Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPML/LMC anyone claimed for mis selling and unfair charges?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is this just OLD news though? seen all this before?

 

Not really Jetli, I could be wrong but I think this is the first SPML/SPPL case that directly involves the SPV.

 

Hopefully when this case is concluded and published, it will detail why the SPV is the named respondent.

 

This case could have a significant bearing on future cases involving SPPL and SPML (where the loan/mortgage has been securitised).

 

Which by default may have an impact upon the ability for claims to be brought in the name of SPPL and/or SPML in the future and could also bring into question/doubt cases involving these companies that have previously decided, such as your own.

 

Of course until it is published this is pure speculation and may lead to nothing more than more debate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that it's being suggested in the States that the regulators are getting closer & closer to those who have profited from these what they are beginning to consider are unlawful securitizations unlawful because of the secrecy that surrounds them both in respect of investors AND borrowers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone post a brief case history of the walker case?

 

I would do this myself but I am diverted by numerous other pressing matters.

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

On appeal from the Court of Appeal of England & Wales (Civil Division)IssueThe correct definition of an amount of credit under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and whether the 1974 Act permits interest to be charged on a sum which is not part of the total amount of credit, but is a charge for credit.FactsOn 26 March 2005 the Appellants applied for a loan, and a fixed sum credit agreement was made between the parties on 20 April 2005. The Respondents loaned the Appellants £17,500 on the terms set out in the Agreement, which was secured by a mortgage on the Appellants’ home. That mortgage was the second charge on the home. The Appellants are in arrears, totalling at least £40,000, and risk losing their home. On 21 June 2007 a District Judge granted a suspended order for possession of the property on terms that the Appellants made the payments due and paid off arrears in instalments.

 

The hearing date is the 13th May and listed as a 1 day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly this case won't be as interesting as I had first thought.

 

Business Name

Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc

 

Company Registration Number

5456430

 

Licence Number

0572040

 

Categories

Consumer credit

Consumer hire

Credit brokerage

Credit reference agency

Debt adjusting/counselling

Debt collecting

 

 

SPS 05-02 has a consumer credit licence had has since 25 June 2005

 

I incorrectly assumed (always a mistake to make assumptions) that the respondent didn't have a licence....

Link to post
Share on other sites

no no no no

 

this case is of extreme importance in many levels,

 

dont dismiss it

 

True but not what I was hoping for...

 

I was hoping that the respondent would be an unauthorised company(in terms of OFT and FSA). As would be the case in a similar situation with SPML SPV's (FSA rather than OFT)

Edited by Suetonius
Link to post
Share on other sites

It has at least dismissed one myth that has previously been posted in that the SPV will not bring proceedings (not good news)

 

It should also clarify the matters relating to assignment and the title to sue issue.

 

Also finally determine the correct definition of an amount of credit under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and whether the 1974 Act permits interestlink3.gif to be charged on a sum which is not part of the total amount of credit, but is a charge for credit. This of course is important to everyone and not limited to SPPL etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

What interests me also is whether the Walkers received in the interim period the required s136 notice from sppl transferring the legal title to the loan to the spv.If no such notice has been served the legal titleholders are still sppl.The significance of this being that that the substituted spv has no title to sue as they are only the equitable titleholders.

This could entail to the embarssment of the spv the resubstitution of parties with sppl being restored as the claimant.

 

  1. The Walkers fell into arrears, which already top £40,000. They risk losing their home in the possession proceedings taken by SPPL. According to SPPL's Statement of Estimated Costs lodged in this court a grand total of £100,021 in legal costs is also claimed against the Walkers if SPPL win the appeal.
  2. For their part SPPL said that, if the judge was right, the Walkers would stand to gain a windfall of over £40,000 and the clearance of the second charge on the Property. SPPL would be faced with the prospect of cases of irrecoverable contextup.png loans contextdown.png made to other borrowers
  3. .As extracted from the original appeal court decision made in favour of sppl the costs of these proceedings for the loser will be astronomical for the sake of a £17500 second mortgage,for the Walkers probably certain bankruptcy.

Edited by actionnotwords
Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres a wierd thing!! Got a redemption from SPPL - no headed paper and gave me the account details to pay into - account name in there name - OK fine BUT it was sent with their Solictitors letter informing me that there is an additional charge for there legal fees on top of redemption and they have givin me their account deatails to redeem the mortgage. On the letter from SPPL (not headed) it states that the figure includes all legal fees and arrears collection fees:???:

 

I will be telling my Solicitors to pay SPPL as obviously there solicitors cannot remove the charge. Dont you think it is all abit strange. I requested this myself as ou Solicitors have asked Capstone for redemption - it will be very interresting to see if there figurs differ and they ask us to pay into there account.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical..you caught up with the payments and they didn't enforce any breach of the court order. Don't get your hopes up that they will reply in the way you want them to first time around. Be prepared for a fight with the ignorant f'''''s. The court costs is the hard part to get back, but it can be done if you show it shouldn't have gone that far. Ask them to provide you with the receipts. SAR everyone to get the info. you need against them.

