Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OPS windscreen PCN - No permit in office car park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm a newbie so please go easy on me!

 

Today I received a "Parking" Charge Notice from One Parking Solution Limited at my office car park.

 

What should I do pay or appeal?

 

My gut instinct is to appeal because my permit was in the car (in the driver's door pocket). I normally put in the windscreen each day, but today was my first day back in the office after 1.5 weeks and I forgot (stupid I know).

Please help...

 

Answers to the questions below

 

WINDSCREEN (Notice To Driver)

 

1 The date of infringement?

30/01/2019

 

2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?]

No

 

Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days]

No, not yet

 

What date is on it?

Did the NTK provide photographic evidence?

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

N/A

 

3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?]

N/A

 

4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK,

did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process?

[it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances]

N/A

 

5 Who is the parking company?

N/A

 

 

6. where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park?

My Office car park in [Westside Hemel Hempstead]

 

Also attached are a copy of the parking charge notice (redacted) and I will a photo of the sign in the next post (size limitations).

 

Edited by dx100uk
pdf removed ref no showing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the parking sign, most of it is in really small font!

 

Also, when I go to the appeals section of their website they have taken 12 photos of my car angles all around.

360 degrees from front windscreen to rear windscreen, sides and front again. Then a front of car photo with the sign in the distance.

OPS_-_Parking_Sign_-_30012020.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPS windscreen PCN - No permit in office car park

had to remove you pcn you left ref no showing.

 

get the photos from the website too.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCN with ref removed nowww

OPS_-_Parking_Charge_Notice_-_30012020.pdf

 

Photos from website attached now too.

 

I want to add, I have a car park plan and email which highlights which spaces I can park in based on the company I work for. The space that I am is included in this and you can see my colleagues' cars either side of me (reg numbers hidden).

 

 

Some additional information which probably makes no difference, but I will be taking my private reg off the car, this weekend which was on the car at the time in question and putting the original reg back on.

 

I will be selling the car next weekend and leaving the country mid-Feb due to a job relocation (planned for a while now).

But I will be coming back in a few years so do not want any trouble waiting for me when I get back!

pix.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

 who owns the land?

how does your employer make the arrangements for the use of the spaces it has with the landowner?

 

Chances are that OPC doesnt have the right to enforce anything in the spaces allocated to your employer so the first port of call is them and get them to tell OPC to get lost.

 

What does your employment contract say about parking(if anything).

Normally there will be something on the intranet about this and so it becomes  a term .

 

As this is a screen ticket the parking co have to wait 28 days before they can do anything.

The cherished reg will still be yours so the DVLA will have those details even if the car is a mismatch.

The parking co will ask who was the keeper on such a date and that is what they have to go on, not who owns the car at some point in the future As for problems stored up, you will have arranged some method of redirecting your post surely?

 

I also note that they show no close up of the front screen, the only view that would support their claim of no permit displayed. Many parking cowboys select an angle to show a lack of ticket on purpose knowing that it is tucked down and can only be seen close up. They do this to chisel money out of people when none is due.

 

Also they know that a permit has been issued to a car with your reg so it is a dishonest claim if they do process this further

Link to post
Share on other sites

A landlord owns the land and the building that the company I work for leases.

It is the landlord that has instructed OPS to enforce these parking terms this year.

The company I work for has about 480 spaces out of a possible 600.

They are allocated. 

 

My employer will not tell get them to get lost unfortunately and there is no mention of parking in my contract.

 

Thanks EB.

 

Yes, they have been lazy because the car park has ANPR barrier access and my reg is registered for my company in order for me to gain automated access to the car park. I have a permit allocated to me with a unique number and the space I was in is allocated to my employer. If they checked this information they would know I am entitled to park there.

 

Yes and the lack of closeup photos does look suspicious.

Should I appeal to them directly on these grounds?

They ask for driver or keeper details which is better to provide without making their lives easier?

 

Yes I will access to my post for at least the next 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked your employer to tell OPS to leave its staff alone or are yu just guessing?

I am not suggesting that your employer tells their landlord what to do but OPS arent their landlord and they ahve an agreement that trumps the contract with OPS in most circumstances.

 

f you rent a flat the landlord cant tell you who may visit you, there is an entitlement of quiet enjoyment and your employer has that entitlement not to be bothered by a third party that has no interest in their lease of a business premises. Hence they ahve the power to tell OPC to get lost and keep their nosesout of their affairs.

 

Now if your relationship with your employer is so bad you cant ask them to get this cancelled then you should consider what else they they offer and do that makes them a less than good employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My relationship with my employer is pretty actually, they are the reason I am relocating.

I just think we have enough trouble with landlord and they want to stay on good terms with them.

 

I just want to fight with OPS and give them a hard time instead of simply handing over my £60/£100.

Ideally with a loophole / technicality...

Link to post
Share on other sites

technicality?

your employer hasn't given them permission to enforce on the spaces they have leased and you have a permit so they know you are authorised by your employer to be there even if you dont display it.

 

If they cant be bothered to check the list they have they deserve to lose a court claim.

 

Your problem is you want this fixed in under a month and only your employer has the power to tell OPC to get lost but you wont ask them. it is not about loopholes as you will win a court claim,

it is about not having to go there in the first place and using all the resources necessary to get this over and done with.

 

we can be here in a year and help you with your court pappers but wouldnt you rather just knock it on the head now?

 

If you approach the parking co they are going to reject your appeal because the only way they make money on someone else's land is to issue spurious charges and hope people pay up.

 

They are not going to admit to you they dont have a leg to stand on so forget about decency, fairness ect, they dont have it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate your comments on this.

 

I asked my employer and they said others have asked them to get involved.

But if they do it for one, they will have to do it for many others too and it could become a minefield and time consuming (we all have jobs to do).

So that is not an option.

 

If it goes to a court claim I am happy to take it there, with the help of this forum course.

Should I win I will donate the amount of the fine to this forum (a much more worthy cause than OPS).

 

In the interest of moving this forward, what is the next step?

Go through their pointless appeal process?

What do I say and do I say I am the keeper or driver?

 

Keeper I presume...

Link to post
Share on other sites

FINE , where does any paperwork use that word?

 

no you don't appeal ever to the PPC

but don't ever ignore a letter of claim from a solicitor whom states their client is the PPC, should you ever get one.

 

sounds like you need to be educating your employer about contract law and speculative invoices 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I need to be careful of my wording.

 

What do I do now, just sit and wait for them to send me letters?

 

Can I go straight to the BPA or POPLA?

I don't imagine this will go away by itself.

 

About 20 people got tickets in the first week of January 2020 when this was introduced, I don't know them personally though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bpa and popla are merely old boys clubs run by the PPC's themselves 

 

already said above what you need to do, and eb has pointed out very pertinent things regarding these tickets and the way these operator conduct themselves.

 

the best thing you can do is read a few 100 pcn threads in this very same forum as you started yours in...so you can educate your work colleagues and all get together and hit your employer hard to run these cowboys out of their car park.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...