Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
    • Personally I would strongly suggest not risking going there with debts. Very possible you wont get back out again. And I know many in that position. Not jailed just unable to leave. the stories of Interpol in other countries sounds far fetched but in and out of Dubai is not a good idea. only two weeks ago a mate got stopped albeit a govt debt.
    • BTW the time in and out is less than 10 mins, more than 5 in case that's relevant? I saw an article posted on here about a year ago a proposed legislation change but i don't know if that went through or not? I'm also a blue badge holder but there it was a regular parking spot.   Private parking fines to be capped at £50 WWW.BBC.CO.UK Drivers will also need to be given a grace period for lateness, as part of a crackdown on parking firms.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dealing with Vanquis and Lowell CaT Debt


mrdonj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 713 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi CAG. Figured I'd ask for some advice for two debts that I have

 

Debt 1 - Vanquis Credit Card.

As things are right now, I owe £2400 (£150 over agreed limit).

 

Due to mental health issues, I've had the account frozen for roughly 2 years. They have not added any interest to the account and my credit is reported as ok each month.

 

Each month I'm sent a statement recommending I pay the £150 if I can, but that I am not required to. The account of course won't be frozen forever and I would like to avoid a default on this account.

 

Would it be advisable to arrange a payment plan with Vanquis once the account freeze is over?

 

Debt 2 - Debt sold to Lowell (originally with Very).

Defaulted in October 2019.

Have been making £1 payments since.

 

Haven't dealt with a DCA that didn't involve being sent a claimform so not sure how to proceed in terms of cancelling the DD and challenging them to prove the debt is mine (if that is a solution).

Link to post
Share on other sites

just start paying vanquis what you can when you can

 

as for lowlife send them a cca request

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers, will get on to it with "lowlife"

 

Edit: In regards to the current £1 plan I have with them. Do I cancel the DD or leave things as they are until the result of the CCA request?

Edited by mrdonj
additional query
Link to post
Share on other sites

if they fail to respond within 12+2 working days....yes

 

dx

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Just wondering what my next course of action should be.

 

I am uploading what they sent to me a few weeks ago. I didn't include the full list of purchases since I'd need to redact all of it.

 

I'd like to avoid them sending a claim if possible

 

 

 

Lowell CCA Request.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Dealing with Vanquis and Lowell CaT Debt

urm..

quite interesting really

16th they send the CCA stuff.

18th they offer an 80% discount but cant calculate 80% of £2100 .. but why give that amount of massive discount

and 

include 2 documents with your details on that claim to be the agreement you digitally signed upto...urmmmmmmmm

 

IMHO something smells which is why the discount.?

i'd see where they go if/to letter of claim 

 

it also pains me you came here in 2015, you know all about CCA from your past threads, but have continued to blindly pay them, even after earlier advice in this thread too.

 

dx

 

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be honest. It is the amount that scared me back when I started making payments, then forgot about it for a while and had other stuff going on, hence the delay.

 

I do find it odd that they'd offer such a large discount too.

 

The discount seems correct to me? 80% of £2624.62 is £524.

 

List of items purchased seems about right with what I'd bought in the past.

 

So cancel DD and see if the go ahead with a claim in the future?

Edited by mrdonj
Link to post
Share on other sites

This definitely looks like they know it's unenforceable! also many of those pages uploaded are either totally unsigned or you have the best redacting skills I've seen :D

 

So such a large discount within days of you showing you are likely to start challenging it, is a standard practice in the hopes you will see a bargain and rather pay to 'save yourself the hassle' than defend. It is also likely that even with 80% discount, they would make a profit on their purchase.

 

I personally would stop paying and wait, as dx says, for if they send a letter of claim. At which point you request even more documents they won't have

 

BT

  • Like 1

CAG Site Team and Forum Helpers are unpaid volunteers

Over the years CAG has probably helped hundreds of thousands of people, only a small number of people come back and let us know what happened or to say thank you

and an even smaller number of people ever think to make a donation.

If you are able, without leaving yourself short, consider donating, all donations go towards Site hosting and maintenance - help us stay live for future people in need.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

 

Essential Reading: Dealing with Customer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...