Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will have to be able to demonstrate that the game was faulty. This may include taking a screen video of what is happening. Follow our customer services guide to find out about recording your calls – but also about taking video screenshots
    • Lowell/CCJ Long story short, I have been working in my debts the last few months as I'm looking at getting a mortgage this year.   Alas my main issue is an old CCJ that I found from Lowell, it was for what I assume can be described as a doorstep loan. The date the CCJ is registered is from a person of time when I was working away on the other side of the country. However even on returning home I can hand on heart say i never saw any paperwork from the court (I may have seen it but I'm 99.9% sure I didn't. I emailed Lowell last year to ask if they would agree to a mutual set aside and was given the template answer of they had followed the correct procedure to file it etc. The only other thing maybe of worth adding is that the default on my file and the CCJ are for different amounts (please see attached pictures) So I guess I'm asking if I have any options of getting it set aside? I can afford the payment in one but wanted to check if I have options to have it set aside rather than just having it as satisfied on my file for another 4/5 years
    • 55-57, The Quadrant, High St, Windsor SL4 1LP, United Kingdom     Okay, are you prepared to bring a small claim in the County Court? If you don't know what that means then have read around this forum about small claims in the County Court and see the steps. It's very easy. Also, for this kind of money they will put their hands up and you will get your court fee back as well as your money – and you will have taught them a lesson which you can spread around the Internet. They want to play games? Here's a game for them.
    • The value of the card was £25. I purchased it last Thursday 20th. I did a search online and it seems it's not just me having this issue. 
    • Experts are saying the virus is likely to be present in parts of the UK, where people have come back from Italy and other hot spots. The person in Surrey may not have personally been in presence of a carrier, but someone they have met has been. Did you see that Wetherspoons have apparently said that those staff who self quarantine following advice from health services will not be paid. With Civil Service, if staff have had health services advice to not go to work for 14 days, once they have contacted line manager and it is accepted it relates to this virus, the absence can be treated as special leave. But the absence can be part of overall absence management.
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 511 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Just looking for advice please

 

 

1991, I lost an ET claim, at that time, I didn't have a specialist employment solicitor.

 

 

27 years on, times have changed and due to circumstances beyond my control, it's unfortunate I have an ET claim pending.

 

 

My question is, can the ET claim from 1991, be referred to during the current tribunal hearing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

 

1991 seems an awfully long time ago to be referring to something, but other people know more about ETs than I do. Is it the same employer?

 

 

I think we need more detail before we can advise.

 

 

Best, HB


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you think it may be referred to?

 

 

by you or them?


Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies

 

Different employer

 

Concerned it maybe referred to by them as some kind of defence, i.e. not the 1st time I've issued an ET claim

 

1991 was very poor legal representation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two Tribunal cases in 27 years shouldn't qualify you as a vexatious litigant

 

Was Cost awarded against you in the first case? That would have some influence (I would say little)

 

The usual position of the Tribunal is that each case must stand or fall on its own merit (see para 28 of Qdos Consulting Ltd & Ors v Swanson UKEAT/0495/11/RN)

 

What you need to concentrate on is the strength of this new claim I would forget about a case more than 20years ago

Edited by honeybee13
Paras

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the replies

 

Different employer

 

Concerned it maybe referred to by them as some kind of defence, i.e. not the 1st time I've issued an ET claim

 

1991 was very poor legal representation

 

 

That feels a little paranoid, and I am not sure how they would even know.


Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Costs were not awarded against me in the 1st claim.

 

 

I guess I am a little paranoid, that said, based on the advice from my legal team (employment law qualified) I have a very strong claim, based on my evidence ACAS ECS was declined by me, therefore, it's my opinion with supporting evidence, given the way I've been treated by my employer resulting and following an ET claim, the respondents are doing whatever they can in an attempt to destroy my character.

 

 

Thanks to you all for your input

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A previous claim does not matter, 2 in 30 years is hardly a vexatious litigant and a respondent raising that would be seen as quite desperate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...