Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • where? reflection of a sign on the bonnet but no PCN yellow env... W3 SAR documents v2.pdf
    • They didn't turn up because they knew they would lose so they saved the cost of sending a brief saving them a couple of hundred pounds at least. But still a big relief for you now that it's all over . So congratulations plus you can enjoy your trip that much more. 
    • I will try again...................... Even at my age there is quite clearly a PCN envelope by the windscreen wipers on your car on some of the photos.  But as I said in the IPC letter, that is not the dispute. The dispute is that CPM sent you the second PCN on the 28 th day of the issue date of the first PCN. It should not have been sent until the day AFTER the original PCN was issued. Therefore they broke the Act, they breached the IPC Code of Conduct and their agreement with the DVLA. It is something that the IPC cannot ignore since to do so will bring the ICO down on them and the DVLA should ban CPM from getting data from them once they know if the ICO do nothing. The minimum I expect is that your PCN will be cancelled. But it is up to you. I have given you the details, you have copies of both PCNs sent to you on the sar  with all  the relevant dates. 
    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer claimform - old 2003 Lloyds Loan -stayed - Now n244 to lift stay-Summary Judgment


sxam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello DX, 

Now what should be my counter to all these as I need to submit all these late by Monday 

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just type no need to hit quote.

 

nothing you need to counter...

but you must get the timeline clear and ensure you are explaining and questioning all you need to too strengthen your case.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At a glance it looks fine...is there anything in particular you are not sure about..?  Your statement of truth is now out of date you need to update this with the new CPR version.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in agreement with a paragraph and it renders nothing detrimental to your case I normally just respond with paragraph x is noted. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Can I write this on the conclusion part? They did provide which looks looks a valid CCA but they do not have original default notice. I am confused weather to mention section 77, 87 and 89 or just the faulty default notice part.

 

"Conclusion

 

In view of the information set out above I respectfully submit to the court that the claimant’s application be denied. The claim remains stayed until such time the claimant can comply with section 77 of the CCA1974 and section 87 and 88 of the CCA 1974 or in the absence of that compliance strike out the claimant claim and dismiss the claim in its entirety."

 

Hopefully the final one, Thanks.

Claim No. xxxx

BETWEEN: xxxx

 

AND

 

 Defendant xxxx

 _________________________________________

 WITNESS STATEMENT OF xxxx

 _________________________________________

 

 I xxxxx, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows;

 

1.       I make this Witness Statement to oppose the claimant application dated 02 February 2022 to lift the stay and Strike Out Defence/Summary Judgment pursuant to CPR 24.5 (1) a&b in view of my defence submitted to the claim dated 27 January 2021

 

2.       The claimants witness statement opening paragraph confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding that they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act and also be in attendance at hearing to give evidence in support of the claimants witness statement.

 

3.       It is my understanding that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed 10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. They then issue claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.

 

4.       As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.

 

 

Background

 

5.       It is admitted that I have had financial dealings with Lloyds Banking Group in the past but on receipt of this claim I was unsure of the agreement and any alleged balance or ever been contacted by Lloyds Banking in connection with any outstanding debt.

 

6.       The claimants issued this claim through MCOL Northampton on 29 January 2021 to which I submitted my defence and the claim has remained stayed. The claimants made application dated 12 May 2022.

 

7.       On receipt of this claim I could not recall the precise details of the agreement or any debt and sought clarity from the claimant. I was unaware of any notice of assignment, nor had I been issued with a default notice, pursuant to section 87 (1) CCA 1974.

 

8.       On 8 February 2021, I made a CPR 31.14 formal written request to the claimant and the claimant’s solicitor.

 

Defendants Response to claimants claim/ Application

 

9.        Paragraph 5. The claimant claims that the agreement was entered into on the 13 May 2003. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a section 78 request dated 08/02/2021 a copy of the agreement and Terms and Conditions and statement. The claimant never responded, and the claim was stayed. See Exhibit xxx

 

10.   Paragraph 6 of the claimant’s statement confirms that they do not hold a copy of the Default Notice and wish to rely on a screen shot confirming the date it was allegedly issued. It is therefore contended that the original creditor failed to serve a valid Default Notice pursuant to section 87 (1). Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement.

