Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Murphy99 v A&L


Murphy99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6385 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help.

 

I sent my letter, (with the £10), to the Alliance and Leicester by recorded delivery on the 10th October. Two weeks later, on the 24th October, I had not had a reply, so I phoned them. They said they had no information about this, (even though the cheque had been cashed), and could I fax them a copy which I duely did. Two weeks later I had still not had even an acknowledgement from them, and contacted them again. Again I was told that they did not have the information, and could I fax another copy. This time I asked the lady to whom I spoke to call me when she had received the information, which she duely did. However, the 40 days are up on the 19th November, (5 days time) and I am yet to receive any written acknowledgement. What should I do now??

Link to post
Share on other sites

they all do the same... will do anything to make you wait. Use this link, it has the letter that you need, think its number 3. I would call them and say the same over the phone also, it may get them quicker.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Josamolly for your reply.

 

I phoned the Alliance and Leicester on Monday 20th November to tell them I was going to take them to court if I had not received information pertaining to my account within 7 days. The gentleman I spoke to told me that the information would be with me by the end of the week. Yesterday I received this letter in the post. Any comments in blue are my own.

 

Thank you for your enquiry of 20th November. (I sent a recorded delivery letter on the 9th October)

 

It may be helpful if I explain that at the Alliance and Leicester, processing begins at the end of the working day and will continue until the early hours of the following morning. Once complete, all transactions presented to us for payment will debit the appropriate account. If there are insufficent funds in the account at the time, transactions will fail. A decision is made to either pay or reverse the failed items and the approprate charge is raised in accordance with our charging policy and published tariff. Should a balance exceed agreed limits for more than one day (more than two days prior to 1 July 2006) in a statement month, Unauthorised Overdrawing fee will be incurred, which are notified by statement 14 days prior to debiting the account. Ideally, we would like to be able to discuss such situations with individual customers, however, this is not practical, as we must make decisions within strict timescale. (When I have spoken to their customer services before about a direct debit, they said that there was nothing they could do to allow it to go through, as it is all automated!)

Alliance and Leicester has a range of great value current account products offering market leading rates and in return we ask customers to operate via the self-serve facilities available. Whilst balances are provided for guidance, I am sure you will agree that it is advisable for customers to keep a record of transactions to ensure sufficient funds are available to meet payments falling due. We beliueve our charges are reasonable and competitive compared with the industry and are clearly shown within our literature and on our website, as together with timescales, which clearly should be allowed for making credits and debits to your account.

 

It may help if I can explain why charges were raised on your account in this instance. (I never ask about charges, I merely sent out a Subject Access Request). On 6th Novemberyour account was charged £5.56 interest and your monthly overdraft charge of £5 as previously confirmed in your October statement. Due to insufficient funds in the account to cover the charges your account went overdrawn by £6.79 resulting in overdrwan charges of £50.00 due on 5th December.

 

Whilst I am satisfied that the charges have been raised correctly, I have arranged to refund the fees totalling £50.00 due on your account 5th December as a gesture of goodwill. I have ensured knock on chages of £50.00 due in January will also be refunded. Please be aware of the steps you can take to prevent charges being raised, as future charges raised correctly will stand.

 

I hope we will now be able to draw this matter to a close and if I do not hear from you within the next 8 weeks, will assume this is the case. However in accordance with regulatory requirements, I am enclosing our leaflet which explains the steps you would need to take if you wish to pursue this matter further, including the ultimate availability of the Financial Ombudsman Service."

 

At no point have I ever talked to them about any individual charges. They have not sent any other information concerning the Subject access request. What should I do now? Any advice would be very welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Hi,

 

right well, this may take a while but it is the correct procedure to follow. Complain to the ICO here....

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/forms/data_protection_complaints_form.pdf

 

Send in the complaint form and within a week or two (from my own experience) you'll get a ref no. When I did this with Abbey it took about 2 weeks and strangely enough 2 days after I had confirmation from the ICO of my complaint Abbey sent the statements:rolleyes:

 

Don't correspond with them now about this other than a short sharp letter informing them of your actions.

 

Wxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have sent the first letter asking for my charges to be refunded, and they have come back with their standard letter regarding their charges being fair. The only problem I have is that the amount they owe me at the moment is £3970.00 plus interest, (currently £965.09), a total of £4935.09, which is getting close to £5000, which is I believe the maximum you can claim in the small claims court. What happens if the figure goes above £5000 before we get to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Murphy99

 

You can ask the judge when you fill in the allocation questionaire to keep your claim on small track, as you are a consumer with limited funds. We can help you with that nearer the time if you have to fill out the Aq.

Is this your first letter asking for it back? How did you work out the interest?

 

Uk..

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts moved into your own bank group

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...