Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Order PC Specialist


ice198625
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 555 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

10 months ago my partner bought me a gaming laptop ive had nothing but hassle with it since i bought it below is the issues ive faced with it

 

5 Weeks in

 

  • Screen flicker
  • Poor Performance
  • Crashes

 

5 Months in 

 

  • Screen fell away from the laptop chassis when i checked it was held in with tape
  • Poor performance again
  • Crashes
  • Game Crashes constantly

 

10 Months in 

 

  • Poor Gaming performance again
  • Crashing
  • Faulty Power Button works when it wants

 

This laptop is financed Novuna Personal Finance previously Hitachi Personal Finance

 

when we signed the agreement,

 

Laptops warranty runs out in two months and dont have faith this will last another 12 months with the issues ive had with it up to now,

 

ive owned Gaming PCs over the years and never had any issues with them

know people who own gaming laptops and never had any problems with them

 

but seems the quality of this is shocking there is no easy way to maintain it without stripping the whole thing down which if you break isnt covered in your warranty. 

 

Im guessing the best thing going forward is contact Novuna ?

but guessing this wont be as easy as saying i dont want it as it aint fit for purpose

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't helped yourself by not reacting immediately.
If you had reacted within six months then you would have enjoyed the certain rights under the consumer rights act.
By reacting now – almost a year later – you also have a credibility problem because the finance company will ask why you didn't report it all much earlier. This is a very reasonable question.

You are certainly entitled to have an item which is of satisfactory quality and remains in that condition for a reasonable period of time. Certainly I don't think that 10 months or 12 months is a reasonable period of time.

How much they cost?

You're right that you may have to make a complaint to the finance company because under the consumer credit act they are liable if the seller doesn't step up to the mark. However, who is the seller?

Had you complained about this straightaway then you would have been entitled to an immediate replacement

 

Now you can have to argue with them and get the laptop inspected and reported upon. Don't expect this to get sorted out very quickly.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget any warranty not worth the paper its written on, and does not remove replace or over right any of your consumer rights>

 

as BF says your target is the retailer. but ultimately its not yours anyway, but hitachi wont care an inch. but theyve a shock coming i suspect.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave the retailer the chance twice to rectify the problems seems they are temporary fixed and again the problem arises ive emailed the finance provider and see what they suggest probably just send me back to the retailer thanks both

Edited by ice198625
Link to post
Share on other sites

when were these attempted fixes and obviously they are documented?

did you have to send it away ? or how was the fix done?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So who is the retailer?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent it away twice to be fixed they were done on a return to base by courier, all they did was re stick the screen back down, and clean the laptop inside telling me to do this step is easy said  than done as it requires the laptop stripping which if i damage voids my warranty

 

Retailer is PC Specialist

Link to post
Share on other sites

what were the dates these repairs were done on please and by whom?

where did you send it too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WWW.PCSPECIALIST.CO.UK

Manufacturer of performance custom computers and laptops. Customise your ideal gaming PC or laptop using our advanced configurator.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think whatever happens, you are going to have to arrange an inspection.

If you send it back to the retailer – and they will want it for an inspection before deciding to act out the repairs. They certainly won't want to replace it is which is what I think you want.

An inspection by them will probably take at least four weeks and may be more and then there is a chance they will come back and say that it is wear and tear or has been abused and they aren't prepared to do anything.

If you get your own inspection then you will be taking control and if the inspection confirms that the item is defective then you can go against the retailer with a high chance of success.

I don't think you told us what this item costume. Even though you been asked.

One thing you should realise is that you are unlikely now to get a new replacement.

It will be argued that you have had one year of use out of it. If the life expectancy of this kind of item is, say, four years then they will consider that you have had 25% of the value and therefore your best award would be 75%.

As you haven't responded to the question about how much you paid for it, it's difficult to start guessing and start working out what is in your best interests to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, that you haven't also dealt with this question asked by my site team colleague

 

On 21/11/2022 at 20:28, dx100uk said:

what were the dates these repairs were done on please and by whom?

where did you send it too?

 

dx

 

It would be helpful if you would answer questions when they are asked which will help us speed things up a bit

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...