Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you everyone!  thought to share some points from my experience in court today that may help others who are taking Evri to court: The judge sets out how the hearing will go and how each party should behave; while i was certainly feeling anxious/nervous ahead of the hearing (and I'm sure @jk2054 may have also observed this), the judge really does try to put any non-legal persons at ease; refrain from talking to the other party and instead speak to the judge if you have any questions/responses; the judge and the advocate spoke about tort of negligence - i wasn't sure how this applied to my case but the judge was questionning the advocate about this so i chose to stay out of this; the judge made reference to a historical case of Donaghue v Stevenson which established a duty of care; the judge observed that some of the points in Evri's witness statement by george wood needed cross examination but george was not present today for questionning; While i was claiming 8% interest, the judge pointed out that is the upper limit and that today, savings accounts give 4-5%. I therefore opted for 5% interest which was agreed to by the judge and the advocate; above all else, ensure you know your court bundle and have any notes to help you refer to specific sections - it helped me to structure my answers to the judge/defendant's queries, and point to specific evidence where i was asked to prove e.g., the value of the item. @honeybee13 - yes, will confirm when payment is received. I have emailed the Evri.claims email with my bank details and also provided them after the hearing to the advocate. @BankFodder message received and i am replying to it
    • Looks promising then.  Well done   Dx
    • So a little update.  I sent a complaint to ico and have heard nothing. I just got the general reply email and that's it.  Sat twiddling my thumbs and thought about what I should do next. I searched for the CEO of Studio but then found that he'd left so as keep getting letters from studio about the arrears etc. I thought I'd email the David Twigg. Sent him all the bumpft and a copy of my original complaint and sars request.  Got no response. So didn't know what else to do. Then I thought I'd try through the financial difficulties option on the online form. One last try before I just give up and let them default me.  Then on the 5th June. I got an email from their customer services. That the items that had gone AWOL have all been cancelled. Nothing else on that email, so I had a look in an email account that I don't use anymore and there was an email from the customer service.  That they were sorry for the problems I've had for the last 9 months. That the sars info was emailed to me on 14/04, it wasn't I've kept all spam and deleted emails on that account, they have raised a complaint with their studio pay team regarding the issues, balance dispute, fee's and my credit file. They are hoping to resolve in 3 days but they have upto 56. They also said in regards to my other issues I have to raise a complaint with studio retail but haven't told me how I do that.  The sars info only goes upto the end of December 2023. It has my previous complaints on there but nothing after so I don't know how I get hold of that information. Luckily I've kept copies of every time I've contacted them. Every web chat or social media contact.  Apologies for the extremely long post but I wanted to add everything I could just incase.  I have checked my account balance and it's still minus 900 odd pounds but I'll keep checking to see if it's all cleared and on my credit file.  I'm hoping this is the end of the whole debacle and they close my account because I never want to do this again. Although it's been a learning experience.  Thanks to dx100uk for pointing me in the right direction. Much appreciated.   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • If you want to cause DCBL trouble, then complain to the SRA.  It would be even more fun if mystic_bertie would complain at the same time, to show the SRA there is a pattern.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Merligen/Moriarty Claimform - old Co-Op Util Dual fuel energy debt


aksl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 430 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I would be grateful for some assistance with a claim I have received made by Merligen Investments for a debt that they have acquired from Co-operative Energy.

 

I am aware of how to acknowledge the service. I would be grateful for some assistance with creating my CPR 31.14 for them. ** I have detailed what I have written so far at the bottom of this post **

 

I have supplied the info requested below:

 

Name of the Claimant ? Merligen Investments Limited

 

Date of issue –  11 MAR 2021

 

Date  to acknowledge) = 29.03.2021 

 

date to submit defence = 12.04.2021 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – 

 

1.The defendant owes the claimant £4000 in respect of gas/electricity charges supplied to the defendant by Co-Operative Energy Limited (Debt)

 

2.Which debt was assigned to the claimant on 01/11/2019 and notice of which was given to the defendant on the 01/11/2019.

 

3.Despite formal demand for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay and the claimant claims £4000

 

4.and further claims interest thereon pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £300

 

What is the total value of the claim? £4860.68
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? yes
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? no - energy bills
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? ?
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? unsure
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? unsure
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? no
 

Why did you cease payments? August 2017
 

What was the date of your last payment? August 2017
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? yes

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes
 

Request for documents mentioned in a statement of case under CPR 31.14

(template removed please read what it said in red at it's top - dx)

 

1.     Detailed breakdown of the gas/electricity charges

2.     The deed of assignment

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Merligen/Moriarty Claimform - old Co-Op energy debt

so why did the co-op sell the debt on and not crush you themselves?

it's very easy for any energy supplier to get a CCJ and send in HCEO bailiffs or simply just get a court order to force entry and fit pre Payment meters

 

whats the history of this debt please

and for now many years previous to 2017 does this +£4k bill run for

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why co-op sold the debt.

