Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor PE/DCBL ANPR PCN CCJ - UPPER MILL, UPPER MILL CANAL SIDE, SLAITHWAITE, HD7 5HA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So have you written to Parking Eye to say you will pay if they consent to set aside?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I hand wrote a letter 9 days ago, I don't expect these con artists to reply tho.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.  Well done.

Therefore you now have to decide between two unpalatable choices.

1.  Do nothing.  PE will not try to enforce judgement over a single ticket.  You get away with not paying.  However, your credit file is knackered for six years.

2.  Fork out £275 and apply to the court for set aside.  dx has explained what you would need to convince the court of:

On 07/07/2022 at 12:20, dx100uk said:

Just to clarify a set aside.

You need to meet 2 criteria.

1. A valid reason why you did not receive the original claimform, i'e the claimant failed to undertake due diligence in the letter of claim stage to ascertain your correct address. Etc etc.. Typically this is always given.

2. A valid defence upon why you do not owe the sum claimed..this is the part that is at present a doubt.

If either are not met your £275 set aside fee is wasted and you'll still have a ccj for 6yrs.

So when deciding ask yourself if realistically you can satisfy the court on both points.

You could start by telling us the circumstances you got the ticket in.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there anything dodgy about the ticket where it was signage etc, but you need that POC

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, I called Northants, they said to get copy of the judgement ccj and the address and particulars of claim from the claimform would cost me £22. The lady at Northants has said she can copy the info and type it out in an email,

She is doing this now. 

Once I have this info what am I doing with it?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Telling us 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk 

OK well

 

Judgement date: 16/11/21

judgement amount: £157

 

Address: In Chester (i moved from here in early June 2021, I moved to Yorkshire. 

 

INFO: Claim for monies outstanding from the defendant in relation to a parking charge reference ******. Issued on 03rd July 2021. Lnd managed by PARKING EYE ****. 

Vehicle entered and leaving site on 30th June 2021 and parking without valid ticket. 

Pursuant to SCH 4 of the protection of freedoms act 2012, notice has been given to the reg keeper making them liable for the parking charge payable. upon breach. 

END. 

 

If I had got this I would have actioned it, wrote them back, contested it or paid it. Now I have a CCJ on my file for £150! I don't even understand how you can ruin someone's credit for £150... what a land we live in eh!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need the full POC verbatim minus your reg number.

 

what date did you move 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what land and where

the POC will must state where and at what time/date you were issued the speculative invoice .

 

you can't have moved before the issuance of the invoice?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please see blow case details as requested.

 

Judgment date: 16/11/21

Judgment amount: £157.00

 

The address that has been provided to us from the claimant for the defendant is:

ADDRESS

CHESTER

 

Particulars of claim:

 

1. CLAIM FOR MONIES OUTSTANDING FROM THE        DEFENDANT IN RELATION TO A PARKING CHARGE    (REFERENCE (removed by OP)) ISSUED ON          03/07/2021.

 

2. THE SIGNAGE CLEARLY DISPLAYED  THROUGHOUT UPPER MILL, UPPER MILL CANAL SIDE, SLAITHWAITE, HD7 5HA STATES THAT THIS IS  PRIVATE LAND, MANAGED BY PARKINGEYE LTD, AND THAT IT IS SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS,  INCLUDING THE PAYMENT OF PARKING TARIFFS, BY WHICH THOSE WHO PARK AGREE TO BE BOUND (THE  CONTRACT).

 

3. PARKINGEYE'S ANPR SYSTEM CAPTURED VEHICLE (removed by op) ENTERING AND LEAVING THE SITE ON 30/06/2021, AND PARKING WITHOUT A VALID   PAID PARKING TICKET.

 

4. PURSUANT TO SCH 4 OF THE PROTECTION OF FREEDOMS ACT 2012, NOTICE HAS  BEEN GIVEN TO THE REGISTERED KEEPER, MAKING  THEM LIABLE FOR THE PARKING CHARGE PAYABLE   UPON BREACH.    

Link to post
Share on other sites

At last, after 66 posts .....only asked for this in post 2.  

 

You will have a very hard time and waste £275 if you tried to set aside.

 

I think ftmdaves last post sums things up nicely 

 

Sorry 

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need a concrete defence as to why their  Invoice was flawed or incorrect

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrk123 said:

Why wouldn't I?

I had absolutely no idea I had been sent anything from PE.

Because you purposefully did not tell them you had moved, and still believed this was the right thing, not letting them know your new address even when trying to negotiate payment.

 

as i said numerous times even in the 1st dozen posts........

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happened on 30 June last year?

 

The fleecers say you parked without a ticket in a car park at HD7 5HA.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a letter from dcbl (removed - dx)

 

"NOTICE OF INTENDED ENFORCEMENT ACTION"

 

I do understand that they have zero powers, it's under the £600 limit and also I am not in any kind of contract with them, should I just rip this letter up and shoo them away. 

No way am I paying the £157 now they have given me  a CCJ.. They played their cards and screwed me over.

 

It even says at the bottom (in small print of course) "this case is not subject to high court or bailiff action, however should you fail to contact us our client may instruct enforcement action against you"

 

Can I tell them to (removed - dx)  or what?

Edited by dx100uk
vailed swearing removed - behave...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ignore them.  It's a scare tactic.

 

"This case is not subject to high court or bailiff action, however should you fail to contact us our client may instruct enforcement action against you".

 

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i send them a letter instructing them that if I receive one more harassment letter I will take them to court? Because each letter I receive it causes a lot of stress, of course.  

 

"For every letter you send to me from this date on, you will be liable to pay me the sum of £1000 for each letter"

Edited by mrk123
Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis shouldn't they write to you?  You broke the T&Cs in the car park (presumably, you won't actually tell us what happened that day).  You didn't defend their claim when you had the chance to do so due to not updating your logbook with the DVLA which is a legal requirement.  They have a CCJ issued by a court.  You have defied the court and won't pay when ordered to do so.

 

Despite all that fortunately there is little they can really do so ignore them.  .

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor PE/DCBL ANPR PCN CCJ - UPPER MILL, UPPER MILL CANAL SIDE, SLAITHWAITE, HD7 5HA

nope.

why do you think that?

 

not par chance been reading Freeman Of The Land websites have we?

cause that's where most of this rubbish comes from.....

 

that would also explain why you thought it important not to disclose your new address whilst trying to resolve this issue...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL are you are a conspiracy theorist?

I am a conspiracy fascist myself, but now you are really  are coming up with the twaddle. 

You assume I did not want to disclose my address on purpose... where do you get this twaddle from?

You are making a statement here, where have you got this info? Are you making it up in your head. 

Yes you have been helpful here and there through this thread, and I appreciate your help, but I also must point out when I see someone getting a little lost in their head making stories up.. stop doing this. You are welcome. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

A few of you may know I got a back door ccj for a parking ticket, moved house and I was not notified of ccj but suppose I did not notify these people also. Was all a bit confusing.

 

Someone on here said I may still be able to remove this? And not by paying a court £280 to hope it is removed.

 

Am I right in thinking this is possible by any other means?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...