Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Respondent’s representative conducting video hearing from outside the jurisdiction


id330uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There will be a video hearing in the Employment Tribunal. The Respondent wants that its representative who is located abroad conducts this hearing from outside the jurisdiction
 
I would like to know the following:
 
Is it an automatic right or does the Respondent has to make a formal application supported by evidence to the Employment Tribunal to have permission that its representative conducts this video hearing from abroad?
 
Should the tribunal grants this permission only when there is no other possibility when the Respondent is located abroad or it has a witness who is located abroad because this in the case of the respondent who can if it wishes uses a representative which is located within the jurisdiction and not one who is outside the jurisdiction?
 
For the reason that this will cause me the following detriments:
 

  1. There will be transmission of image and sounds of me outside the jurisdiction what I do not like

      2. The Respondent's representative  would not have any deterrent not to record this hearing because it could not be prosecuted because it is located outside the jurisdiction

  1. The quality of the transmission could not be good because the huge distance between the United Kingdom and the foreign country from which the Respondent’s representative intends to conduct this hearing

I would like to oppose that the Respondent’s representative conducts this hearing from outside the jurisdiction so I need know also which law deals with this issue

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your question.

 

I expect people will be along to advise over the course of the day, but it's likely to be quieter than usual as it's the weekend and some people may be watching events unfolding today after the passing of the Queen.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You as a member of the public are not expected to be researching the procedures that Courts have to follow.  It is for the Courts to ensure that they follow the legal procedures that apply to the Tribunal.

 

I would suggest that you issue a formal objection to the Courts Tribunal raising the issues that you have mentioned and to send a copy of the objection to the respondent.

 

As far as I know, UK Courts allow people from abroad to take part in proceedings, providing they sign up to complying with UK law/jurisdiction.  If they break the law, then you can take action in UK Courts.

 

If you do a Google search you will find information on this.  Below should help you narrow your search, but I think you should be cautious in trying to interpret the law and instead should object, asking for the Court to clarify the law that applies, plus what protections they will apply to ensure you are not disadvantaged.

 

 jurisdiction by Schedule 1, Rule 32 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution And Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Schedule 1, Rule 32 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution And Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 which says:

 

“Requirement to attend to give evidence

 

32.  The Tribunal may order any person in Great Britain to attend a hearing to give evidence, produce documents, or produce information.”

 

However, the important point is that the Respondent does not have any witnesses who will give evidence from abroad and itself it is located in the UK which means that it is not indispensable that this hearing is conducted from outside the jurisdiction.

 

I have not found information on the Internet about this issue of signing up to complywith UK law/jurisdiction

 

I would like to know the following about this issue:

 

1.      Does an official form need to be signed

2.      Can this signing up be made orally during this hearing or a document needs to be signed

3.      Can this signing up be made electronically

4.      How long in advance of this hearing should this signing up be made because I think that it will not be acceptable that during this hearing one party without any warning informs suddenly the tribunal and the other party that he is conducted this hearing from outside the jurisdiction in a country far away from the UK

Edited by id330uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to clarify this with Courts tribunal, as debating it online, will just be a debate. Procedures are sometimes complicated and by raising the issues with the Court, should enable them to check that they are following the correct process.   The Courts staff may not even know the answers to the questions you are raising and they will have to find out. 

 

Data is regularly processed outside of the UK on UK citizens.  Anyone working for a foreign owned company will have their HR information held abroad.  The fact that the respondent is taking part in the tribunal may be detrimental to their case, if they do not understand UK law and how we operate.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have already made several submissions to the EmploymentTribunal about this issue and a judge is dealing with my claim.

 

The day of the hearing is approaching and I should received a reply from this judge shorty.

 

However, I would like to send to the tribunal a last email before this judge takes his decision so that to increase the chance that his decision will be on my favour.

 

it is why I need to know the law which deals with this issue so that my last email will me as efficient as possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know after 11 years of being a member, we aren't lawyers here and your questions are on the real minutiae of ET procedures which very few people will have experience of.

 

Maybe someone with experience of this will turn up, but otherwise you could consider professional advice.

 

How close is the hearing?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other issue you need to be self aware of is how you are coming across to other people. If the employment tribunal case has anything to do with how you conduct yourself,  such as relationships with colleagues, if you come across as being unreasonable in your dealings with the Court, then the Judge might take this into account.

 

As Honeybee suggests, consult a Solicitors that specialises in employment law, if the Court is not going to respond to you.  They may just deal with your concerns at the beggining of the tribunal hearing, so both sides are given the information at the same time and can raise any further concerns.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Respondent’s representative conducting video hearing from outside the jurisdiction
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...