Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mess up with housing benefit and council tax benefit


lynzfa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6179 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My mum recieved a letter today from the local council abouth her housing benefit,to say they were stopping her housing benefit due to an error on her claim.She was claiming housing benefit as she gets disability allowance for my brother,they were paying it for the las 3 years and have now said shw was overpaid as she only has 1 child that is disabled and not 2.She has never claimed for 2 disabled children and when she rang them regarding this they said it was an error on their system,but as she was still overpaid she still has to pay it back,so they have put a hold on her benefit until it is all paid back.Due to this though she is now £980 in arrears with her rent which her landlord is wanting asap.Where does she stand on this the council have told her she cannot appeal and there is nothing she can do about it.any advice would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has your mother thought about applying to the Benifits agency to see if she could get help from them as a hardship payment? Every council handles things in there own way so one council may say they will take it back a little at a time & another like yours want it asap. ring the DWP & see if they can help her even if its a loan I am am sure it will be better than trying to find such a high amount in one go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the council made the error, they absolutely are not allowed to try and reclaim the money and your mother has every right to refuse to pay it. You must get to a citizen's advice bureau and get help with this asap, especially if they have actually admitted it was their error.

 

My husband and I were overpaid about £400 housing benefit due to an error on their side. We didn't pay back a penny- in fact they didn't even ask us to, but admitted in the letter they sent to inform us that as it was their mistake they wouldn't be expecting repayment. Now all benefits are administered by Capita, this definitely is not just because we have a different council to you.

 

BTW my mum used to work for the DSS until 2 years ago, in the over- payments section. She agrees, their mistake,their loss.

 

I am outraged on your Mum's behalf and really hope she can win this one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Lynzfa

 

The council can try to recover the debt even if it is their fault, if they believe that the mistake was obvious to the person claiming housing benefit. However, just because they THINK it's obvious it does not mean it is.

 

It's very worthwhile to write a letter of Appeal, stating you wish to go to the Appeals Tribunal. You don't physically have to go there - it can all be done by post, and the chances of winning and getting the overpayment written off are very good. Your mum should make an appeal within a calendar month of the date she received the letter saying she was overpaid, but it can be made up to 13 months after the date of notification.

 

Did the council tell her in writing that she can not appeal against the decision? They can not decide this - only the independent Appeals Tribunal can say whether an appeal can proceed or not. She should definitely take this further - feel free to PM me if you need an assistance with this. (I have worked in Housing Benefits for 20 years, most recently as a trainer).

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it say on her award notice? If it shows 2 disabled children on her claim then they will try to say that she would have been notified of it. Just like with Tax Credits they tell you to check your award notice and if anything is wrong on it then you need to inform them immediately.

 

Have a look at her old awards or if she doesn't have them make a request under DPA if necessary for the backdated award notices.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also bear in mind that some notification letters (also known as award notices!) may just state if you wish a full breakdown please ask for further details. If the notice states this it is dubious to say the least. You should initially ask for copies of all notification letters, as these will be provided free of charge - you may have to pay if you make your request under the Data Protection Act.

 

Also, although an award notice may mention a disabled child premium it does not follow that your mother would understand this. People who work in Housing Benefits have difficulty following notification award letters, so Joe Public does not have much chance at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see some LA's award notices (as we called them where i worked) are very clear i take it that some are not then, I only ever saw ours and anyone would have clearly notice one extra person or premium on the claim. I didn't realise that some LA's donm't have breakdown, I tihnk that is something that needs to be changed.

 

We often saw cases of people getting awards with people on them who had moved out etc but failing to tell us, and also ones that were deemed complicated and each should be judged on its own merit and that of the claimant as well.

 

I am not pointing fingers nor laying blame, I am merely saying what they may try and do. I also said only make a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) if necessary. :)

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cheddar

 

Apologies if that sounded a bit short - I was just about to go to bed and thought I'd do a quick reply! Yes, you're quite right that a good local authority will provide proper notices, which detail everything on them in plain English, but an awful lot don't.

 

I've just finished working at one council that's gone onto a new housing benefits system, and they binned the first month's letters instead of sending them out as they didn't have time to check them! In a years time, if the claim is subject to intervention, who will remember/admit that the customer probably didn't get an award notice?

 

Also councils have lost appeals on the basis that a notification/award letter is not clear enough for a layperson to understand.

 

Where you mention that something needs to be changed about LA's who don't have breakdown - you're dead right, but the legislation already exists. They ignore it until a claimant challenges them, and as we know the majority of claimants don't have the knowledge to decide whether a notice is correct or not. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I'm not even sure you could get copies of your previous award notices, you certainly couldn't get them from the DWP as the computer generates a system award notice that is never seen on the actual benefit section. You could get a copy of the current award as the system can be prompted to issue one. They could give you a written breakdown of the previous years awards,but not actual copies of the originals. Would housing benefit keep copies? I know they don't use the same systems so would be interested to know, just nosy lol.

Interestingly years ago when benefit award notices were handwritten a carbon copy would have been kept in your file, thats progress for you :)

ali x

Btw I am no expert just give notes based on what I have read on here and other forums/sites, plus my own experiences and investigations.

 

All ccj's now dropped off file, 2 yrs to go to clear file.

All old debts either settled or made unenforcable.

 

RBS MPP-Full offer at 8 wks from first complaint

RBS Overdraft loanguard-full offer at 8 wks from complaint

Citicard ppi-with FOS finally paid 8 months after offer through FOS!

Capital one x2- with FOS

Monument ppi-with FOS

aqua x2 ppi-partialled settled still pushing for the rest

Black horse ppi-offers made and accepted except for one early loan they say no info held-still pushing for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...