Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Claim Against EVRi - Damaged and unusable. **SETTLED BEFORE HEARING**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

After reading the many invaluable accounts on CAG, I think I have case to bring against Hermes and would like some advice on this please.

 

I sold two light fittings to the same buyer on eBay and paid for postage (both lights together) using Hermes via Packlink. The value of both lights was £250 and I also paid for enhanced compensation. I bought proper packaging material and a suitably sized box from a packaging retailer. I packaged the items extremely well and took photos of the packaged items.

 

Annoyingly, several weeks later the buyer reported the lights as damaged and requested a full refund via eBay (they were just within the refund window). I opened a claim with Packlink uploading necessary photos of the packaging and lights before and after the damage. Packlink completed their initial investigation stating that;

 

Quote

“After completing the investigation with the carrier the shipment has been confirmed as damaged. I am writing to let you know that the dossier has been transferred to the Claims department for the final evaluation.”

 

However, their claims department incorrectly asserted that I had used Packing Paper and rejected the claim due to insufficient packaging. I have tried to get them to reconsider based upon their incorrect identification of the packaging material – it was Shredded Cardboard much thicker than Packing Paper. But so far they have not come back to me.

 

I’ve tried to contact Hermes but can’t get beyond their automated bot with my reference number, as it just tells me to take it up with Packlink.

 

Do you feel I have a case to start a Money Claim against Hermes based upon the following points;

 

  1. The damage inflicted upon the lights (they were very badly bent and misshaped), suggests that they were subjected to manhandling far in excess of that you would expect in transit.
  2. And given the fact that Packlink stated that “the carrier has confirmed that the shipment was damaged”.

 

Any advice much appreciated. If I do start a claim, I’ll update this post with all the details.

 

Thanks
🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably you have photographs of the damaged lamps.

Have you supplied these to Hermes? Have you begun a formal complaint against Hermes?

If you haven't done then begin that now and in the meantime read around all the stories on these sub- forums so that you understand the way it goes.

After about 10 days, if you have been knocked back or if you haven't heard anything then we will help you send them a letter of claim.

In addition to reading up on the stories here, please draft a letter of claim and post it here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I've got photos of the damaged lights and all the packaging. Can upload photos here if that would be helpful?

 

Haven't started formal proceedings yet, just wanted some advice on the strength of my case. Will kick things off this week if you think I have a case?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't need to see the photos – but you do need to do the reading. Once you have done all the reading of the stories on the sub- forum then you will understand the strength of your case.

This forum is about self empowerment – although we will guide you.

Begin your formal complaint and then start doing your reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

I've been doing my reading around on this forum and have issued Hermes with a Letter of Claim

 

They have responded by directing me to Packlink and denying that Hermes is responsible.

 

My letter of Claim gave Hermes 14 days before I commence legal proceedings. I've drafted the Claim Details and chronology which I'll post below. If someone can offer any feedback, it would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Hi
Sorry for not responding sooner. I’ve only just had to reimburse the eBay buyer for the items they purchased which were damaged and crushed during the Hermes delivery.


I’ve been reading around the different Hermes/Packlink topics on the forum as well as reading the official government guidance and I think this is the course of action I have to take;


1. Send formal Letter of Claim to Hermes (uploaded below) informing them of the damage to my shipment, my financial loss and giving them 14 days to reimburse me before I take action in the County Court.


2. Start the Money Claim online. I’m a bit confused which of the two system I should use – can you advise?
 

WWW.MONEYCLAIM.GOV.UK
WWW.GOV.UK

How to take legal action if someone owes you money (small claims court), how much it costs, what happens next. Includes information...


3. As part of completing the online claim I will submit a Particulars of Claim detailing the facts of the case and timeline of events (uploaded below).


4. Hermes will probably send a standard letter disputing my claim at which point I will be sent an additional questionnaire by the Court and asked to pay extra court fees. I should both fill out the questionnaire and pay the fees as well as agreeing to mediation if applicable.


5. Should it go to mediation then I’ll follow the advice offered within this forum.
Any pointers and advice much appreciated. I’ll be posting the Letter of Claim to Hermes in the next day or two pending any feedback.

 

 

 

Quote

Claim Details with Chronology

 

 

 

The claimant used the defendants courier service to deliver a parcel containing two Laura Ashley ceiling lights value £250 to an address in Surrey. The claimant took out insurance against damage or loss caused by the defendant's own breach of contract or negligence. When the parcel arrived at the destination the contents were so badly crushed and damaged that the recipient requested a refund. This was caused by the defendant’s own breach of contract or negligence. The claimant brings this action under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Claimant seeks the value of the lights £250 plus delivery and insurance costs £9.99 under the County Courts act 1984

 

The following is a detailed chronology of the events surrounding this claim.

