Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
    • Oh dear.. Misuse of facility...  Cat 6... No wonder everything is being nuked from high orbit... More in a bit.. 
    • Thank you fkofilee First question: what do I do if Monzo close my account? I need an account but no one will touch me with this marker against me. Is there anywhere/any other option that I have if Monzo close my account? MCB is My Community Bank?  Yes What Category of Marker do you have? This is what it says on the Cifas SAR: Application date: 07 December 2023 Date recorded: 09 April 2024 Expiry date: 09 April 2030 Cifas Case Identifier: 15435315 Product relating to the application, proposal, account or facility: Personal Loan – Unsecured Facility: Granted Case type: Misuse of facility Reason(s) for filing: Evasion of payment Financial Loss Value of Loss: £5000.00 When did you raise the complaint? Last night via email Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan? I can prove that I had to buy a new washing machine, I have my pay slips showing the emergency tax code and a letter from the tax office after I had spoken with them to get it corrected and of course I can get a copy of my vet bill. And all of this was in the first 2-3 months of 2024.  I panicked. Stupid I know and as you say, I have learned the hard way and I am not in any way denying anything that I have done wrong, but it just feels a bit unfair.  It is what it is I guess and if I have to have it on me forever then so be it. I am just so worried about the bank situation 😕    
    • If it is MCB    National Fraud Database Members | Preventing Fraud Losses | Cifas WWW.CIFAS.ORG.UK A range of organisations use the National Fraud Database to share data on confirmed fraud cases, preventing over £1 billion in fraud losses every year.   They are on the register  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LTSB - Abbreviations on DPA / Customer Notes


Loula
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have requested from LTSB clarification on what their abbreviations means on the Customer Notes they are returning.

 

MO STDLET

 

BI CS_CHQ RES

 

BI ICA NEW

 

MI FO OTH

 

TI CHQACC OTH

 

ER CHQACC OTH

 

I can guess what mostof these mean, but I think we should know what the bank 'means'.

 

If you have any others you are interested in knowing please let me know and I will ask for those too.

 

LOULA

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are obliged to tell you under the DPA.

tell them to get a hurry on about it or you will consider it a violation and take appropriate action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loula just got ours back as well!!!!!

How about LS902 LM902 LM901 AK208 OF203 XP901 UB901 LH901 LH923 EM901 EM902 EM925 EM909 Not forgeting AG242 second class central 3299681 Bullivant,Janet 30943900

Frankly theyve done a good job of perplexing me!!

You to by the sound of it.

 

Going to try and tie up dates and names.

 

Another point is,When a name appears its obviously a "manual intervention" but as its "data"we asked for it,s "data"we got back?So I can only think of trying to tie a charge date with a name date if you know what i mean!Course you do youve got the same confusing bunch of papers....

good luck Loula...

john r

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok!

 

Will add them to the list!

 

Have reminded by email today, if no repsonse by monday will phone the lucky lady and have her spend an hour telling a 'very dense me' what it all means!

 

LOULA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nooooo,its not aa very dense"me" its just ordinary you.josephine public.Wanting to know what it all means and being a little p..d off with them and annoyed with yourself for trusting them for all these years when all thats happening is that they where making big profits from us when we were struggling.... still are.

 

 

 

Nationwide down.Capitulated just before summons served.

Lloyds Credit card "gesture of goodwill"

Lloyds bank We,l see.

john r

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just decided after reading threads that i,m going to claim back to 2cd February 2000 as that is the earliest statement they sent me havn,t got a clue why they didn,t just start with march or april.(Still can,t understand half the stuff they sent).

The fact they hold records as far back as that then i would surmise that THEY think its relevant?

£7o.00 worth of charges that month alone.they really hammered my wife that month.(as a non user of the joint acc at that time how was i to know)?

 

oh um hope your D.P.A.is easier to understand Loula!!!!

john r

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone had any joy at finding out what these codes stand for ?? if so pm me with details please. CCD Control pops up a lot.

If you find this info useful please click on the scales in the bottom left corner of the thread :wink:

 

Vodafone To Remove Default Notices thread

Paid In Full HSBC Was Claiming £3851.42 But Instead of Paying Me Decided to pay my £4900 Loan OffDG Solictors. Need Help

Concluded Lloyds TSB 27/05/2006 Action Against LloydsTSB

Concluded Lloyds TSB for Girlfriend. 27/05/2006

Paid In Full Capital One £160 Settled

Paid In Full Capital One Sent 15/05/06 for £1372 for Girlfriend

Paid In Full Cetelem £130 Settled

Paid In Full The AA £400 Settled

Paid In Full First National £160 Settled

PDA LloydsTsb Credit Card Hand Delivered 26/04/06 £180

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the customer notes, although it states employees names, it doesnt state that it was anything to do with the charges, just shows manuel intervention, eg: I have some from the loan centre.

