Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well you could say that you have pictures where the signs were not on the wall where you parked so would require strict proof of when they were erected . But in any case it was dark so even if a sign was there you didn't see as it was not illuminated. Little point in not having signs that can be seen at night though it obviously makes it easier to issue PCNs and pursue motorists claiming they have breached non contractual contracts whilst breaching those same motorist's GDPR.
    • It fizzled out, they kept delaying the complaints process. In the end I believe they stopped charging me for a bunch of services, unsure if it was deliberate or a mistake so I stopped bringing it up. Ultimately we bought a house and moved out.
    • There are so many factors, and local elections are often far more about local issues and people, but the one previously general rule in a general election are that the hard core Tories vote Tory and hard core Labour voters vote labour   Gaza seems to have dulled both the muslim and Jewish labour votes more than the Tories - and I can see why - but do the muslim voters really think that the Tories will do ANYTHING other than talk and then do whatever the Americans say - and thats support Israel whatever they do first and foremost in real terms? Reform has unquestionably affected the Tory local vote - so should affect the GE vote a bit more, but has largely been factored in - reform isnt new in any way - its all Brexitish although there seem to be far more ex 'conservative' core reform/ukip/brexitish voters than ex 'labour' core voters - about 6-8% of the national vote in a GE seems to me. A little up on prior brexitish/faragits scores But the large swathes of center ground voters who decide who wins the election seem to have utterly deserted the Tories in their millions - although they have gone to labour, libdems and greens - and many real conservatives are in limbo despite Sunak being naturally more a thatcherite than most - his party currently seems far less so. Johnson promised much, and many were taken in, just as people (inc me) made that mistake with Farage in the early days - but we now know that they are self serving liars who can't be trusted with anything - although I still think it likely The Liar will be back - but most likely after the GE (60/40) Starmer is lacking in charisma and presence, but others in his cabinet should shine. But Corbynistas could still cause trouble - another group that seem happy to drag everything down if they think it suites   Johnson perhaps could reunite some of the Tory party - but he seems to have numerous criminal and political convistions sitting in the background should he try Lying about giving preference to dogs in the Afghan evacuations - and lying about it Unlawfully proroguing parliament embezzlement re funds and spending (eg flat referb) .. repeatedly Taking jobs before he should after being booted - should lose his PM pension and rights over that IMO the list goes on ad nauseam
    • Hi I am negotiating with my ex (commercial) landlord's solicitor for a debt I owe for rent. This has been going on for a little while and I expect they may go ahead with the court action they threaten. I wanted to ask however, In the event this action goes ahead, I think will have a response pack sent to me from the court, along with the claim. Google tells me that a section of this response pack is a 'Admit the claim and ask for time to pay'. Would this time to pay, if accepted also mean a CCJ registered against me? Thanks
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Self managed DMP - management issues already - scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you HB

Just an update and wondering when to ignore or update creditors and is it time to set up pro rata. 

No payments have been made to any debt for around a year now and all have defaulted except Starling.

Do we need to keep OC and sold on owners informed that we have a deficit and payment plans with council tax and ground rent until April 2024 and little chance of health improving.  

Worried they may assume we have money and are refusing to pay rather than cannot pay and then they do a letter of claim, is it important to have kept creditors/debt owners updated, especially as we have no pro rata set up for any and especially if ever it got to court.

If an OC knows we have hardship troubles and then sells the debt on, do I re- inform the new owner of hardship or ignore them. Not sure with data protection if they pass the info on or not and therefore it helps them to be updated. So far I’ve just ignored most, though I think some know but not all know. 

The reason I ask is Oakbrook (likely loans) sold it to ACI. ACI have written saying they have a note that we are in financial difficulty. Should `I confirm this with them or do a CCA, haven’t paid for 18 months so can a CCA wait. I want to try and avoid court claims where possible and not sure but I’ve read there’s a time to ignore and be radio silent and a time to keep them updated so they know what’s going on. 

Writing an update to them acknowledges it and resets the statue barred clock though,  is that correct, as does making a payment. 

I’ve read up and see that after default I should set up payment plans. Nothing has been paid in about a year. In post no23 you said to wait and see where they go, no rush, I’m just checking if it’s time yet to set up a pro rata plan.

This keeps happening how is it handled please: we wrote and changed all addresses from when we moved but some creditors agents and debt owners are using the wrong address, should I let them know in case they issue a letter of claim, or is it their fault if they use the wrong address once informed in writing of the correct address, they’re getting the flat number and house number wrong and post code. The original creditors did or have used the correct address so it’s the new owners or debt agents that are getting it wrong.

My Scottish debts living in Scotland:

Monzo Overdraft, flex and loan; Capital one credit card …haven’t heard anything since default. I don’t think Monzo sent a default notice for at least one, unless it’s on the app but they’ve closed it down so I can’t see any info anymore.  Should I offer a pro rata yet and is it right we wouldn’t  get a letter of claim but a sheriff delivering papers, would we get any pre warning.

Fluid credit card have got resolvecall involved, RC are using the wrong address. Should I tell them or leave it. Fluid have it correct.

Wife’s English debts living in Scotland:

Clydesdale Virgin know we have a problem with deficit and health, they asked for a letter from GP and IE form be filled in. She doesn’t want to do a GP letter but could easily get one.  Should we keep them updated, will it help for when they sell it. She won’t be able to pay anytime soon.

Nationwide and Tesco are now with Opus and Moorcroft but not sold yet. Should we do a pro rata plan yet or keep them updated.

