Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the scrappage scheme is nothing to do with the agreement ...sorry. it's an enticement to purchase a replacement vehicle. just the same as shop signs that say 50% off or whatever.  its a done and dusted deal done before you enter into the agreement for the remaining £sum. 
    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • This is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Future comms! joseph Stickler


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Joined future comms in 2016 and at the start they were great.

Paid my final bills off from EE and the deal they gave us was the best around! 

 

Then 2017 I had a call to ask if I wanted to lower my tariff which I did but didn’t realise it would renew for another 3 year contract.

 

Then in 2018 due to my wife’s phone being knackered I asked them what deals they had in order to get my wife a new phone. I explained that I didn’t have my own business etc but they stated this didn’t matter it would just be a renewal.

 

The new contract they offered came with a £28 manual discount each month and this is where my experience with this company started to go wrong.

 

I haven’t received this discount at all since November 2018. 

They put the discount in writing because I asked it to be, then I have also had a further email in writing stating I should have this discount.

 

Then I complained to plan and they also put this in writing.

I have given up trying to speak to anyone over the phone as it’s just a waste of time really

 

. I have requested a copy of my phone call where they stated in the contract agreement I would get this discount (again I made sure she stated it)

 

. I still haven’t received this copy of the call yet and to be honest I don’t think I will. Well not until I actually get the ICO involved and they request it to be given to me which I am I the process of doing. 

 

Oh and also to add they have given me numerous excuses why this money hasn’t been paid, such as “the accountant has changed” “it will be paid in the first week of every month” “no actually the 18th” “we don’t have your bank account details” the list goes on. I have now given them my account details 3 times and still no joy. 

 

I think the only way forward now would be CISAS or small claims court. I wouldn’t recommend them to anyone. I even have a friend of mine who is with them and he is even worse off than me.

 

update from the above also is that I complained to plan.com as stated and now they have come back to me and stated that:

 

My colleague was with Future Comms at the end of last week looking to resolve any customer issues, I believe this payment will be made for you on 28th March

Kind regards

 

we will see........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them an sar

then when you dont get it 

goto the ico and the fos

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes send SAR immediately.  Also read customer services guide and implement the advice there.

 

More later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to try and condense this, you engaged with Future Comms to broker a telephone services contract for you with some company. I imagine it was O2 please confirm.

The benefit to you is that you will receive a "cashback" of £28 per month.

Since November you have not received anything despite chasing them.

This means that so far they owe you about £100 and you are being put up with excuses every time you try to raise the matter.

You have also asked them to provide you with some data – but it is not clear whether this was a request made in the form of an SAR.

We have advised you that you should send a formal SAR immediately.

If you have some writing in which you asked for the data then please will you reproduce it here.

Also, I understand that you have been dealing with them on the telephone despite the fact that this is a suspicious company and you are already feeling concerned about them. Yet you have been speaking with them on the phone and you have no record for yourself and you are attending to rely on the fact that they may have record-keeping and that they may be prepared to supply you with the evidence you need.

I've already suggested above that you read our customer services guide and the you implement the advice there. You really shouldn't make phone calls to any company you deal with without recording the court. It's an unfortunate fact of life that this is necessary. If you don't recall your calls then you will regret it. Sooner or later you will regret it – and may be that time is coming very soon.

What we are receiving here seems to be a standard M.O. in respect of Future Comms. I have no idea why anybody stands for it and why anybody is prepared to tolerate these kinds of delays in this level of excuses.

One problem for most customers of Future Comms is that they are business customers and that means that if they want to take Future Comms to court then any hearing will have to be brought in the court which is local to the defendant and that means local to Future Comms nearest county court.

You have an advantage in that I understand that you are a personal customer. This means that under the usual rules, if there is a hearing then because you would be a litigant in person, the case would be heard in your own local court. This would put additional pressure on Future Comms because if they wanted to attend the hearing then they would have to travel to you.

However, on the basis of what you say I don't really see that there is much of a problem. If you are prepared to threaten legal proceedings and then to issue them, I can imagine that Future Comms will fall into line very quickly and pay you out.

Of course there is a risk that they may be silly and they may try to defend the case – but I doubt it.

So what it comes down to is whether you are prepared to sue them. This means that you would have to send them a letter before claim and give them 14 days and to pay you all of the money that they owe you or else you will bring a small claim in the County Court and without any further notice.

I can imagine that part of their M.O. is to take it to the wire and to pay quite rapidly once they receive a letter of claim. This is good news – and yet it is bad news. It means that you get your money and that's good. However, it means that they can play you around and keep on delaying payments until they receive a letter of claim.

Because of this and because of their M.O. I would suggest that you send a more general letter of claim.