 

So how do you know what is manuel intervention on this list relating to charges?

Does The date on the customer notes have to corresponde with the date on the charge sheet or statements to show money movement?

 

hhhhmmmm:???:

BL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aa ha

good good, some times i get worried im losing the plot. :-)

 

I have a strong suspition that the customer notes have nothing to with the manuel intervention and any highlighted manuel intervention would need to be indictaed as so. As we have all requested.

 

But

 

as the customer notes like doctors notes can be about you personally these are just extras to the data release.

 

Possibly Lloyds are using it to hide the fact that they have no way to monitor manuel intervention and hope we will all get confussed and run away.;)

BL

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

on my customer notes i have from august 2001 -april2002 14 MOSTDLET that say underneath automatically generated then12 which have some entry against them i`e a name and a code then everything after that just says MOSTDLET but no automatically generated i think they are attempting to boggle us and to be honest its completely worked with me most of the codes are LU904 then by2004 they have changed to EM903 everything after 2004 is an EM 90SOMETHING. it is difficult to pair up certain entrys with certain charges as the charges semm to be the month after or the month after that i think i`m just going to forget about the first 2 years and just stick with the last 4 for which i can cross reference against the online statements. coz to be honest i aint a clue what i am looking at here

LLOYDS TSB

DPA: REQUEST SENT: 11-04-06

RECEIVED 28-O4-06

PRELIM LETTER SENT: 04-05-06

RECEIVED SOD OFF:06-05-06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what two of them are now as I have kept the last two letter from LTSB about stuff bouncing etc.

 

Once I have the list I will post them all, so don;t worry about them for now. I hope to have the definitive list by next weekend.

 

LOULA

Link to post
Share on other sites

im just going for the full amount that i can see by the charges and statements.

 

Its up to them to tell me if they think its incorrect and why. Then they can advise where..

 

they are just being a pain.:-x rant LOL ( mood swing)

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BL,

 

Yes, go for the full amount, but if they ever say they have had to impose the chrges for manual intervention, we will know the correct code reasoning and argue for further justice.

 

LOULA

Link to post
Share on other sites

EM903, EM SOMETHING

 

I have worked out these are the computer identity numbers,

reason is i saw a manager 3 times

2 in her own office

1 in the next Office.

 

This number changed a didgit on the move.

 

also have sorted some of the others but no papers with me now to put them here.

The way I have worked it out the customers notes don't contain the manuel intervention for charges.

 

its computer ID, server ID, user ID, possible branch location.

then some are repeated in the second line.

and i have an ideal of some of the letters but can't remember them of by heart

 

But!! we must wait to see what the bank confirms.

 

BL

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do a DPDR you must recieve it in an intelligible form , if they use abbreviations without an explanation of what those abbreviations stand for then it is not intelligible.If you look at this thread you will see what BF said about it and also my letter to carphonewarehouse ater I recieved my data that was full of abbreviations

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3823

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do a DPDR you must recieve it in an intelligible form , if they use abbreviations without an explanation of what those abbreviations stand for then it is not intelligible.If you look at this thread you will see what BF said about it and also my letter to carphonewarehouse ater I recieved my data that was full of abbreviations

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=3823

 

checky sods they must know this, so surely they fall out of the DPA request time

 

or..

 

could it be written into teh DPA requests that an abbreviation breakdown is requested for all non legibal codes,

BL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Y'all

 

Only new too this whole forum so please excuse my stupidity. I have been a customer of Lloyds TSB for around 5 years now and if I were to calculate all of my charges for being over my limit and bounced direct debits then I reckon it could top a thousand pounds if not more. This is mainly due to me being a student and travelling. What are the chances in me claiming this money back or at least a part of it back as I could really do with it. I simply cannot see how they can justify the amount they charge and want to do something about it. Any advice?

 

Thanks

Tom8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Hello, you haven't read the forum yet, so please read it and start your own thread if you have any questions after this, as you are hijacking someones thread...

 

Louise

Link to post
Share on other sites

...... LS902 LM902 LM901 AK208 OF203 XP901 UB901 LH901 LH923 EM901 EM902 EM925 EM909 Not forgeting AG242 second class central 3299681 Bullivant,Janet 30943900

Frankly theyve done a good job of perplexing me!!

You to by the sound of it..

 

I've got a explanation page in with my dpa stuff.

 

I'll scan it in tomorrow, but

 

LS902 - Advise o/d: suggest increase limit is discussed: retry

LM902 - Limit exceeded:credit/contact no more increase

LM901 - Limiy exceeded: contact to discuss

 

etc, etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...