Starling overdraft have still not defaulted and adding interest each month. They know the situation but seem to have forgotten and it’s like it’s all gone back to the beginning of collection again, which makes me wonder if they keep any info they were told or not.

The two Aqua, you have already said are unenforceable, Cabot are writing asking about the situation, Cabot gave it to Orbit to manage who got the wrong address and now today Cabot have written with the correct address saying they are taking it back over again and want me to do a payment plan.

Should I ignore or update them on the situation, to hopefully stop them doing a court claim. I know you said to ignore Link until letter of claim but wondered if same applied to Cabot and wondered why are they taking it over again.

I think I’m struggling to work out when to keep them updated and when to ignore, because getting lots of phone calls (we don’t answer) but happy to write if it helps them to know for sure it’s a waste of time trying to take us to court, also happy to ignore but if it comes to court in time,

want to have done everything correct from keeping them updated on the situation if necessary and to setting up pro rata, rather than them say to a judge we’ve ignored it, just I’m getting lost off with who knows what but it’s written down and screenshot somewhere apart form the apps, I lost all that info I had so what I’m saying is if they’ve been told once is that enough even when sold on and do I need proof or does it even matter.

Several had refused £1 a month because of the deficit. I’ve read you should pay  OC and enforceable £1 as way as good faith. I haven’t done this in the last year and not sure if it’s time I should.

Most were ok at taking no payment for a year but now the year is up do I contact them and when they contact me do I reply and update them.

Thank you

Stuckfast

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good , they have all defaulted, don't do or pay anything , aside from informing them of your current address, and I think you did that already.

All that matters are priorities like rent and council tax

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea dont crawl!!

bottom line is ignore everyone unless you ever get a letter of claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACI, Moorcroft , opus all dont buy debts

unless you've received a notice of assignment from the DCA the debt has NOT been sold to them IGNORE!!, as i said their letters will state 'our client' xxxx.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure more experinced people will be able to advise and help.  From experience, why not contact National Debt Line, very good for;

a] sorting and printing you budget sheets, so if need arise you can send one to debt people, showing exactly what may or may  be left over for debts, making sure your priorities are sorted and other living costs.

b]  Also good for templates to use for letters etc, or ask on here

c]  Also register an dthey can offer advice on the phone or on line.

However, again, personal experience, try not to use current credit cards, especially if you cant afford the repayments, I am not sure how the debtors view pro rat repayments when you payig other current debts.

It does sound a upseting situation, but do not pay them anything more that you can safely afford, even a £1.

Hope you get it all sorted. I personally, again experience, do not phone, accept calls, e mails, I prefer and advise, letters only and keep proof of all documents. Keep a diary to not all actions, contacts, messages, months down the line you may need them to refer to.

 

all the very best

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks London, we’ll focus on priorities and not contact them. Yeah, all addresses were changed in writing but some have since passed on the new address incorrectly so our neighbours keep getting the letter or postman sometimes catches it and we get it. 

 

Thanks DX, we’ll do that. Sorry, I’ve made an error with what I said regarding Oakbrook (Likely Loans) and ACI, I’ve just looked again.

 

I have received a notice of assignment on ACI letter head (email) stating that Oakbrook trading as Likely Loans have sold the debt to Perch Capital and have appointed us ACI to manage it. In this notice of assignment ACI stated that Likely Loans had shared information about my personal and financial situation and would like to help going forward. I was just wondering if I should confirm I don’t have any money, CCA it or wait with doing CCA with it being new from late 2021 or ignore. The debt was for £1500 but they preloaded the interest so it’s over £2100. It was taken out in Scotland.

 

Thank you again

Stuckfast

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yorky55 said:

From experience, why not contact National Debt Line,

nope because all these free DMP/Advice sites simply encourage blindly paying without ensuring the correct paperwork exists if the debt has been sold on or that if the debt is still with the OC they issue a default notice ASAP so the 6yrs ticks from its earliest point possible.

do it yourself so easy!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

important thing @Stuckfast not to get to worried or stressed [easier said than done] you have a lot of debt built up, dont go adding more on new cards if you cant pay for it.  Re work your budget sheet, leave only a amount to pay back and stick to it. Do what is best for you.  good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk Just to confirm, I’m literally going to ignore everything from now unless I receive a  letter of claim or Scottish equivalent. 

Post #31: I also ignore Perch Capital and not CCA them?  Same applies with any new owners of any debt and CCA at the point of any letter of claim now. And addresses just forget about. 

Thank you

Stuckfast

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Self managed DMP - management issues already - scotland

I know I’m wittering on about addresses,

but on my credit file Newday (Fluid) have the correct address from when the debt was taken out. Cabot who own it now have reported on the credit file that I have moved and not given them a new address. I’ve not moved.

I know you’ve said to ignore everything and I will but if they try for a back door decree will I be able to get it removed.

Also, on my wife’s credit file,

all new addresses are correct apart from M&S bank.

As you know a few months ago I mentioned they refused to change it without ringing, well it’s been sorted I have proof I’ve given the correct address, and today Wescott have written using the wrong address, and M&S still have it wrong.

Is it my wife’s responsibility to keep telling M&S (she’ll ignore Wescott) or is it their problem if they can’t use the correct address and therefore if she got a back door CCJ it could be challenged.

 

Sorry to be a pain 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are going by the address shown again a particular debt on a credit file, that's not normally the address where the debt is now registered, it's typically the address where the credit was first taken out or defaulted at.

as long as the debt owner, has in writing been informed of the correct and current address, if it's changed from the original take out address, there is no danger of backdoor litigation.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...