Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think final version of WS now prepared with exhibits added.  All numbered properly. Of course it can still be tweaked if necessary. Laura will not need it on 25 June as that is just a Preliminary Hearing for her to represent her son. But as DCBL messed up and thought it was WS time why not prepare things calmly in advance. Defendant's WS - versione 3 + attachments.pdf
    • Your case shows the idiocy of employing a solicitor to do things you could easily do yourself. Had Countryside dealt with their own case they would have entered judgement on 4 June and there would have been no way back for you. But they thought they were clever by running to Rachael and Sean of BW Legal for a more "professional" (aye, right) service.  These dodgy solicitors can only make money on private parking cases by doing everything on the ultra cheap and certainly cant check the judgement date for every single separate case. Ho!  Ho!  Ho! Anyway, glad you got the defence filed OK. The next stage is that the central bulk court will send out a simple form called a Directions Questionnaire to you and to Countrywide which is part of the allocations process to your local court.  If you read this short thread you will see all the stages of the court process  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/406892-highview-parking-anpr-pcn-claimform-urban-exchange-manchester-claim-dismissed/#comments
    • It is already trespass, nothing further needed to make out trespass. Not sure where ‘interference with goods’ helps you / how you’d bring a claim for that that stops them parking there.
    • Thanks Dx,    For some further information, the holiday was booked as a package holiday for 2. One of the 2 had to be changed, and changing costs £700 for a new flight as "tickets had been issued and they cant do a name change". I cant quite figure out how compensation works for things when it comes to package holidays.    From what I can tell  - The plane was due to land in Turks and Caicos to drop off passengers, something happened during descent, resulting in technical fault.  - The rest of the original flight from Turks & Caicos -> Montego Bay was cancelled  - A New flight was put on today, which was then delayed by 1.5hrs aswell  - Hotel was provided for the night after much hassle.  - 1.5 days, 2 evenings of holiday lost  If I understand correctly, since the original flight (LHR -> Turks -> Montego Bay) was cancelled, they are both entitled to a refund on that full flight? I can't quite work out if they are only entitled to a refund for the equivalent of Turks -> Montego Bay, or for the full LHR->Turks->Montego Bay, since it was issued as one ticket/all Virgin, and they should have arrived yesterday..?)  I can't work out how to get the cost of that compensation, or whether its a set figure, and how the loss of days of holiday is factored in   I am aware:  If you received less than 14 days’ notice of the cancellation, you are generally due compensation, awarded in pounds or euros depending on where your flight was due to depart from, according to the following scale: £220 / €250 for all flights of 1,500km or less (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam); £350 / €400 for all flights between 1,500km and 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakech); £520 / €600 for all other flights (e.g. London to New York). Compensation will be reduced by 50% if the arrival time of the replacement flight doesn’t exceed the arrival time of the original flight by: two hours for flights of 1,500km or less; three hours for flights between 1,500km and 3,500km; four hours for all other flights. So I "think" its £520pp for the flight part as compensation (7500km)... but some sites say its a full refund for the flight... is it both?  Thanks,  Ryan  
    • Our business was only transacted digitally as I was not in England at that time.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Run a small construction co. - client won't pay final invoice. - help RE: Small claims please ***Resolved***


Kwabena
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 778 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been thinking.  It seems unreasonable for someone to wait until a bathroom and kitchen is fitted to pay someone for the drains being fitted (which is what I assume they want to do).  No-one waits until this stage to test them...otherwise it would be to late to do anything about them as they are buried beneath the concrete slab in the living space.

 

I would say it is reasonable to test them now by pouring some water down them and seeing if it runs the right way...that's literally all there is to the bit of the drains that I did.  Should I suggest this?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means you can suggest this but I think that you should also suggest that this should be done under supervision by a professional

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,  

 

I got a reply!  Very brief but here it is....

 

Hi ****

 
When the drains are connected and have been commissioned I will be able to update you on testing of the drains.  
 
Regards

****

 

 

 

I'm thinking of sending something like this in reply

 

"When you say commissioned what is it you mean exactly? Did the contractors who fitted the external pump voice any concerns?

 
I don't think it's unreasonable of me to ask for a rough date of when you anticipate this being completed?"
 
 
 
 
Just to clarify...there is no reason to wait until everything is connected for the drains to be tested...building control may have even signed them off already (although I don't know that for sure) and generally will just require to see water being poured in one end and coming out of the other to check the fall the right way
 
Thanks
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your last sentence which I have highlighted in red makes it sound as if you are pleading.