 

26/09/2021

The claimant sold two Laura Ashley ceiling lights in excellent condition on eBay. The buyer paid £250 for the lights plus £9.99 postage.

 

27/09/2021

The claimant purchased suitable heavy-duty cardboard box and shock absorbent packaging material from a specialist parcel and packing retailer.

The claimant packaged up the items with considerable care and attention. The packaging consisted of a sturdy new cardboard box securely sealed and marked as fragile. The majority of the packaging used was good quality shock absorbent shredded cardboard. In addition, foam, polystyrene filler and bubble wrap was also used to fill any voids and provide additional strength and shock absorbance. In all, the packaging was more than sufficient to withstand the normal bumps and vibration expected during transit. It more than conformed to the packaging guidance on Hermes own website that states, “Your parcel needs to be wrapped well enough to stay intact should it fall off a conveyor belt (which can be up to 1.2m high).” -  https://www.myhermes.co.uk/help-and-support/how-to-wrap-a-parcel

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - The light fittings in excellent condition prior to postage.

 - The comprehensive packaging of the items using the suitable packaging materials mentioned above.

 

 

 

28/09/2021

The claimant purchased a Hermes delivery Label and paid for additional insurance for the protection against loss or damage for the shipment.

The Hermes Tracking ID is H0067A0030190134.

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - The purchased Hermes postage label with additional insurance cover

 

29/09/2021

Shipment started its short journey from Brighton, East Sussex to Surrey.

 

 

27/10/2021

After receiving the shipment from Hermes, the buyer of the lights initiates an eBay returns request citing that the lights where so badly damaged that they are unusable. The buyer requests a full refund including postage costs.

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - The badly crushed and damaged metal light fittings upon delivery by Hermes

 

 

28/10/2021

After being unable to discuss the matter with Hermes customer service instead the claimant open a damage claim with Packlink whom the Hermes postage label was purchased from.

 

01/11/2021

Packlink update the damage claim stating "After completing the investigation with the carrier the shipment has been confirmed as damaged"

 

See uploaded photo evidence illustrating;

 - Packlink statement that their investigation with the carrier confirmed the shipment was damaged.

 

03/11/2021

Packlink incorrectly assert that packing paper was used for the shipment and dismissed the claim. The claimant immediately responded pointing out that no packing paper had been used and that the materials used were good quality shock absorbent shredded cardboard, foam, polystyrene filler and bubble wrap sealed in a new sturdy box. However, Packlink ignored these responses and offered no means for appeal.

 

23/11/2021

eBay completes the returns process by refunding the £250 plus £9.99 postage to the buyer having deducts the funds from my bank account.

 

See uploaded evidence illustrating;

 - The Claimants eBay Financial Statement for November 2021 showing total claims of £259.99 for the refund of the two lights.

 

29/11/2021

As Packlink are not based in the UK and are not under the jurisdiction of English County Courts, the claimants only hope of getting compensation for the financial loss incurred due to a breach of duty and care of services (under the Consumer Rights Act 2015), is to issue Hermes with a Letter of Claim with the threat to start legal action in 14 days if not financially reimbursed.

The claimant is being this action as a beneficial third-party under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

 

 

03/12/2021

 

Hermes acknowledges the claimant’s letter and provide details of the claim case number and how to respond.

 

07/12/2021

 

The claimant responds to Hermes reiterating the circumstances and that unless they work to resolve the matter the claimant will have no choice to claim against Hermes under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 in the County Courts.

 

08/12/2021

 

Unfortunately, Hermes responds by stating that they are unable to assist further with the matter and they update the status of this internal claim as solved.

 

See uploaded evidence illustrating;

-          Hermes complaint communications between the claimant and Hermes.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've crossed out a passage which is irrelevant and I have added an important statement in red.

It looks extremely comprehensive – and well done on having all the photographs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, thanks for you speedy response.

 

One question I have regarding starting the Money Claim. Do I use the Money Claim Online website or the new online claim service at Gov.uk? It seems like the newer service offers a better experience for filing the details of claim. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about a new one. Please post a link

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the direct link to starting a claim on the service is

 

I see that it is in beta so it is still being trialled.

By means go ahead and try it out. I expect that it all leads to the same place in the end but maybe you can let us know what you think about it.

It certainly looks more friendly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi

 

Apologies for not updating this thread recently, my claim is still ongoing although nothing much has happened yet. 