 

 

Just thought I would let you know crapstone never miss an opportunity to suck the last drop of blood out of you they are at it, at every turn.The data info you suggested i ask for will cost me £10.00 lol!!:lol:

 

Not to mention that every time I phone sppl or crapstone on their 0845 numbers, they are profiting from my phone calls, so just to make the most of it they stick me on hold for ages and when they finally get back to me I am paying them to give me abuse.:eek: Am I insane??? I can find someone off the street to do that for free. lol!! Their isnt a strong enough word in the english dictionary that could describe adequately enough how I feel about these morons.:mad::roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres a wierd thing!! Got a redemption from SPPL - no headed paper and gave me the account details to pay into - account name in there name - OK fine BUT it was sent with their Solictitors letter informing me that there is an additional charge for there legal fees on top of redemption and they have givin me their account deatails to redeem the mortgage. On the letter from SPPL (not headed) it states that the figure includes all legal fees and arrears collection fees:???:

 

I will be telling my Solicitors to pay SPPL as obviously there solicitors cannot remove the charge. Dont you think it is all abit strange. I requested this myself as ou Solicitors have asked Capstone for redemption - it will be very interresting to see if there figurs differ and they ask us to pay into there account.:rolleyes:

 

BUMP MY POST

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would let you know crapstone never miss an opportunity to suck the last drop of blood out of you they are at it, at every turn.The data info you suggested i ask for will cost me £10.00 lol!!:lol:

 

Not to mention that every time I phone sppl or crapstone on their 0845 numbers, they are profiting from my phone calls, so just to make the most of it they stick me on hold for ages and when they finally get back to me I am paying them to give me abuse.:eek: Am I insane??? I can find someone off the street to do that for free. lol!! Their isnt a strong enough word in the english dictionary that could describe adequately enough how I feel about these morons.:mad::roll:

 

Do it as a dispute. Tell them you want the info and you are not going to pay for it as you believe they had made errors. You have to be very firm otherwise you'll go around in circles with them. I made it clear it wasn't my job to follow up their mistakes and I certainly wasn't going to pay for it.

 

Don't call them..put it all in writing and mail or fax it to them. They lie all the time over the phone. Establish a contact name for you complaints, and insist it's dealt by them and not some numpty.

 

It takes time but I know how you feel right now. xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do it as a dispute. Tell them you want the info and you are not going to pay for it as you believe they had made errors. You have to be very firm otherwise you'll go around in circles with them. I made it clear it wasn't my job to follow up their mistakes and I certainly wasn't going to pay for it.

 

Don't call them..put it all in writing and mail or fax it to them. They lie all the time over the phone. Establish a contact name for you complaints, and insist it's dealt by them and not some numpty.

 

It takes time but I know how you feel right now. xxx

 

Thankyou for your advice hun:)

I will do that and I already said in my last letter to them that I refuse point blank to deal with them by phone and pointed out the reason as being that they lie and make you out to be a liar too. So I want every thing in writing so there is no confusion. In a letter back to me at the end they put we have noted that you do not wish to communicate by telephone, however we telephoned you on an number of occasions today and could not get a reply. Jeeez are these guys stupid or what???:???::rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think you have hijacked at all cher! :)

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received news that the excellent site formerly called capstonewatch has now been renamed for the sake of wider and greater exposure as capstone mortgage services.

The renaming should hopefully bring the site to the attention of the thousands in need of assistance from the behaviour of these gutter scoundrels.

This is the link,please visit the site for all the information you require.It is essential reading and a compilation of all the relevant material contained in these 300 pages and more.

http://capstonemortgageservices.wordpress.com/author/capstonewatch/

 

(copy and paste into your browser)

Edited by actionnotwords
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ANW

 

Your link doesn't seem to work, but don't worry; with a little bit of digging I was able to find this.

 

About this blog… Capstone Mortgage Services

 

Is this the one you meant?

 

EiE.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

am not sure what you are implying, i hope its not negative

however, since i started my investigations, i have found the straight forward solution to get the information you want and make a case,

i have progressed to actually taking action,

if you clarify what you are saying and have any questions to raise you are welcomed,

just dont make up your mind before you know the facts

 

sincerely

 

Let's put any doubt concerning 'implication' to one side.

 

I'm stating unequivocally that many people come here for advice. They don't come to be fleeced for more cash than they have already been fleeced of by the sub-prime jackals and fraudsters.

 

If you have gleaned something from your participation in this site, then have the good manners to share it with others FOR FREE as hundreds of others who have gone before you have.

 

I've received and given tons of advice here and I've never been charged, nor have I charged, for any of it.

 

I WOULD NOT DREAM OF DOING SO AND IF I DID I WOULD BE RIGHTLY BARRED FROM POSTING HERE.

Edited by enoughisenough

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Message for the site team. Rather than move this offensive money grubbing post can I make a plea for its continued inclusion so that the rest of the thread can see it and comment upon it?

 

Much appreciated. EiE.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...