The debt arose from tariff changes and I quickly went from credit to arrears.

 

At the time I was having serious family issues and unfortunately a lot of other things were left and the issue went unnoticed. I spent a fortune on solicitors and court fees for child custody for my child and other bills were left unpaid, which worsened the problem.


I tried to make an agreement but was told I was unable to switch provider or to a cheaper tariff whilst in arrears. I made payments to cover usage and to start to reduce the arrears. I was then made redundant and the issue worsened still.

 

When I started work again I attempted to resolve the issue but Co-op were less than helpful and still refused to allow me to move to a better tariff. I made several complaints. I was made redundant for a second time and finally I was allowed to switch provider.


If memory serves me correctly the final amount owing to Co-op was far less than the amount claimed for now. I can’t remember for how long this bill runs for. 
 

Hope this helps. 

 

Hi dx,

 

Apologies, I’m not sure what you refer to, with regards to your comment:

 

(template removed please read what it said in red at it's top - dx)
 

The cpr 31.14 request I had posted was edited from one I sent regarding an old debt a few years ago. 
 

I would be grateful if you could give me some further info. 
 

Many thanks in advance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok all our templates state at the top do not publish in the open forum, which is why everything here is always PDF only, whereby nly registered users can access/see them.. 

we wouldn't want say a DCA spy seeing things now would we...:pound:

 

now in terms of the CPR and what to request.

you can't ask for the deed so that would never have been advised nor in our list of stuff you can ask for on the template

you must of added that yourself before. on our list will be the Notice of assignment which you can request.

you also need to ask for every bill be that gas or electric which makes any part of the sum claimed.

 

as the claim was issued this year, there is a 6yrs limit to how far they can go back, so if some of the sum is for billing from before mar 2015, the sum of those bills must be removed from the claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks dx. 
 

Sorry for posting the info for the enemy to see 🤣 Thanks for deleting. 
 

I think the cpr request I used was one from a template on an old site, something along the lines of ***** free. This was an old credit card debt from the same period that went to court a few years ago. The claim was thrown out by the judge based on the refusal to provide the deed of assignment, as I think my defence was around proof of ownership of debt and cited legal precedent from another case (I won’t name it in case any spies see it). Was hoping (maybe naively) this would give the same end result. 

 

Can you please advise how I should proceed. I would be grateful with help writing my cpr 31.14 and later my defence. 


Many thanks again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

as well as removing the existing 1-4 list,  remove the line before that mentions the CCA 1974.

 

insert.

 

the Notice of assignment which you can request.

you also need to ask for every bill be that gas or electric which makes any part of the sum claimed.

 

 

you do NOT await any return

you must file your defence by 4 pm 12/4.

 

plenty of

util claimform

threads here 

use our search in our top red banner 

 

the Notice of assignment which you can request.

you also need to ask for every bill be that gas or electric which makes any part of the sum claimed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Merligen/Moriarty Claimform - old Co-Op Util Dual fuel energy debt
  • 3 weeks later...

So, I sent my CPR 31.14 and requested the following:

 

1: the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2: Notice of Assignment

 

3: Every bill, in respect of gas/electricity charges supplied, which make up any part of the sum claimed

 

I have received a reply confirming their position is that the outstanding balance remains due. The reply includes:

 

1. a copy of a final bill dated 19 March 2018 for £4,255.26. This included a previous balance of £3,974.38 and new charges of £280.88 (for 11 December 2017 - 12 March 2018). This bill is based on estimated start readings and estimated end readings.

 

2. a copy of a letter from Coop Energy giving notice of assignment dated 02/12/2019. 

 

As in my earlier message, even though I was repeatedly told I was unable to switch tariff or provider, the bill states that if I was to switch to Coop's cheapest tariff I would save £240.26 a year on electricity and save £149.50 a year on gas.   

 

I would be grateful for assistance in compiling my defence. Please let me know what further information you need me to provide.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please scan up to ONE multipage PDF everything they have sent

read our upload guide carefully.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so zilch there to prove what the +£4k debt comprises of then...:pound:

 

when are DCA's going stop thinking a utils debt gives them superhuman powers....

