Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Merligen/Moriarty Claimform - old Co-Op Util Dual fuel energy debt


aksl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I would be grateful for some assistance with a claim I have received made by Merligen Investments for a debt that they have acquired from Co-operative Energy.

 

I am aware of how to acknowledge the service. I would be grateful for some assistance with creating my CPR 31.14 for them. ** I have detailed what I have written so far at the bottom of this post **

 

I have supplied the info requested below:

 

Name of the Claimant ? Merligen Investments Limited

 

Date of issue –  11 MAR 2021

 

Date  to acknowledge) = 29.03.2021 

 

date to submit defence = 12.04.2021 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1.The defendant owes the claimant £4000 in respect of gas/electricity charges supplied to the defendant by Co-Operative Energy Limited (Debt)

 

2.Which debt was assigned to the claimant on 01/11/2019 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 01/11/2019.

 

3.Despite formal demand for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay and the claimant claims £4000

 

4.and further claims interest thereon pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £300

 

What is the total value of the claim? £4860.68
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? yes
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? no - energy bills
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? ?
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? unsure
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? unsure
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? no
 

Why did you cease payments? August 2017
 

What was the date of your last payment? August 2017
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? yes

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes
 

Request for documents mentioned in a statement of case under CPR 31.14

(template removed please read what it said in red at it's top - dx)

 

1.     Detailed breakdown of the gas/electricity charges

2.     The deed of assignment

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Merligen/Moriarty Claimform - old Co-Op energy debt

so why did the co-op sell the debt on and not crush you themselves?

it's very easy for any energy supplier to get a CCJ and send in HCEO bailiffs or simply just get a court order to force entry and fit pre Payment meters

 

whats the history of this debt please

and for now many years previous to 2017 does this +£4k bill run for

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why co-op sold the debt.

The debt arose from tariff changes and I quickly went from credit to arrears.

 

At the time I was having serious family issues and unfortunately a lot of other things were left and the issue went unnoticed. I spent a fortune on solicitors and court fees for child custody for my child and other bills were left unpaid, which worsened the problem.


I tried to make an agreement but was told I was unable to switch provider or to a cheaper tariff whilst in arrears. I made payments to cover usage and to start to reduce the arrears. I was then made redundant and the issue worsened still.

 

When I started work again I attempted to resolve the issue but Co-op were less than helpful and still refused to allow me to move to a better tariff. I made several complaints. I was made redundant for a second time and finally I was allowed to switch provider.


If memory serves me correctly the final amount owing to Co-op was far less than the amount claimed for now. I can’t remember for how long this bill runs for. 
 

Hope this helps. 

 

Hi dx,

 

Apologies, I’m not sure what you refer to, with regards to your comment:

 

(template removed please read what it said in red at it's top - dx)
 

The cpr 31.14 request I had posted was edited from one I sent regarding an old debt a few years ago. 
 

I would be grateful if you could give me some further info. 
 

Many thanks in advance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok all our templates state at the top do not publish in the open forum, which is why everything here is always PDF only, whereby nly registered users can access/see them.. 

we wouldn't want say a DCA spy seeing things now would we...:pound:

 

now in terms of the CPR and what to request.

you can't ask for the deed so that would never have been advised nor in our list of stuff you can ask for on the template

you must of added that yourself before. on our list will be the Notice of assignment which you can request.

you also need to ask for every bill be that gas or electric which makes any part of the sum claimed.

 

as the claim was issued this year, there is a 6yrs limit to how far they can go back, so if some of the sum is for billing from before mar 2015, the sum of those bills must be removed from the claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks dx. 
 

Sorry for posting the info for the enemy to see 🤣 Thanks for deleting. 
 

I think the cpr request I used was one from a template on an old site, something along the lines of ***** free. This was an old credit card debt from the same period that went to court a few years ago. The claim was thrown out by the judge based on the refusal to provide the deed of assignment, as I think my defence was around proof of ownership of debt and cited legal precedent from another case (I won’t name it in case any spies see it). Was hoping (maybe naively) this would give the same end result. 

 

Can you please advise how I should proceed. I would be grateful with help writing my cpr 31.14 and later my defence. 


Many thanks again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

as well as removing the existing 1-4 list,  remove the line before that mentions the CCA 1974.

 

insert.

 

the Notice of assignment which you can request.

you also need to ask for every bill be that gas or electric which makes any part of the sum claimed.

 

 

you do NOT await any return

you must file your defence by 4 pm 12/4.

 

plenty of

util claimform

threads here 

use our search in our top red banner 

 

the Notice of assignment which you can request.

you also need to ask for every bill be that gas or electric which makes any part of the sum claimed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Merligen/Moriarty Claimform - old Co-Op Util Dual fuel energy debt
  • 3 weeks later...

