Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor Lowell CCJ for a CCA re a Faulty3uk Phone


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey,

im hoping to get some advice on a debt that just won't go away.

It started when I got a contract phone from 3 uk and the phone didn't work properly.

I asked for a replacement but they said they could only repair so it went off for repair for a week and I got stuck with one of there lender brick phones.

 

Then I got it back but it still had the same problem so again it went for repair and I got the brick lender phone again.

Week later I got it back and still was broken, so i went in saying replace this or I'm ending the contract.

They offered to send it away again I refused and took all add ons off the contract but they wouldn't let me stop the contract itself so i told them to stick the contract and left. That was about 2010 when I cancelled and refuse any more contact with them.

 

Not long after lowell bought the debt and hassled me every week or 2 with colourful letters for years.

I refused to have any contact with them at all.

 

After years the letters got less and less until they stopped.

Last letter I think was 5 years ago and they went quiet.

 

A couple of weeks ago I got a very polite email from bw legal on behalf of lowell asking how they can help me settle the debt with lowell.

I instantly sent back a statute barred reply because the debt was so old.

 

I got a reply from them saying lowell took it to court in 2014 so not statute barred.

I received no court judgement sent to my address.

 

Now they are politely asking me to fill in a means form or do it online but i dont want to do anything to reactivate this debt for even longer.

Can anyone give any advice I just refuse to pay on principle if anything.

 

2018-04-24 BW re 2014-05-12 CCJ.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues in view of the CCJ..please continue to post here to your thread.

 

You can check your credit files or the CCJ Registry Trust.

 

https://www.trustonline.org.uk/understand-judgments-fines/entries-on-the-england-and-wales-register/ccjs-and-the-register

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main question is

can they keep taking this same debt to court,

 

i held lowell off for years i can hold bw legal off for another 2 years if they don't take it back to court.

 

I don't care about credit ratings as I don't like using credit I'm a cash only person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we could discuss the possibility of overturning the judgement – getting a set aside – and then challenging 3 for their breach of contract.

 

Maybe you could give us more information. Have you found a copy of the judgement yet?

 

Why might it have been that you hadn't received a copy of the claim or any of the preceding papers? Might you have moved home and not inform people of your address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say that "Lowell found me…", You make it sound as if you deliberately didn't inform anybody of your new address in order to escape the problem. Would you like to tell us a bit more?

 

Have you found a copy of the judgement on the CC J registry trust website which was posted for you above?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have took no interest in lowell's colourful letters in years and made no contact with them at all but every other important e.g. bank driving licence ect I informed I moved and even poll register so i wasn't hiding.

Cant check ccj until tomorrow when I get paid as my bank is empty.

I'm unemployed and I don't get benefits so live day to day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you really have no money then I suppose that you could continue to ignore them and hopefully get to 6 years beyond the CC J after which time it will be unenforceable. On the other hand, you say that you refuse to pay on principle – and if principle is that important to you then you could investigate the possibility of having the judgement set aside and then attacking O2 – although it would depend on what kind of information you can get from O2 if you send them an SAR.

 

If you did want to overturn the judgement them because you are unemployed, you would be able to get a fee waiver and with the new GDPR regime about to start on 25 May, the SAR would be free as well.

 

It's up to you how you want to play it and how much trouble you want to go to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you really have no money then I suppose that you could continue to ignore them and hopefully get to 6 years beyond the CC J after which time it will be unenforceable.

 

Assuming there is a CCJ (and that still should be the OP's first step, to check): It won't be unenforceable at 6 years. It will just become "only enforceable with the leave of the court", and also (potentially more relevant!) drop off the OP's credit report.

 

If it wasn't enforced for 6+ years on grounds of the OP being impecunious, the judgment creditor tried to keep in touch with the OP and the OP then won the lottery, I'd expect a court to allow enforcement after 6 years on the grounds it was 'just and fair'

If it wasn't enforced for 6+ years, the OP kept in touch with the creditor, and the creditor could have enforced it but just didn't bother : I'd expect a court to refuse permission if they went back for permission at 6+ years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets wait and see if there is a judgment first.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My next move is to try and buy some time and send them this reply, hopefully documentation has got lost over the 8 years

BW Legal Ref No. LIT/S65$$$

Enterprise House,

Apex View,

Leeds,

West Yorkshire.

LS11 9BH

30th April 2018

Dear Sirs

In regard to your Letter received on 28/4/2018

Before consideration of any private information as your company requests I first require further information from your company and your client Lowell Portfolio Ltd.

1:- I Require a copy of your complaints procedure

2:- I Require a copy of the original Signed agreement as covered by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

3:- I require a full financial breakdown of the alleged Debt

I enclose £1 Postal order which is intended Only for payment of copy of original signed agreement and under no circumstances to be misconstrued as a payment for the alleged debt.

Please send all Require information Within the timeframe allowed by law of 40 days of the date of this letter. Please note that copies of all correspondence will be recorded as evidence.

look forward to hearing from you.

yours sincerely

wayne $$$$$

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send that letter. I think that you are badly confused as to your various rights.

 

What are you trying to ask for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original signed agreement i signed with 3 uk phone service, when i bought that broken phone.

Instead of me proving i don't owe money i want them to prove that i do.

This is a pretty old debt that's now been past to a 2nd collection agency and i want them to put some effort into giving me what i ask for.

There is something wrong with this debt because i've dealt with lowell about this debt before and they was never polite like bw legal

if i found out someone had a debt and wrote to them don't they have a right to ask me of proof i have a right to ask for that money? thats what i want to ask them.

most agencies don't no much about the background of the debts they try to collect

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes don't send that please

gather info FIRST.

 

there is NO signed agreement so its pointless asking for that.

and anyway their need to now produce anything is long gone

the CCJ trumps that need.

 

you need to ring northants bulk and ask for a copy of the claimform AND the CCJ by email pdf.

 

then we can start to sort things out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

now that i understand,

i don't claim to be a freeman of the land stuff but i do believe there are things going on at Northampton bulk centre that are unlawful and illegal and them their selves dont like to claim liability

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothants bulk are mostly an automated bulk issuing court where not human checks anything.

 

not sure what you are saying, but it doesn't make sense..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah sorry

i thought you referred to northhampton bulk centre courts where most cases are judged online and they have no judges there.

a place where you find most ccj's against people from debt collection agencies and most councils

. if they do have a ccj against me in 2014 then i was sure it will be from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

same place

if its a default judgement [which this is] then no judge would ever had seen anything

its an automated process.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont find a record there

but you will on trustonline

but you must use the address the CCJ was registered against

 

doesn't matter what the age is, if its a default non contested judgement it will have been issued from northants, but they have no online records for you to search at all.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wanted to send some reply or they will carry on without me after 7 days they gave me to reply (they held back the letter 4 of those days)

3 days to reply some kind in OP of replying in first letter.

thats why i wrote that letter as its classed as a reply if its not the one they want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...