Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that information. I seem to think they have similar names and similar addresses and I thought it was Aldi that was offering the great deal that attracted you to that car park. So we are still stuck with Nexus. Please do not call DCBL about a settlement figure.The first reason is that they have your telephone number which is not something you want to give to those vultures as you rightly call them. They will then harass you on the phone and try and send you last minute details the day before the case -which they shouldn't do. And second they are already charging you £60 to £70 more than they should lawfully, to that they will then add the Court costs that they haven't yet paid or incurred and then say that they will give you this great offer of £150 to avoid going to court.Big deal-not. Were it around £50 that would be a better deal but they would not accept that.   
    • Hugo, how are you getting on? the deadlines can creep up on you. It's useful to have a week or two in drafting a defence, so you can understand it for yourself before submitting. Read other like threads for examples and tailor to suit you. Get one drafted and posted (without personal info) and let us take a look
    • OK thx jk2054 I'll go that route, does anybody have any positive reviews of NWNF law firms they've had experience with? I did consider InjuryLawyers4u, but apparently they're more of a broker, & who you end up dealing with can be hit & miss.  Would rather try & get a sharp firm that are on-top of things if possible.   
    • I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

re Information Commissioners letter


,hills
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6383 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am at MCOL stage myself with Barclaycard and have found the forums advice excellent, only got the normal 2 years back statements, then times'ed them by 2 to get 6 years estimate, had the offer, refused and waiting for defense etc....

 

I am helping my friend with his Barclaycard claim, and have only just sent off the SAR. Although I am getting the hang of the process, I am reading through he threads that people are going via the Information Commissioners Office complaining about the Microfiche excuse and that they are now getting success in obtaining the full 6 years worth of their statements.

 

My questions are, that my friend has probalbly not used or had access to his card for nearly 2 years, so when/if he gets his 2 years statements it may well show nothing that he can estimate his charges on (he is currently on a payment plan for £850 he owes them). But almost certainly the previous 4 years were where the heavy charges were imposed and which is where he would be able to claim most of which, if not all of what he owes Barclaycard.

 

answers please :

 

- Are Barclaycard now giving the 6 years statements as requested by the SAR

 

- If not, do you have to write to the Information Commissioners Office complaining that you are not getting them

 

- Is there a standard letter to complain to the ICO.

 

Once/If the 6 years statements are received I am sure my mate will be very happy.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bump for this as I'm in a similar situation to your friend. My account is now closed as I paid off all the money I owed them (before I knew about this place!) but a massive chunk of it was made up of charges from more than 2 years ago.

 

Anyone able to shed any light on hills questions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am at MCOL stage myself with Barclaycard and have found the forums advice excellent, only got the normal 2 years back statements, then times'ed them by 2 to get 6 years estimate, had the offer, refused and waiting for defense etc....

 

I am helping my friend with his Barclaycard claim, and have only just sent off the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). Although I am getting the hang of the process, I am reading through he threads that people are going via the Information Commissioners Office complaining about the Microfiche excuse and that they are now getting success in obtaining the full 6 years worth of their statements.

 

My questions are, that my friend has probalbly not used or had access to his card for nearly 2 years, so when/if he gets his 2 years statements it may well show nothing that he can estimate his charges on (he is currently on a payment plan for £850 he owes them). But almost certainly the previous 4 years were where the heavy charges were imposed and which is where he would be able to claim most of which, if not all of what he owes Barclaycard.

 

answers please :

 

- Are Barclaycard now giving the 6 years statements as requested by the SAR --NO they are not

 

- If not, do you have to write to the Information Commissioners Office complaining that you are not getting them --YES you do.

 

- Is there a standard letter to complain to the Information Commissioners Office. Not on this site that I have found

 

Once/If the 6 years statements are received I am sure my mate will be very happy.

 

Thanks again.

 

Answers after the questions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a standard letter to complain to the Information Commissioners Office. Not on this site that I have found

 

 

Standard complaint form is here

 

Data Protection Complaints – Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)

 

skb

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here guys, had two years of statments that had no money on them, cheeky beggars as i too paid my card off but didnt close my account. Ive made my complaint to the commisioners , but not heard anything from them yet, but i did resend my "im annoyed" letter to barclaycard telling them of the recent ico findings and the fact i was complaining. Im still hopeful that i dont have to fork out for he earlier statments which could be an option for your friend Hills?

