Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
    • I didn’t say it wouldn’t. That is not the issue here. To continue driving after the licence has expired (under s88), the driver must have submitted a “qualifying application”.  An application disclosing a relevant medical condition (of which sleep apnoea is one) is not a “qualifying application”, This means the driver cannot take advantage of s88 and must wait for the DVLA to make its decision before resuming driving.   The driver’s belief is irrelevant. The fact that a licence was eventually granted may mitigate the offence, but does it does not provide a defence.   But this driver didn’t meet the conditions. I explained why in my earlier post. He only meets the conditions if his application does not declare a relevant medical condition. His did.   As I explained, after his birthday he did not hold a licence that could be revoked.   In my view it doesn’t matter what it says. The offence is committed because his application declared a medical condition. Meanwhile his licence expired and s88 is not available to him. The GP letter would form part of the material the DVLA would use to complete their investigations. But until those enquiries are completed he could not drive.   The offence does not carry points or a disqualification (because a licence could have been held by your father). It only carries a fine and the guideline is half a week’s net income. If he pleads guilty that fine will be reduced by a third. He will also pay a surcharge of 40% of that fine. But the big difference is prosecution costs: a guilty plea will see costs of about £90 ordered whilst being convicted following a trial will see costs in the region of £600.
    • I'd recommend getting a new thread started about this. Let us help!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SSE massive bill about to land!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, bit of an odd one here - and I'm at my wits end, frankly.

 

We have a standard meter - once in a while someone comes round to read it - other times they ask me for a reading, which I supply. Oddly, though, whenever a bill arrived, the reading was always "estimated".

 

The last time I received a request for a reading, back in June, I submitted the new reading - I was then contacted by the meter reading company who said that the reading was outside of the expected range - could I please take a photograph of the meter just to make sure. I took the photo and sent it to them to confirm that my reading was correct, which they confirmed and said that they'd submit to SSE.

 

The bill comes through and, guess what? Yup - it's estimated!

 

At this point I start to think that something's not right and compare the estimated reading (80822) against the reading that I'd taken (92676) - a difference of 11,854! Now I'm thinking "wow - that could be a couple of hundred quid that I owe them" and attempt to work out what the difference is - based on 17.93p per kWh, that's an outstanding amount of £2,125.42!

 

What the hell??

 

Anyhow - on the 1st of July I contact them and tell them that I already submitted a reading - and what's this estimated 80822 reading about?? They apologise and take a new reading from me (92808) and assure me that it has now been recorded.

 

A few days go by and I get another email saying that my bill is now ready - I go and have a look at it - yup, you guessed it, it's estimated!

 

So, on the 16th of July, I call them again - I'm now starting to get a bit wound up by this - why are they doing this? Is it because it's likely that they'd have to write off the extra? I tell the person on the phone that I have already submitted two readings - neither of which are anywhere near what's on the bill and both of which have been ignored. The operator is, once again, extremely apologetic and asks me to give her another reading (92972 this time) and that an amended bill will be produced within the next 3 to 5 working days.

 

On Friday 23rd I receive an email saying that my new bill is ready... This time it says that the bill is based on the reading that I gave them! But the reading is 81656! I've *NEVER* given them that number! They're closed over the weekend so, first thing this morning I'm on the phone to them - they tell me that I phoned in that reading on the 22nd (I didn't) plus, even if I had, the new bill takes 3 to 5 working days - this one came out the next damn day! Someone there has just entered some random number and said that it's the reading that I gave them!

 

What do I do? There's no way in hell that I can afford to pay £2,000+ extra - and, I may add, doesn't entering random numbers as readings count as some sort of fraud?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start off by sending them a subject access request. This is always the way to begin any dispute – especially a billing dispute against a utilities company.

You need to go about information gathering – very methodically before you launch into any action. Although it will take 30 days, it really isn't worth beginning until you have the full story.

Presumably you have kept the photographs et cetera that you have taken?

And in future – as a lesson – start taking photographs of every time you take a meter reading

Link to post
Share on other sites

While getting a SAR going two other things I 'd check:

 

1.  Is the meter number that is shown on their bills correct, ie is it the same as the number that's on your meter?

 

2. How often do you get a new bill normally? Quarterly? Monthly? In June you read it to be 92676 and they estimated it at 80822. If you get Quarterly bills what reading was shown on the bill they sent you in March/April? Was that shown as an Estimated reading or a Customer reading?

 

Which company are you with? [EDIT sorry, It's in the thread title, SSE] Have you changed supplier recently, or have you been with them for a long time?

 

Do you get just electricity from them or gas as well?

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And to add – check that the day readings and the night readings haven't been transposed.