 

"Please will you give me a date by which the system will be commissioned."

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes of course if it contributes to that discussion – but on the other hand don't hijack somebody else's thread for your own discussion

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so no reply to the last email...What are my options?  It seems unfair that I have to just wait until and unknown time in the future before I will hear back with any details of what they propose to pay for.

 

I may be able to find out if building control have already signed off the drains..would this make a difference to anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not particularly surprised you haven't received an answer and this is broadly the reason why I was gently trying to discourage you from sending this email because it reinforces the sense that you are acting as a supplicant.

It's very clear to me that these people are playing you. I think that much has been obvious right from the beginning. The problem is we don't really know what their plan is – whether to avoid paying altogether, whether to force you to some fairly brutal compromise or to be completely straight dealing with you – although this last option seems to me to be pretty unlikely.

You are asking to know what your options are now – but in fact when you send messages, you should already have your options sorted out before you send the message rather than figure what you should do now.

I think your position now is that either you sit it out and wait – or else you threaten and then bring a legal action.

I think this was your only option before. By sending your last message of course you have shown that you are reasonable and that you would like to work things are and that will go to your credit – but I think that these people are taking advantage of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suddenly had an idea which might help you to put them on the back foot.

I'm afraid that I really need to go through the whole thread again in detail and I just don't have time for that at the moment.

However I think it might be a good tactic to propose to appoint an independent assessor to go in and have a look at the work which is carried out and to give an opinion as to the quality and whether the objectives in the contract have been achieved.
I can imagine that your clients won't agree to this – but I think it would be to your advantage to have offered it. If they do agree then you should arrange to get somebody in as quickly as possible and to carry out a full inspection and written report.

You need the inspector to be as independent as possible. You would have to propose it to the other side and maybe give them an option of two or three inspectors and ask them if they object to any of them or if they would particularly like one.

This may well put you two extra expense but it will probably only be 150 quid or so.

If they don't respond to your proposal then I would begin a legal action.

If they agree to your proposal then you put the inspector in and on the basis of the report, you expect to get paid or you will begin a legal action.

If they refuse your proposal – then you begin a legal action.

This may sound all quite dramatic – but I'm trying to put you in a position where any action you take will result in a Win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I wasn't surprised not to get a reply either! Judging from one of their early emails, and the little I know of them I think the option  are going for is to try and make me accept some fairly brutal compromise.  They indicated this by their list of demands they sent early on...(see below)

 

 

In addition, there are a few issues highlighted below which will mean the final amount will be reduced:
  • For the book keeping charge that has been included won’t be covered by us, this is because we have paid a day rate that and the time taken to make the payments is covered by the reduced hours on site due to childcare arrangements.
  • For the kitchen lights we’ll purchase the replacement lights and bulbs and take the cost of this from the final amount paid.  
  • There is an excess of steel from Buildbase left on site and we are happy for you to return this to them for your account to be credited.  We’ve checked the cost on Buildbase and will reduce this from the final amount paid.  The steel is located at the side of the house (where it was left underneath the pallets), please let us know if or when you'll pick it up.  
  • Similarly there are unopened materials which could have been returned, so again we’ll reduce the final price and for the cash float there is £10 unaccounted for, so we’ll also take this from the final amount.  
So in summary, payment of the last invoice (at a reduced sum) will be held until the remaining works are completed.  This is because the contractors met on site are not confident that the work has been completed as required and because of the additional costs incurred.  
 
I’d suggest we communicate by email until this is resolved.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your other suggestion.  It would generally be a RICS qualified chartered surveyor who would get involved in any disputes,  I'm not sure if it's appropriate here though as they haven't mentioned anything about the quality of work,  which is the only thing they would come out to assess.


The drains will work...and it's unreasonable of them to hold money until they are connected.  No builder waits until the job is completed before invoicing for the drains,  they are one of the first things to go in and we can't wait months until the bathrooms are fitted for payment.  They're not asking the roofer to wait until there's a storm before paying them.

 

So from my point of view I feel like I should start an action but I don't know if this drain thing will interfere in it.  I don't know what would happen if I start the action and then before it goes to court they fit the bathroom and pay me some reduced amount for work done minus their bogus claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please check back for a reply later.
However, what would your qualified chartered surveyor cost you for a visit and a report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do thanks.  The only surveyor I know is excellent but would cost a fortune for this as he is based about 150 miles away and charges for travel.  I would estimate somewhere upwards of £500.