Nadia.

 

 

------------------------------------------------

Barclays Current Account - S.A.R 22/09/06 - Prelim sent 23/10/06 - part pay accepted - sent LBA 16/11/06 - Payment out of court March 07. Hooray!

Capital One Credit Card - Sent S.A.R 22/09/06 - statements recived 30/10/06 - Settled Dec 06.

Egg Credit Card - Sent S.A.R 22/09/06 - statements recieved 30/10/06- about to send prelim

Barclaycard - S.A.R 22/09/06 - Microfishe letter - non com. 29/09/06. - wont comply letter - 16/10/06 16 days left- getting nowhere letter back! 16/11/06 Information Commissioners Office compaint - 18/12/06-Statments sent - prelim going out 24/5/07.

Virgin/MBNA - S.A.R 22/09/06 - part pay accepted - settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read this, it should make disturbing reading for Peter Townsend (DATA CONTROLLER OF BARCLAYS BANK if Judge Forrester is reading) assuming he doesnt want become a guest of Her Majesty.

 

(Avoid the showers, Peter, and dont go into the greenhouse, what ever you do!)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=43&Itemid=2

 

 

Non disclosure imprisonment threat against RBS Data Controller! pdf_button.png printButton.png emailButton.png

A Consumer Action Group User was today (21/11/06) granted a County Court order in respect of the failure by the Royal Bank of Scotland to comply with his disclosure request under the Data Protection Act.

District judge Forrester, making the order commented that had the claimant been able to supply him with the name of the data controller

at the Royal Bank of Scotland that he would have added a threat of imprisonment for non-compliance.

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland now has until January 2007 to comply with the users subject access request. The District Judge has indicated that if the Bank has not complied with the order by that time that he may make an order for imprisonment of the RBS Data controller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey ho! This letter sent today! Happy Christmas Barclaycard!

 

 

Mr. Carl Nuttall

Customer Relationship Manager

Barclaycard

PO BOX 599

M603NF

 

Your ref: 10022Z32

Our ref: BC3

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

Breach of your obligations

 

Dear Sir,

 

BARCLAYCARD CARD ACCOUNT NUMBER xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I refer to my letter of 2nd December. You are now in breach of your obligations under the Data Protection Act.

 

I note your failure to supply me with statements held prior to May 2004 and your contention that this is because they are held on microfiche which “does not constitute a relevant filing system.” I do not accept your position and draw your attention to the Information Commissioners Office [information Commissioners Office] rejection of a very similar argument advanced by the Abbey National Bank earlier this year.

 

I understand that Barclaycard has now been visited by representatives from the Information Commissioners Office and that the Information Commissioners Office have ruled, contrary to your contention, that the microfiche system is indeed a “relevant filing system” and that therefore you are obliged, under the Data Protection Act, to supply the information so held within 40 days of a request

 

You have failed to do so and I have therefore today made a formal complaint to the Information Commissioners Office. I shall also commence legal action to force disclosure and would in that context draw your attention to a recent posting on the Consumer Action Group website:

 

“A Consumer Action Group User was today (21/11/06) granted a County Court order in respect of the failure by the Royal Bank of Scotland to comply with his disclosure request under the Data Protection Act.

District judge Forrester, making the order commented that had the claimant been able to supply him with the name of the data controller at the Royal Bank of Scotland that he would have added a threat of imprisonment for non-compliance.

The Royal Bank of Scotland now has until January 2007 to comply with the users subject access request. The District Judge has indicated that if the Bank has not complied with the order by that time that he may make an order for imprisonment of the RBS Data controller”.

 

I suggest you may wish to bring this to the attention of your Data Controller as I assure you I will not hesitate to use the full force of the law against you if you continue to fail to comply with your obligations under it.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

xxxxxxxxxx

 

cc: Data Controller Barclaycard

Chief Executive Barclaycard

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Does anyone know if Barclaycard and Barclays Bank have the same Data Controller?

 

Hapy Christmas Barclaycard.

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would we have a case to file the claim directly against their named Data Controller, rather than 'Barclaycard PLC'?

 

:D Now that could be fun!:D

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm

 

Good point but guess they are an employee so maybe not personally liable. Still the Judge seems to think so with the RBS. Shall we ask the ICO? Might be worth a letter to the Barclays CEO!

 

Happy Christmas Barclaycard

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...