 

After receiving the expected defendants response from EVRi disputing the claim, they had agreed to mediation. After waiting to hear a date for mediation, EVRi must have then decided against it as I received notification that - "Mediation did not resolve the claim" and the claim will go to a hearing.

 

I was sent a Judgement Order requesting me to submit my witness statement to the court and 'the other side', including any other witness statements and accompanying documents.

 

I don't want to deviate from the evidence I've already submitted so I was going to just send the court and EVRi a copy of my claim form as my witness statement. I will also include photos and other evidence along with a witness statement from my partner. Does this all sound ok?

 

Many thanks for your continued support and advice   

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you fluff out your claim points and Inc exhibits

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you don't send anything until we have looked at it and agreed it with you. We may have some useful information to contribute .

What is the date for submission of your court bundle?

 

Have you received their court bundle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that you haven't uploaded a copy of the defence .

I think we need to see this please .

Please could you upload a copy of the defence in PDF format. Redact it for your own contact details of course

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness Statement.pdf

 

See my uploaded redacted witness statement. This is a version of my submitted claim form formatted based upon the following criteria specified in the Judgement Order;

 

 

Quote

 

A witness statement must

  •   have the court case number at the top

  •   start with the witness’ name and address

  •   it must contain numbered paragraphs and should be typed and

    double spaced. If not typed, it must be written clearly in block

    capitals or printed.

  •   finish with the words “I believe the facts set out above to be true.

    I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth”, the date of the statement and the person’s signature.

 

  •  

 

Sorry I need to spend a bit of time redacting the defence. I'll do it for tomorrow evening.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, we definitely need to see the defence.

 

I'm afraid that you're witness statement needs a lot of work and also it could probably be shorter. I would normally suggest not more than two sides .

You haven't told us the date for submission and you haven't told us if you have received their bundle

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 is a Sunday. Is it really then?

 

Don't send it yet.

 

to follow up, it's important that we see your witness statement and that we make our suggestions in respect of it.

 

Of course there is nothing to stop you going it alone, but your interest will be best served if we can see your defence and then help you to frame an appropriate witness statement.

 

Also, it will be best to leave it to the last moment in case you receive their bundle in time and you can see their witness statement which will give you clues about how to frame your own one .

 

Are you required to file these documents by post or by email?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Yes, we definitely need to see the defence.

 

I'm afraid that you're witness statement needs a lot of work and also it could probably be shorter. I would normally suggest not more than two sides .

You haven't told us the date for submission and you haven't told us if you have received their bundle

 

 

 

Attached is a redacted copy of EVRi defence.

 

I'm happy to edit my witness statement (previously uploaded) if you feel it should be shorter? In addition to my witness statement I was also going to include a witness statement from my partner corroborating my account.

 

 

EVRi Submitted Defence.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there is any need to have corroborative evidence from your partner- although what is it that they might say if they do make a statement ?

 

As far as I can see, the defence is predicated simply on the fact that you don't have third party rights to sue them.

 

However, your witness statement has brought up other issues which aren't relevant according to their defence .

Strictly speaking, they should not be entitled to introduce any issues once they have filed their defence. But of course it will be helpful to see what they are going in their witness statement if we can get it before you file yours .

 

You have paid an insurance even though it is unenforceable. But the important thing is that they have accepted the insurance .

 

Only other issue I can see is that they might say that your lights were on the prohibited items list.

 

In What way were they damaged please?

L

You may already have told us but maybe you could tell us about it again .

 

Of course, by accepting an insurance specifically for this lighting, they effectively invalidate the effect of any prohibited items.

At the moment this is the only new issue I can see being raised which might disrupt the process .

 

But the fact that they sold you insurance effectively moves that basis of any defence they might produce later.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you haven't confirmed that the date is indeed Sunday the 24th .

Also, you haven't addressed my question as to how must this material be filed. By post or by email?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry my mistake, material needs to be sent before 4pm 26th April.

The instructions say that the material needs to be sent to the court using the address given. So I'll post two sets of material to the court and EVRi
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. That makes more sense.

 

These documents are generally speaking submitted on a Tuesday.

So I was surprised.

 

In that case, let's wait until the weekend of the 23rd and 24th to sort it out. I will have access to a better computer as well .

Maybe you can give a shout out to me on this thread on the Friday in case it slips my mind.

 

In the meantime, you should certainly assemble your documents following broadly the advice that we have given in the court bundle link including index page, etc.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a matter of interest, when did you receive the court order? Informing you about the court bundle and the date for filing it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...