Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Thank you for the information. To answer your question, we don't recommend appealing at all. It will be a waste of your time and you could end up outing the driver. Ask any questions that you have but basically you keep an eye on this, keep the correspondence and if MET ever they send a Letter Before Claim/Action. If you get to that stage, we'll suggest being proactive. Best, HB EDIT: Could we see the other side of the PCN please? Sometimes there is information that they've left off.
    • Hi All, Can ii get advice on this PCN received at the services near stansted airport. Picked someone up at night and went to grab coffee and snack in mc Ds, and didnt realise there was zones in this car park, it was late dark and pouring with rain so obvious u see the large 60mins parking free and dont stand around reading everything. My son and his mother were in the back of car still as he was sleeping. Ticket appears to be from CCTV camera   should i appeal, then see what they say (assume it will be rejected) then go to POPLA,   Thanks in advance     1 Date of the infringement 28/4/24 2 Date of issue  30/4/24 (says 14 days from date of letter) 3 Date received 4/5/23 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? pic car and n0 plate 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Not yet Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted     (parked on starbucks side which was shut) For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. cant see it If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   No other correspondence     pcn.pdf
    • The 365-day notice account is being offered by saving and investing platform Prosper, in a deal that This is Money has secured exclusively for readers.View the full article
    • If you are confident that citizens advice are going to give you the help you need, then you should stick with them. No point in trying to ride two horses at the same time. It will only lead to confusion and conflicting advice. Also, the people at citizens advice get paid. Everybody on this forum works completely free of charge – no payment – no strings. I hope you get your money back, but for the moment I'm going to close this thread
    • While I agree with getting it done by an authorised dealer in this case, for future reference a stop/start battery for one of these cars are about £120 and anyone with a £40 BMW specific scanner off of Amazon can "register" the battery.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)


Recommended Posts

Their doners are talking

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

‘It’s been helpful’, says Crispin Odey on his bets against Sterling amid market turmoil

 

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

And here's the Washington Post.

 

"Britain has replaced Italy as Europe’s problem economy. Having left the EU, the new Conservative government led by Prime Minister Liz Truss faces almost no constraints. She was expected to be bold. She is turning out to be bonkers."

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/26/britain-europe-weak-economy/

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better late than never. Even the Beeb has caught up with where Truss and Kwarteng are getting their economic and other advice.

 

WWW.BBC.COM

55 Tufton Street has hosted organisations that have had a big political impact over the last decade.

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And now Moody's comment.

 

WWW.CREDITSTRATEGY.CO.UK

Moody’s has warned that the UK’s recent mini-budget risked “permanently weakening the UK’s debt affordability”, describing the country’s new fiscal...

 

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say @honeybee13that on this subject I can actually agree with your last six posts😀 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite so, KS. From Jon Craig on Twitter.

 

'Tory “big beasts” appear to be boycotting next week’s party conference. Rishi Sunak, David Davis, Sajid Javid & Mel Stride all confirm they’re not going.'

 

Another pundit wondered if anyone other than the cabinet would be there.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So after Johnson then truss, whos the next PM? Ken Dodds evil brother? or worse?

 

On the practical side, UKs massively increased borrowing (bonds) now warrants a significantly higher return/interest rate (costs more) than Italy or Greece, and twice that of Germany or France.

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

She wanted to wait until November before saying owt didn't she?

 

Piers Morgan

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see the markets waiting two months to find out what their strategy is.

 

Apparently Mad Mary and Kamikaze thought traders, rich people and the markets would love their budget. I wonder if they asked anyone before they went ahead with Britannia Unchained economics.

 

Still nobody has seen Truss and Kwarteng was only spotted because he used the front door coming out of the Treasury. He soon vanished back into the building.

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This ones already been passed as OK by OFcom, So we can all hope a

“vent opens up in the ground and clawed hands drag [Johnson] screaming into hell”

 

Seems reasonable that Ofcom would declare adding Truss and Kwasi in those brackets is fine too given the Johnson adjudication?

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, honeybee13 said:

And here's the Washington Post.

 

"Britain has replaced Italy as Europe’s problem economy. Having left the EU, the new Conservative government led by Prime Minister Liz Truss faces almost no constraints. She was expected to be bold. She is turning out to be bonkers."

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/26/britain-europe-weak-economy/

 

 

I dont think anyone could have reasonably thought Truss was a good choice for Britain, even those who thought johnson would be despite his record.

So something else is at play.

Trashing a nation to make some money is bragging rights, not shameful in some eyes.

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets just put this in a simplified perspective.

 

Mad Mary and KamiKwazi have just FURTHER trashed the UK economy to put an extra £200B on the taxpayers credit card to give most of it to

* Guarantee obscene profits of Energy companies and their mostly foreign shareholders and investors (Over 100 billion pounds)

* Give £1B (one billion GB pounds) in tax breaks to the richest 2,500 people alone

* Give a big wodge (tens of thousands of pounds each) of tax break money to each of the rest of the richest 1% in Britain.

 

 

The excuse was to boost the economy. What it has actually done has pretty much doubled the cost of the debt we have and are increasing, and utterly trashed the tattered remnants of our nations fiscal credibility along with ANOTHER huge boot in the nuts of our nations economy

 

- Rather than have a windfall tax on foreign profiting energy companies - who happen to be (allegedly) Tory doners.

While other tory donors and members/MPs allegedly have made millions shorting the pound expecting this crash after (allegedly) being briefed.

 

 

 

 

  • I agree 2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

What to expect now

 

Doubling down on trying to force more austerity, service reduction and benefits cuts made essential by giving the rich and  energy companies wodges of UK taxpayer money they have just announced

 

then they may 'withdraw the couple billion quid to the rich (probably along with the top 1% couple of billion as a scapegoat while leaving the 100 billion plus for the energy companies

- while effectively threatening to withdraw it all - including the support for the poorer

 

Then Truss will sack kwasi

 

Then a no-confidence vote and/or a general election - although the ERG will NOT want that until they have squeezed every penny they can, re-established fracking and created law-immune tax haven ports

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone listen to any of the interviews? One journo said you might as well have recorded the first answer to Radio Leeds in the first interview and replayed that. I did manage to hear the Radio Kent one and the the lady tried hard to get answers, even cutting across the PM to try and stop her waffling. Truss was robotic IMO.

 

I doubt if it's made any difference at all, especially with the markets.

  • I agree 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone on Twitter had a good suggestion, although co-ordinating the questions and sequence might not be easy.

 

They could have run it like one long interview, with presenters asking a series of questions so that Truss couldn't keep repeating the bits about help with fuel bills, etc.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having heard clips of the interviews with local radio presenters, I think asking the same question more than once worked and the guys did a great job. You can hear the cogs whirring after some of their questions while the PM tries to find something to say which isn't normally an answer to the question asked.

 

There's a compilation of all the interviews.

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

The full set of interviews with the Prime Minister on BBC Local Radio

 

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...