Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Same as Barclays one I have just updated on. PRA group have written back and told me they intend to proceed with claim, have also sent another stack of documents, similar to last time round. I did fill in an online income breakdown etc on their website  offering to pay them x amount of money back each month,  a couple of weeks back, they haven't acknowledged that ?  
    • Hello, I wasn't able to update the defence, so they got the daft one.  Pra Group have responded dated 25th April saying they intend to proceed with claim. I have also received a stack of documents, similar to last time - print outs of old statements, but this time around they have send me a copy of the Barclay Card Conditions. Unsigned and dated. The address is an old address.  A consumer credit agreement with current address. Pages of it and no signature. I have uploaded onto a PDF what I have. The CCA agreement looks like a generic print out, I5 pages + long, I've included the 1st page that had my details on (redacted) don't know if its necessary to upload all of it.  Barclays 26042024.pdf
    • I suggested consideration of bankruptcy some years ago. It was not well received.
    • That is a superb WS. However, I have a few tweaks to suggest. In (2) "indicating" not "indication". I think to be consistent with your numbering, in (6) the Beavis case should be EXHIBIT 2. Do you really need to include over 100 pages of Beavis?  I think that would be likely to annoy the judge.  Just try and find the bit where they decide it was not a penalty due to having an interest in limiting the time that vehicles can stay. I'll have a look myself for this bit later as it's highly likely to be in WSs from PPCs who think that that paragraph means all their charges are valid always on every occasion. After your current (7) add this.  It's always useful to refer to a judgment when making a legal point - 8.  In the case PCM vs Bull, Claim No. B4GF26K6, where the Defendant was issued parking tickets for parking on private roads with signage stating “No parking at any time”, District Judge Glen in his final statement mentioned that: “the notice was prohibitive and didn’t communicate any offer of parking and that landowners may have claim in trespass, but that was not under consideration”.   In (14) if my maths are right the CPR request should be "EXHIBIT 3".  it is missing from your list of exhibits. In (16) the two figures should be £100 and £170.  They are entitled to increase fro,m £60 to £100, they are not entitled to increase to £170.  To make it clear for the judge I would write - 16. The Claimant has artificially inflated their claim for a £100 invoice to £170. This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims. 17. The Claimant has also invented a second fictitious charge, for legal representative's costs, when they have no legal representative. You also need ot number your exhibits. The rest is excellent - well done.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am doing my moneyclaim on line and I am now stuck!

 

Can someone tell me if this is correct?

 

The Claimant has an account xxxx with

the Defendant, opened 1992. 2. Since

31/3/01 the Defendant debited charges and

interest in respect of purported breaches

of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all

details as a list of charges has already

been supplied. Another copy will be sent.

4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges

exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the

breaches; (b) The Term permitting the

Defendant to levy such charges is

unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in

Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair

Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law.

5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the

amounts debited of £5,966; (b) Interest per

S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% -

£6,637.74 continuing at 8% until judgment

or settlement at a daily rate of £1.47;

The claimant claims interest under section

69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the

rate of 8% a year from 31/3/01 to 4/12/06

of £ 6,637.74 and also interest at the same

rate up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of £1.47

 

This is what is holding me up now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi m8, am I right in thinking u are claiming £5966 plus £6637 in interest? that seems to be a huge claim and Im amazed the interest is more than the actual charges.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may need to ammend your claim, coz I think it comes accross as the way I said. unless I have filed my claim wrong.

 

Do u know what I mean?

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

It looks wrong to me, Have you added the charges & the interest together?

your interest looks way over the top to what the charges are

 

from looking at what you have wrote for your mcol, I think you have put the charges & interest in the interest place, I hope you know what I mean. If not have a look at this:

 

The Claimant has an account xxxxxxx with

the Defendant, opened 1992. 2. Since

31/3/01 the Defendant debited charges and

interest in respect of purported breaches

of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all

details as a list of charges has already

been supplied. Another copy will be sent.

4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges

exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the

breaches; (b) The Term permitting the

Defendant to levy such charges is

unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in

Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair

Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law.