 

I would like to think I could get a  surveyor locally to do this kind of thing for around £300 as a guess   

Link to post
Share on other sites

300 quid sounds a lot – maybe you could just begin by getting another competent builder to give a view and a quote if necessary

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it I'm asking them to quote for...there isn't any issues as far as I can tell.  The only thing they have mentioned on the quality side is that they want to wait for the drains to be "commisioned" (whatever that means...I'm assuming the bathroom fitted) before they will communicate with me further.

 

The other things they mentioned are random deductions they feel free to impose on me (listed a couple of posts above)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You want your inspector to visit the property and conduct an inspection and appraisal of the work that was carried out and identify any defects. To advise on remedies and likely costs.

This means of course that your clients will have to be prepared to allow the inspection.

If they allow the inspection then that's excellent because you get the information you need and we can move on.

If they don't allow the inspection then they are obstructing you and I think that this puts you in an extremely powerful position and you then send your letter of claim and go to court.

There is no downside for you.

If they were here and we were advising them, I would advise them to allow the inspection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so I get this clear in my head,  are you saying that I should go ahead and get an independent survey on the whole job to show that there is nothing wrong with it and it is built to an acceptable standard?

 

Is the thinking that if the report comes back and says everything is good that I can use that in court to back up my claim?

 

The thing that would make me think twice about this is that they aren't questioning the quality of any of the work and I'm not sure if that would address the specific concerns that they raised in their initial email

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, I don't imagine that they will respond to you or else they won't permit the inspection .

That puts you in a very good position because they are being unreasonable and non-cooperative .

If they do allow the inspection then the job of the inspector will probably simply to ascertain the job and to consider that it is complete and also make a comment on the drains.

 

Because they aren't prepared to give their own commentary, it will at least give you an independent idea of their side of the story and then you'll be in a position to consider your next move which will probably be going to court.

 

All I'm trying to do is help you prepare the ground so that if you do issue proceeding - as you probably will have to do then you can do it confidently knowing that nobody can possibly say that you haven't done your best to work things out outside the litigation process

 

I don't know what else to say to you. I thought I had explained this to you and it was fairly clear .

It's your decision now. You seem to be reluctant to take this step and you seem to think that you should just go ahead and take a legal action .

You certainly could, but I think that this will put you in a better position, but it's your case to win or to lose

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if it came across that I was questioning you to hard...I guess i'm trying to figure my way through this process as it's my first time.

 

I'll get in touch with some surveyors tomorrow and get some quotes.  Once that's done should I email them and ask for their permission for an inspection?

 

I assume I shouldn't mention this is ahead of any legal action etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have any problem with being questioned hard about anything.

If we can refine our ideas then that's good .

However, I feel that all I'm doing at the moment is repeating broadly the same advice.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

Sorry for the delay posting...I've been trying to find a surveyor but it's proving harder than I thought.  Not all of them get involved in this type of stuff.  I'm waiting on someone coming back to me with a recommendation for one but no contact yet.

 

Is it worth asking the question about access for a surveyor without having one lined up?


Also,  I was speaking with building control the other day and the drains that I installed are actually signed off.  Does that change anything?


Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be better to have a surveyor lined up and then put it to the client .

However, if you can't get one lined up then put it to the client anyway to see what the response is .

When you say that the drainage is signed off, does that mean that in principle any concerns of the client has been addressed ?

Have you got written evidence that it has been signed off? If you can do that then you may be good to go

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So building control come along at various stages of a project to asses that certain aspects have been done to the required standard.  One of the things they check is the drains as they are installed,  so the drains I have installed are signed off (as in deemed acceptable by building control who are from the council and independent)

 

There is probably nothing in writing at the moment, normally the client just receives a completion certificate when the job is completed. I could speak with them monday and see if they can issue me with something to say that the drains are signed off

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I think if you can get an official independent confirmation. Then I think that it would be reasonable to send that to the client and inform them that they already know about this. That you would like them now to settle your invoice unless they would like to make clear any other objections. Don't set any time limits but I would then give them about five days and I think it is then time to threaten legal proceedings and to bring them.

I think you have got lots of communications which show that you have bent over backwards to accommodate them and they are simply being uncooperative.
I rather predict that once you threaten legal action, that they will make you an offer which may well be part of their gameplan anyway.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...