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence due Monday 12th 4.00pm

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

Wanted to submit my defence today. I’ve had a look but I’m struggling to find any templates in the threads. Could someone please point me in the right direction or help me out with what to put for my defence. 
 

Many thanks in advance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use our search in our top red banner.

util claimform

post it up here 1st please for checking.

 

Programmable Search Engine (google.com)  <<clickme

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had another good look around but still struggled to find any templates. I did find a defence on a thread that I have adapted below. I would greatly appreciate some input before I file it. Again, many thanks in advance.

 

Defence

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with Co-operative Energy in the past. During the period, Co-operative Energy actively blocked me from hanging to a cheaper tariff or switching provider as there was an outstanding balance on the account.

 

3. Throughout this period Co-operative Energy served estimated bills. This is shown in the one copy of a bill that the claimant has been able to provide. The claimant has given no details as to the full breakdown of their claim and what dates it relates to, so I am unable to defend specifically until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

5. The claimant does not have access to the agreement nor was the Assignor required to retain a copy. Therefore their claim is unsubstantiated.

 

Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

 

1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement,  the original(s) should be available at the hearing along with a complete breakdown of how the charges accrued by date and amount.

 

With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -

 

a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.

b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good i can see where you got that from 

pers i'd put back, suitable adapted the line:

 

3.Throughout this period XXX only ever served estimated bills which were grossly over estimated with values unrelated to actual use. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with XXX which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks dx.

 

I have amended and my updated version is below.

 

Defence

 

1. I the Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. It is admitted that I have had a supply and service agreement with Co-operative Energy in the past. During the period, Co-operative Energy actively blocked me from changing to a cheaper tariff or switching provider as there was an outstanding balance on the account.

 

3.Throughout this period Co-operative Energy only ever served estimated bills which were grossly over estimated with values unrelated to actual use. This is shown in the one copy of a bill (the final bill) that the claimant has been able to provide. There was and still remains an unresolved dispute with Co-operative Energy which was never resolved prior to the assignment of the alleged debt. Furthermore, the claimant has given no details as to the full breakdown of their claim and what dates it relates to, so I am unable to defend specifically until the claimant can particularise and quantify its pleadings.

 

4. Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges are now over 12 months old and relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging.

 

5. The claimant does not have access to the agreement nor was the Assignor required to retain a copy. Therefore their claim is unsubstantiated.

 

Pursuant to the civil procedure rules Practice Direction 16 (7.3) Where a claim is based upon a written agreement.

 

1) a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement,  the original(s) should be available at the hearing along with a complete breakdown of how the charges accrued by date and amount.

 

With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: -

 

a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement.

b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed.

c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe thats ok

let @Andyorchcheck it over mind

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine go a head and file.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So, on the 1st May (Saturday) I received a 'Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track'.

 

It states:

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT

 

1.  This is now a defended claim.

      The defendant has filed a defence, a copy of which is enclosed.

 

2. It appears that this case is suitable for allocation to the small claims track.

     If you believe that this track is not the appropriate track for the claim, you must complete box C1 on the Small Claims Directions Questionnaire           (Form N180) and explain why.

 

3. You must by 10 May 2021 complete the Small Claims Directions Questionnaire (Form N180) and file it with the court office and serve copies on all other parties.

 

Unfortunately, as I have been working away, this is the first opportunity I have had to deal with it.

 

I would be grateful for some assistance with my N180.

 

1. Can I file my N180 online?

2. Are the responses fairly standard for most cases or will they vary depending on the circumstances.

    For example what should be my response for 

    A1 Do you agree to this case being referred to the Small Claims Mediation Service?

3. If they are standard can I follow the below that I found on another thread:

       

Yes to mediation No if its statute barred or a parking claim.

Yes to Small Claims Track

State your local County Court 

1 witness = yourself

 

   Or if they are not standard, could anyone please advise on how to respond.

 

4. I saw another thread but was slightly confused as it seemed a little ambiguous.

     Am I correct in thinking that I give contact information on the court copy and sign it but do not give any contact info or sign the copy to the             claimant's solicitors? Could some one please clarify?

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 copies

1 wit you 

the rest is obv.

 

1 to the court

1 to moriarty (minus phone/sig/email)

1 for you file

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to the points you raise yes you can email the N180 but you cant submit it on line direct. It must be sent by 4.00pm on the date stated within your Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track.

 

Email for MCOL Directions Questionnaire

[email protected]

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

wonder what happened?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...