 

Sec 87 Need of default notice

 

1.       Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice”)       is  necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement:

a)      To terminate the agreement, or

b)      To demand earlier payment of any sum, or

c)       To recover possession of any goods or land or

d)      To treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred or

e)      To enforce any security

 

Sec 88 Contents and effect of default notice

1.       The default notice must be in the prescribed form and specify

a)      The nature of the alleged breach

b)      If the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date before which that action is to be taken

c)       If the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach, and the date before which it is to be paid

 

 

11.   Paragraphs 7 confirms that payment received to the account however the statement of account is not original and creditors been recreated. The sum does not match the money paid to Apex. Please see Exibhit xxx.

Last payment to Apex was on xxxx and no further payment has been made since. See Exhibit xxx. On 27/09/2017, I made CPR 31.14 formal written request to Apex and Lloyds (See Exhibit xxx) to provide true copy of the credit agreement relating to the account. Both apex and Lloyds failed to comply with my lawful request hence the account was in default. 22 months later, account was subsequently sold to Cabot on 29 July 2019

 

12.   Paragraph 8 claims that absolute all amount due to Lloyds Banking Group was sold to Cabot on 29 July 2019, however the total debt purchased does not match the outstanding debt with Apex at the time account was put on hold following my CCA request. See Exhibit xx

13.   Paragraph 9 is noted but not accepted. It is denied that I was ever served a Notice of Assignment pursuant to sec136 of the LoP and will contend that the exhibit marked 15 & 16  is a mocked up template.

 

14.    Paragraph 10 is denied. I was not aware of any assignment nor ever requested to make payments by Cabot. This account was handled by Apex Credit Management and was in default since they failed to comply with my lawful CCA request. Claimant exhibit xxx Notice of assignment is a new template with the details added

 

15.   Paragraph 12 simply confirms my Defence which puts the claimant to strict proof. I will contend that it is disappointing that the claimant can only disclose templates and cut and pastes and screen shots that have no legal valid connection to any agreement.

 

16.   Paragraph 13 is noted but irrelevant if a valid copy of default notice cannot be disclosed on which the claimant claim relies upon.

 

17.   Paragraphs 16 is denied, I am not aware of any letters pre litigation from the claimant and again I would suggest that they are a form of template with dates added to pad out the claimants bundle.

 

Conclusion

 

In view of the information set out above I respectfully submit to the court that the claimant’s application be denied. The claim remains stayed until such time the claimant can comply with 87 and 88 of the CCA 1974 or in the absence of that compliance strike out the claimant claim and dismiss the claim in its entirety.

 

Statement of truth

 

I, XXXXXXX defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

 

Signed: ...................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we got a copy of the CCA here on your topic ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes I see responded at the time you posted...unfortunately its a good one...so yes I would refrain in your conclusion with regards the CCA and replace with the DN and sections 87/88

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I thought hence removed the 77 part. Good to go Andy?

Is this all I need along with Exhibits to go to Court and copy to Claimant Solicitor?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conclusion

 

In view of the information set out above I respectfully submit to the court that the claimant’s application be denied. The claim remains stayed until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a copy of the Default Notice pursuant to sec 87 and sec 88 of the CCA 1974 that service or in the absence of that compliance strike out the claimant claim and dismiss the claim in its entirety.

 

Just a few tweaks yes attach your exhibit's numbered then file with the court and serve on the Solicitor..retain a copy for your file.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just mark it on the statement after the paragraph (see exhibit xx)  and mark the same number on the exhibit 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if you mean exhibit number

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you intend to reply...standard procedure to serve notice of costs pre hearing .

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Costs are normally determined at the conclusion of a claim but because this is an application for Summary Judgment its standard for the claimant submit its costs incurred by the application. But you will see they have included their total costs of which £410 issuance and £ 100 Sols fee are already on the claim form so if they get judgment that will auto be included in the judgment make sure that's not duplicated.

 

Its your choice if you wish to submit costs in defending the application and claim

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also if their application is dismissed...then so are the costs incurred for the Summary Judgment hearing.

  • I agree 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type in the reply box there is no need to hit quote each time.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Till today I haven’t got any response from either court or claimant, so definitely I think we are going for hearing. Is there any particular things that I need to say in front of the Judge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refer to your witness statement and if needs be draft a short skeleton argument for your use to refer to any bullitt points.

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...