5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the

amounts debited of £5,966; (b) Interest per

S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% -

£?????? continuing at 8% until judgment

or settlement at a daily rate of £1.47;

The claimant claims interest under section

69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the

rate of 8% a year from 31/3/01 to 4/12/06

of £ 6,637.74 and also interest at the same

rate up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of £1.47

 

see where the ?????? this is where your interest goes & only the interest

hope this is helping you out, if I am wrong I know someone will jump in & tell you, but it doesnt look right to me.

Good Luck with Your Claim

 

Angi x

 

 

:) If I have been of any help, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the botton left corner. ;) Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah thats what I thought Angi, I was gettin worried tho coz I filed my MCOL last week and I did mine the way you said. I even pm'd a mod.

 

Teziper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

ohh its easy done, I know I did the same when I did my claim lol

 

I think this bit is the one that needs to be done with more care than any other part of the claim, coz this is the final bit that has to be spot on, we dont what to see any little mistakes now, But hey thats what the great people on this site are here for, to give a helping hand.

Good Luck with Your Claim

 

Angi x

 

 

:) If I have been of any help, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the botton left corner. ;) Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I think I get you!

 

I have ammended the changes, is this right now?

 

The Claimant has an account xxxxxxx with

the Defendant,opened 1992.2,Since

31/3/01 the Defendant debited charges and

interest in respect of purported breaches

of contract.3.Defendant is aware of all

details as a list of charges has already

been supplied. 4.claimant contends:(a)The

charges exceed the Defendant's losses

caused by the breaches;(b)The Term

permitting the defendant to levy such

charges is unenforceable under the Unfair

Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations

1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at

Common Law. 5. Claimant claims:(a)return of

the amounts debited of £5,966;(b)Interest

per S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% -

£671.74 continuing at 8% until judgment

or settlement at a daily rate of £1.47;

and also interest at the same

rate up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of £1.47

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the process of completing my MCOL too and compared it with what Shaun has written.

I have added:

 

6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the Court

 

instead of what Shaun has added:

 

and also interest at the same

rate up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of £1.47

 

Does it matter? I am losing it with all this legal jargon!!!

 

Please help

 

 

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its any help...heres the particulars of my claim on MCOL

 

1. The Claimant has an account …………..with the Defendant, opened July 2001.2. Since September 2002 the Defendant debited charges and interest in respect of purported breaches of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy will be sent. 4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches; (b) The Term permitting the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law. 5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the amounts debited of £1106.10; (b) Interest per S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - £179.88 continuing at 8% until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.22; 6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the Court.

 

 

The £1106.10 is the totat amount of charges including interest accrued from the charges, the £179.88 is the interest at 8% from when the charges were levied..

 

HOPE THIS HELPS AND DOESNT CONFUSE

 

 

Oh Yes! £1106.10 + £179.88 + sar fee + court costs = total claim:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one cheers for that, I wasnt that far off....ahem!!

 

It's going to cost me £250 to file my claim just before christmas too! (if my girlf hadnt dumped me then i wouldn't have been able to afford to pay it.... so thanks to her i can!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help please: I am about to enter a claim on line. I am claiming £3195 from 29 December 1999 to 4 August 2006. I have never done a spreadsheet before and the one in the template library would not load (I am not sure if it is because I use a Mac). Anyway I still not sure how to calculate the interest for this amount of this period. Any tips would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Helen,

 

Yeah filed it yesterday and got a letter from the courts which i thought was quick!

 

They are going to file it on the Halifax on Monday apparantly so watch this space, they have until Dec26th to file a defence.

 

Hope they do need the money!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will probably get a couple of days extention on this date as it falls on Boxing Day, expect them to get it in 28th/29th.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let u know, I filed on the 29th and was paid 2day the full amount. £3385. It took 9 days.

Just to hurry things along I emailed the halifax legal department. I told them I wanted to know where to send my updated list of charges but I was really just trying to alert them to the fact that I had served them court papers.

I think it helped.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

If bank hasnt acknowledged yet then email this person just informing them that you have filed a cliam against the halifax and provide the claim number, then ask them where to send the updated list of charges. Thats what I did and I got quite a speddy settlement.

 

Ms. Rachel Hinchliffe

HBOS PLC

Legal Services - Retail Division

Trinity Road

Halifax

West Yorkshire

HX1 2RG

01422 391096

Fax: 01422 333453

Email: rachelhinchliffe@HBOSplc. com

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...