Jump to content


Erudio claimform - old SLC Loans


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if it was within a few year max 2 then ok

but as it wasn't hey Lowell..prove it cough up!!

 

cant see the claim going anywhere anyway

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just hang on...why not scan redact and upload what you do have....which you should have already uploaded for opinion...before making statement of what you did receive and yet never questioned it validity.

 

Then you can submit a defence with honesty and truthful content.

 

andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's an idea

scan everything to ONE multipage PDF

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

here we go. Apologies for the quality, had to use a scanning app on my iPhone but they're in date order and legible. I've attached two remedies of account if that helps. I haven't scanned the notice of sums in arrears or annual statements.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay firstly the Notice of Assignment...original agreement numbers or the new assigned number ?

 

With regards to the default....all seems correct legal form and content but is stopping attending a course a breach of the agreements and did you stop making payments...was you making any payments ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

4, 9,10 have ref no's showing.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, could you delete that one? This one should have them all redacted.

 

Andy, the notice of assignment had the original SLC mortgage loan numbers and an SLC account number, but not Erudio's new account number. I wasn't making payments, however on a deferral form I sent to Erudio in 2015 I had filled in a direct debit so had assumed they would take payments if I wasn't in deferral.

 

erudio-edit.pdf

 

The only other thing to add is that there are two years of loans because I changed courses - these are the two from the course I switched to. However when I did that the SLC messed up and separated my loans - now the two loans from my original course are with Honours and the two loans from the course I switched to are with Erudio. Don't know if that has any legal impact.

 

Regarding the defence, unfortunately I need to go to work in a minute and was going to submit it before I left. Should I stick with the original defence in post 15?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point 2 of the defence in post #15 changed to......

 

2. Paragraph 3 and 4 are noted.The Defendant is aware of the service of a Default Notice pursuant to section 87 of the  Consumer Credit Act 1974 however the breach alleged is not a valid reason for issue given the agreements were deferred previously.Furthermore should that default notice be judged to be valid the original creditor nor its assignee failed to serve Notice of Sums in Arrears pursuant to section 86b  (2b) of the CCA1974 and is therefore prohibited to  enforce any agreements.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help. I'd already submitted the original defence by the time this got through but emailed through an updated one. Either way I hope this can be solved through mediation before (if ever it gets to trial).

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't want to ever consider resolving at mediation.

 

it wont go anywhere but left to get stayed I bet.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio claimform - old SLC Loans
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...