Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claim form - old studio debt***Claim Discontinued***


bloodline67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1734 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Upload redacted copies for opinions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats all they have and what their claim is based on ?  No agreement no default notice ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its not a default notice.....its a Notice of Assignment ....1 from the OC and 1 from the debt buyer (lowell)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain keep asking questions, but does that’s make a difference?

Also do they have to send the default notice to me?

 

If they should have sent it or don’t have it does that also mean they can’t enforce the debt?

 

once again thanks for your time Andy 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get up to speed on the Credit Consumer Act 1974.

 

Section 87 (1)

 

87 Need for default notice.

(1)Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

 

(a)to terminate the agreement, or

(b)to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

(c)to recover possession of any goods or land, or

(d)to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

(e)to enforce any security.

 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/87

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its up to you.....mediation has no interest in law or legislation...they simply act as a go between to narrow the differences and hopefully get parties to agree an amicable solution without the need for the claim to progress to allocation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Andy, just got off the phone to the mediator and told them I couldn’t proceed with the mediation as I wasn’t happy with some of the information provided and as I had only just received the information today I needed more time to get some legal advice.

So time will tell what Lowell wants to do, just hope I’ve made the right decisions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well Lowell’s have decided to proceed with the small claims as I’ve now had a court letter informing me the case is to be heard at the beginning of August unless the claimant pays the court fees by the 11th July.

 

Ive read through the letter a couple of times now but am unsure what I need to do next, it mentions a witness statement, do I need to do one now or do I wait until Lowell’s send me the required documentation in case they’re different to the ones they emailed me?

 

Any advice would be helpful as the last thing I want is a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we no its not lowells deciding to go fwd.. they send back their DQ ages ago.

its the natural next step in the courts own process as mediation failed, as it always does in these speculative claim case

now the important bit is if lowells pay the fee - who blinks first.

 

ideally you should await lowells WS.

you don't have to exchange them till/by 14 days before the hearing date

 

there are lots of CAT debt or no default witness statements here already 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I’ve now had a letter from Lowell’s solicitors offering me the option to settle by way of a Tomlin Order which I need to reply to in seven days or else they’ll pay for the court hearing.

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

std letter if you'd been reading around during your 'downtime'

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just type no need to hit reply with quote everytime please

 

you don't need individual help at this stage.

we cant be wasting our time on silly questions that are simply self answered by YOU doing your bit which is:

during your downtime between the stages to selfhelp yourself and get reading up.

others need our help with more pressing matters.

 

just about every recent Lowell claimform thread has the self same letter with replies with advice already

 

I hark you back to my blinking comment before...

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for nothing dx, I’ve questioned your attitude before and to be honest it is unhelpful and sometimes down right rude.

I thought this forum was for helping people but obviously I was wrong.

 

For someone with mental health issues, such as myself, asking for help can be the hardest thing to do, as can trawling through what seems like hundreds of posts trying to find the answers.

 

I have no idea what to do so I’m going to give up and just pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bloodline67 said:

I’ve now had a letter from Lowell’s solicitors offering me the option to settle by way of a Tomlin Order which I need to reply to in seven days or else they’ll pay for the court hearing.

Any advice?

 

The Tomlin Order will be an option up to the day of the hearing so dont let this 7 days pressure knock you off course.

In your post#62 you refer to a letter and hearing date and that the claimant must pay the hearing fee by the 11th July.

 

This letter is  called the Notice of Allocation and contains the dates and directions what each party must prepare and submit and by what date,Both parties must submit a statement of case and disclosures on which their claim/defence relies on.There should be dates when you must prepare this by.

 

Check with the court on the the 11th July. and see if they have paid the hearing fee...this is a good signal of whether they intend to proceed.

Check your notice of allocation for the dates you must file and serve your statement and disclosures by.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your reply Andy I really appreciate it.

As the court is fast approaching I’m finding it increasingly stressful and difficult to concentrate trying to find the answers hence why I asked for help.

I hate being this way and asking for help but I feel like I’m in over my head.

 

I feel like I have a little bit of breathing space now knowing that it’s not just seven days.

I wanted to wait and see what documents they were going to send to see if they were the same as the ones they emailed me, then I can decide if going to court is the right thing, what do you think?

once again thank you for your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont throw in the towel just yet...its only just getting to the interesting part.

 

If they are relying on what they have already emailed...then they are going to require a Judge with no interest in legislation.

 

So check with the court on the 11th July to see if hearing fee paid.

Check your NOA and start to prep your statement and work out the date you have to submit by.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

its exactly why they send these letters b67.

that's why its so important to read other claimform threads

 

you'll then see what you are going to go thru and already know these things are nothing special to 'you alone'

sort of blows the wind out of their sails before they ever put them up when you've seen the same letters several times already before.

 

even if you think its not what is happening ..i will use any tool in my toolbox to enable you and prepared you to fight your corner

we cant be there on the day beside you but we can darn well toughen you up on what to expect if you don't stand up to them.

and that's easy!!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bloodline67 said:

Thanks for nothing dx, I’ve questioned your attitude before and to be honest it is unhelpful and sometimes down right rude.

I thought this forum was for helping people but obviously I was wrong.

 

For someone with mental health issues, such as myself, asking for help can be the hardest thing to do, as can trawling through what seems like hundreds of posts trying to find the answers.

 

I have no idea what to do so I’m going to give up and just pay.

Please please don't throw in the towel, just follow the excellent advice on here. In defence of DX he (or she) is very very clued up and always finds time to give advice but I am sure like us all he gets frustrated with it all. Just read through the tone and pay attention to the detail is my advice. There are more of us each day who where like you once, and now we fear no one especially tin pot debt collectors because of people like DX and Andy etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...