I would suggest that you tell them that in view of their business model which appears to be consistent all over the Internet – or delaying payments – that you are now serving them with notice that unless you have your money within 14 days that you will see them and that furthermore they should consider that this is equally a warning that if they delay on any future payment that you will be bringing a legal action immediately and without any notice in respect of that action. They should therefore consider your letter of claim as being a letter of claim which is recurring and effective every month.

If this idea appeals to you – then you must be certain that you are prepared to bring the legal action if they cause the delay. This means that on day 15 if they don't pay back your hundred pounds or so – you sue. After that, every month if one day one you have received your payment, then you sue. I'm quite sure that you would only need to issue the papers once and they probably won't trouble you again.

If this idea appeals to you then please draft out a letter of claim and post it here and we will discuss it and then you should send it off.

You should also read around this forum as to how to bring a small claim in the County Court. It's very easy. It's very cheap. And in your case with a likelihood of success of much better than 95% – it is pretty well risk-free.

You should also log onto the County Court money claim website. Register for an account – it's free – and start to understand how it works. You can also start drafting your claim and save your work as you go along so that on day 15 you are ready to click the papers off.

If you post your suggested draft here then we will have a look at it. It does need any special language. The trick is to keep it as short as possible. You will also claim interest which are 8% is pretty good nowadays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all 

 

Thank you for the advice again with work and being on holiday I am in the process of sending the SAR this weekend. 

 

Just an an update though, I complained to plan as stated and they have stated that I will be paid the discount by FC on the 28th March. Then I sent an email and asked for an update from them to see if they heard anything further. They stated as far as they are aware it has been agreed that I will be paid on the 28th. 

 

Well low low and behold I get a phone call out of the blue from FC today stating that the director has signed off my payment and it will be paid on the 28th April!! I could of burst out laughing! I stated what plan said above and they would like me to forward them the email so they can see if they can speed this up. 

 

Yeah ok then 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that as well as forwarding them the email, you forward them a letter of claim and explain to them very clearly what will happen if they miss the deadline by even one day – that you will issue the court papers.

Also please see one or two of the other Future Comms threads where I have now suggested that you should send a single letter of claim making it clear that this is a continuous rolling-over letter of claim and that in future any time they miss a deadline by a single day the court papers will be issued. Tell them that you are justifying that by their previous history and their very clear record of late payments which are documented throughout the Internet.

Do not get mucked around by these people. They obsolete a delaying game. They will call your bluff on your letter of claim and will try to push it by being a day late, a couple of days late, three days late – don't stand for any more if you want to take control of this. So far they have dominated you. Is that you want?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm slightly losing track of the various Future comms threads that are going here. If you have already send the letter of claim then if I were you I wouldn't respond to them except with court papers when they exceed the deadline.

Don't get dragged into conversations with these people. You made your position clear in a letter of claim. There's nothing else to say. Issue the court papers and you can almost guarantee that they will never do it again

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way, if you have the names of any of these so-called directors – or anyone else you are dealing with. Post them up here.

We may as well start putting some identities up here. Don't be shy

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are several companies called future comms, all with different directors. One has no director at all so breaking the law.

I would bet they all have cashflow problems and that is why you havent got your cashback. If you do go down the court route make sure you name the correct entity

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point

It seems to be this one - but needs confirmation

image.thumb.png.3857c4bb2c0192fcf99199e91273f664.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Think you must be right. The address I have is Joe Stickler, managing director, Future Communications Specialists, Unit 4The Mill Office, Royal Clarence Marina, Gosport, Hampshire, PO12 1AX.

Wonder how many more addresses there are??!

My last email was from Liam Stickler, Business Development Manager. Seems it runs in the family.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update all, 

 

I have now been paid 90% of what I was owed. I complained to plan.com and put pressure on them to sort it out with FC. They took it right up until the last day of the eighth week and to be fair didn’t pay when they said they would. Next day I got on to plan about it and stated I would be in touch with ofcom and like magic I had money in my account. 

 

When I rang FC on the day they were meant to pay they stated they hadn’t got my bank details although I had gave them over 3 times previous. 

 

I am still owed some money albeit not a huge amount but plan are aware of this. I have stated that if this occurs again then court action will be the only way forward for me which I have been prepared to do. 

 

In relation to the recording of the phone call I requested which has been ignored. I have complained to the ICO and plan about this as they are clearly denying me a copy of my personal information. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update 

 

I have now received another email from plan.com stating that they are in touch with FC over my SAR and small amount of money that is still owed. 

 

Then i receive 2 emails this afternoon with copies of my recordings from FC and an email with the confirmation of payment (the one they already have paid me) 

 

plan then sent me an email to say I should have received this and also FC stated they would pay the final last amount of the discount I was owed today. (They paid 90% just calculated it wrong)  I haven’t received the final part of my owed money yet so I have stated to plan until this is receive my complaint will remain open as they wanted to close it. 

 

I will update when I hear anything more 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Future comms! joseph Stickler
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...