So, I sent my CPR 31.14 and requested the following:

 

1: the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2: Notice of Assignment

 

3: Every bill, in respect of gas/electricity charges supplied, which make up any part of the sum claimed

 

I have received a reply confirming their position is that the outstanding balance remains due. The reply includes:

 

1. a copy of a final bill dated 19 March 2018 for £4,255.26. This included a previous balance of £3,974.38 and new charges of £280.88 (for 11 December 2017 - 12 March 2018). This bill is based on estimated start readings and estimated end readings.

 

2. a copy of a letter from Coop Energy giving notice of assignment dated 02/12/2019. 

 

As in my earlier message, even though I was repeatedly told I was unable to switch tariff or provider, the bill states that if I was to switch to Coop's cheapest tariff I would save £240.26 a year on electricity and save £149.50 a year on gas.   

 

I would be grateful for assistance in compiling my defence. Please let me know what further information you need me to provide.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please scan up to ONE multipage PDF everything they have sent

read our upload guide carefully.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so zilch there to prove what the +£4k debt comprises of then...:pound:

 

when are DCA's going stop thinking a utils debt gives them superhuman powers....

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence due Monday 12th 4.00pm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

Wanted to submit my defence today. I’ve had a look but I’m struggling to find any templates in the threads. Could someone please point me in the right direction or help me out with what to put for my defence. 
 

Many thanks in advance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use our search in our top red banner.

util claimform

post it up here 1st please for checking.

 

Programmable Search Engine (google.com)  <<clickme

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had another good look around but still struggled to find any templates. I did find a defence on a thread that I have adapted below. I would greatly appreciate some input before I file it. Again, many thanks in advance.

 

Defence

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with Co-operative Energy in the past. During the period, Co-operative Energy actively blocked me from hanging to a cheaper tariff or switching provider as there was an outstanding balance on the account.

 

3. Throughout this period Co-operative Energy served estimated bills. This is shown in the one copy of a bill that the claimant has been able to provide. The claimant has given no details as to the full breakdown of their claim and what dates it relates to, so I am unable to defend specifically until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

5. The claimant does not have access to the agreement nor was the Assignor required to retain a copy. Therefore their claim is unsubstantiated.

 

Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

 

1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement,  the original(s) should be available at the hearing along with a complete breakdown of how the charges accrued by date and amount.

 

With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -

 

a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.

b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good i can see where you got that from 

pers i'd put back, suitable adapted the line:

 

3.Throughout this period XXX only ever served estimated bills which were grossly over estimated with values unrelated to actual use. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with XXX which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks dx.

 

I have amended and my updated version is below.

 

Defence

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with Co-operative Energy in the past. During the period, Co-operative Energy actively blocked me from changing to a cheaper tariff or switching provider as there was an outstanding balance on the account.

 

3.Throughout this period Co-operative Energy only ever served estimated bills which were grossly over estimated with values unrelated to actual use. This is shown in the one copy of a bill (the final bill) that the claimant has been able to provide. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with Co-operative Energy which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the full breakdown of their claim and what dates it relates to, so I am unable to defend specifically until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

5. The claimant does not have access to the agreement nor was the Assignor required to retain a copy. Therefore their claim is unsubstantiated.

 

Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

 

1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement,  the original(s) should be available at the hearing along with a complete breakdown of how the charges accrued by date and amount.

 

With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -

 

a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.

b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe thats ok

let @Andyorchcheck it over mind

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine go a head and file.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So, on the 1st May (Saturday) I received a 'Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track'.

 

It states:

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT

 

1.  This is now a defended claim.

      The defendant has filed a defence, a copy of which is enclosed.

 

2. It appears that this case is suitable for allocation to the small claims track.

     If you believe that this track is not the appropriate track for the claim, you must complete box C1 on the Small Claims Directions Questionnaire           (Form N180) and explain why.

 

3. You must by 10 May 2021 complete the Small Claims Directions Questionnaire (Form N180) and file it with the court office and serve copies on all other parties.

 

Unfortunately, as I have been working away, this is the first opportunity I have had to deal with it.

 

I would be grateful for some assistance with my N180.

 

1. Can I file my N180 online?

2. Are the responses fairly standard for most cases or will they vary depending on the circumstances.

    For example what should be my response for 

    A1 Do you agree to this case being referred to the Small Claims Mediation Service?

3. If they are standard can I follow the below that I found on another thread:

       

Yes to mediation No if its statute barred or a parking claim.

Yes to Small Claims Track

State your local County Court 

1 witness = yourself

 

   Or if they are not standard, could anyone please advise on how to respond.

 

4. I saw another thread but was slightly confused as it seemed a little ambiguous.

     Am I correct in thinking that I give contact information on the court copy and sign it but do not give any contact info or sign the copy to the             claimant's solicitors? Could some one please clarify?

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 copies

1 wit you 

the rest is obv.

 

1 to the court

1 to moriarty (minus phone/sig/email)

1 for you file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to the points you raise yes you can email the N180 but you cant submit it on line direct. It must be sent by 4.00pm on the date stated within your Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track.

 

Email for MCOL Directions Questionnaire

[email protected]

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

wonder what happened?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...