Believe it or not there are several cases on this forum where the meters have been connected the wrong way round

Link to post
Share on other sites

why don't you register on the SSE website and input regular, correct readings yourself?

 

SSE.CO.UK

Find out how to submit a meter reading online or by phone, and learn more on how we use your reading.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I either have someone knock on the door or a get a letter asking me to submit a reading - which I do through their web site (so I am signed up). The problem is that they've been ignoring the reading and coming out with an estimate!

Edited by Mandorallan
Link to post
Share on other sites

well they cant ignore them if you do it direct to their website.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did it on their web site

- I got an estimated bill

- they'd ignored the reading.

 

Their own people came out and read it

- I got an estimated bill

- they'd ignored the reading.

 

I rang them and got the operator to update the reading (three times!)

- I got an estimated bill

- not only had they ignored the reading,

they reset it to an estimated value! 

 

The last time they set it to a much lower figure that I never gave them, but shows on the bill as the current reading!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent the SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think you should make sure you do. I suggested it seven hours ago and the more this discussion goes, the more it is clear that you need to know what information they have on file

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK, so - the CAB suggested that I put in one of their standard letters demanding that they adjust my bill as, by OFGEM's rules, they can't bill for anything older than a year (to stop exactly this - estimated bill piling up a huge outstanding balance). So far I've not heard a peep from them - not even an acknowledgement that they've received either of the letters. Do I go to OFGEM now?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hows the sar going.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they only have 30days

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

inform the ICO they have failed

 

pers i'd not be sending any pointless letter tennis until you have the data.

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they don't respond to the sar then the next step will be to send them a letter of claim and then to issue a county court claim.

 

Keep us updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had the following land in my email:

 

Quote

 

Dear XXXXXXXXX,

 

Complaint Reference:  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


An update on your complaint

I would like to apologise that you have had reason to raise a complaint with SSE and want to reassure you that I am doing everything I can to help resolve this matter for you.  I would also like to thank you for the patience you have shown while we work towards a resolution.

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 27th July 2021 and I understand you are requesting a Subject Access Request for all information we hold about you.  

 

I tried to call you but could not reach you so I left a voicemail message on your mobile telephone number and also I sent a text message.  I have also sent off the form for a Subject Access Request to be sent to you. This information to be gathered and sent to you via email within one calendar month.

 

As all actions have not been taken to resolve your complaint, I have added your complaint into our diary and you will receive a call back from a member of our team within the next 6 weeks. However if you would like to discuss this sooner, please get in touch on: 0345 071 9853 where one of my colleagues will be happy to help. Our lines are open from 0830-1700.

 

 

We've not had any phones ring (so they may have an incorrect number for us) - it's taken them almost a month just to acknowledge the SAR...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received the form but they say they have sent you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Dear xxx

 


 Reference number xxx  -- Letter of Claim

 


 Thank you for your message dated xxx date concerning the subject access request which I sent to you on the 27th of July.

 

 I note that it seems that you have not even started to fulfil the statutory disclosure request despite the fact that the 30-day deadline  runs from the date that you received the request.

To give you a little extra margin we will say that it was received by you on the 1st of August 2021 and this means that if I do not receive the disclosure by the 30th of August that you will have breached your statutory obligations under the Data Protection Act.

 

You say that you have sent me a form but no form has been received and furthermore no telephone calls have been received and no messages have been left on my voicemail service.

 

In any event  it is clear from the data protection rules and confirmed on the website of the Information Commissioner that you are not entitled to require any particular formalities to be completed.  The only condition for supplying me with the statutory disclosure is that you are satisfied as to my identity.

 Given that you have no problem sending bills to my address and also discussing other aspects of my account with me at my address or my email address, there is clearly no question as to my identity.

 

 Even if there were questions as to my identity you would not be entitled to use this to delay the 30-day deadline. It is clear from the information commissioner’s website that you must start preparing the data disclosure as soon as you receive the request in any form  and then as long as you are satisfied as to my identity you must make the  disclosure.


The message which you have just sent me confirm that you have received my subject access request but it suggests very strongly that you will not be complying with your statutory obligations on time.  This is causing me distress and I hope that the explanation that I have given above as to how to comply with the data protection rules is helpful to you and will result in a full disclosure of all data you hold on me without any more of  this nonsense by the expiry of a deadline on the 30th of August.

 

However,  and for the avoidance of doubt, if you do not comply with your statutory obligations then I shall begin a County Court action against you for breach of your statutory duty at the end of 14 days from the date of this letter and without any further notice to you.

 

Yours
 

 

Only  send this letter if you are absolutely prepared to go ahead with your threat to begin a claim on day 15. Don't Bluff

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...