the outstanding balances” (This was sent in 12/2021)

I should stop paying and write to Amex not AIC, who have only written to me about the credit card not the charge card since then, although they were writing to me about both accounts before the 12/2021 letter from Amex

Interestingly both the NatWest credit cards, even when they were current and being used, never were included on any of my credit files, not even when they were defaulted!

The Cabot bought account is being paid directly to the OC NatWest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AIC dont by debts

write to their stated client.

have you ever had any statements from anyone??

esp cabot 

3 hours ago, tedney said:

Cabot Financial Europe Ltd - RBS” for the NatWest Mastercard account

i doubt anyone will have signed agreements from when you took all this aged credit out now.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again dx

Amex have not stated AIC or anyone as client they just sent a “Notice of Referral to External Collections Agency” and within the text of the notice

“This account has been passed to a specialist agency who will contact you (sic)……” No one other than AIC has contacted me about these accounts.

Two notices were sent, one for the charge card and one for the credit card. Both had balances indicated there in.

Before the notices received in 12/2021 I had correspondence from AIC about the both accounts, and after the notices I received 1 letter about the credit card from AIC, nothing about the charge card. So I am assuming that I write change of address to Amex?

No statements from Amex, Wescot/Cabot, and Link/CCJ. Only statements from NatWest Visa - monthly, and Barclays - card and loan, 1/2 yearly.

All accounts opened pre 1990 at least, Amex in 1977!

Link to post
Share on other sites

an OC does not have a client dca, other way around 

#write to amex the debt owner.

 

as for the others

if you want to send a cca request where applicable do so.

no-one will have agreements of that age.

= no debt!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, dx100uk said:

surely if a default notice was issued more than 6yrs ago the debt will not now show ...??

 

Correct if a default notice was issued...not all OC issue default notices or assign debts some mark accounts with AP

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that dx.

Does it matter that I may have requested a CCA many years ago, and perhaps received one/some back then?

Apologies, but please clarify “ an OC does not have a client DCA” I don’t understand, sorry!

Thanks Andy, but please explain “AP” ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

AP = Payment Arrangement which can stay on file and be reported way past 6 years.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, all things to take into consideration with debts....you cant always presume a default notice was issued or whether its been assigned or not or whether its still showing on your credit files or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

We have just received a report from you giving an update. 

Will you post the update on the forum and not in the report so that we can all see it and help 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Post #2 on this thread, I have taken action on each account.

I am still waiting for some responses.

I have been advised by most that they cannot provide the card agreements.

It has taken some providers a very long time to respond!

Natwest Visa have stated that the agreement is "unenforceable" but if they "do not receive the required payments as requested on the monthly statements" (yes they are still sending monthly payments, albeit to the wrong address!) "we (sic) may take such action as is legally permitted to pursue the outstanding debt"

Any comments and/or ideas please as to what action might be expected?

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

No CCA = No Pay.

NatWest is nothing more than an idle threatogram. They MAY take action (Hint: Without a CCA they will lose).


Ignore until/unless you ever get a letter of claim, then come back here.
 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

number of debts now that are unenforceable must be mounting up.

how much £PCM have you stopped paying now in total and how much total debt does that effectively wipeout till they comply (pigs might fly too!!)
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stopped paying total £67.35 pcm. on 5 debts

Still paying £21.03, on 2 debts,

1 of which is under CCJ.

Debts wiped until comply = £18,436,

this excludes debt that was subject to Charge on house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...