Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PE ANPR PCN - lido carpark cliftonville margate


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

Drove into carpark

didnt leave car just sat in car and admired the view for 10/15 mins.

 

i didnt buy a ticket as i thought I didnt need one as I wasnt leaving the car, only sitting in it.

 

Received a parking charge through the post, Ignored as friend said too....

 

Have just received 2nd one, which i ripped up.

 

I am becoming scared and regretting ignoring the letters.

 

Please, any advice?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi please find below requested information.

due to my stupidity of ignoring first letter i am now beyond the payment date of 20/4/18.

 

I felt i didnt have to pay a ticket as I never left the car, we sat and admired the view for 13 mins,

 

do i have a leg to stand on?

I'm not very well educated and I'm intimadated by the legal process

 

looks like I have to deal with this as I do not want a ccj.

I have mental health issues which causes me to avoid things can i use that?

 

Any help you knowledgable peeps can provide, is very very welcome.

 

1 Date of the infringement 31/03/18 12:33:56

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 5/4/18

 

3 Date received I think it was 8/4/18 I received the 2nd reminder letter 17/4/18

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] I don’t know

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes image of my car entering and leaving

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] no

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

 

7 Who is the parking company? Parking eye

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] lido carpark margate kent

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, BPA

please check HERE

 

it says they are a member of the BPA for q8

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

so EXACTLY how long were you in the car park? There is a minimum grace period of 10 minutes and being there less than 15 wil not be considered a parking event in most courts but we really want to knock it on the head before it gets that far

 

Is the place near to you so you canget down there and photograph the sigange and the ticket machine so we can see what the offer of a contact was.

 

using your mental health as a get out wont win a court case, it will lose it as this is about contracts, not parking or anything else.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother,

on the letter it says; Time in carpark; 0 hours 13 minutes

Yes it is close so I will be able to get photos.

The fact i didnt leave the car, does that have any bearing?

Thank you thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be ok then.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

It would be worth spending some time reading other threads. The following is just one I knew of. There may be more.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?476286-Parking-Eye-claimform-ANPR-PCN-Lido-car-park-Cliftonville-Kent-BB-on-Display&p=5013350&viewfull=1#post5013350

 

Parking Eye are members of the BPA so any appeal would first go to PE and when it is rejected (and it will) you can then go to POPLA which is a lot fairer that the IAS.

 

I don't think there are many signs there and the pay station is set back as well. I will have to look again on Google Streetview

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

This hasn't got anything to do with whether or not you left the vehicle. But the 13 minutes is absolutely crucial.

 

The BPA say in their T&C's (link below) that any grace period should be a MINIMUM of 10 minutes. Section 13.2. So is 13 minutes unreasonable?

 

I possibly don't agree that your mental health has nothing to do with this, and I'll explain why.

 

 

If you are considered disabled, and it matters not whether or not you have a blue badge. Reasonable adjustments must be made to allow you extra time. Whether this is time to park and do some shopping, or time to park, read, understand and decide on whether or not you agree with the signage at the car park.

 

This is covered in the BPA Terms & Conditions for their Members of which ParkingLie is one, at section 16 of this document.

 

Whilst section 16 is written with the physically disabled in mind, under the equalities act, they must also make reasonable adjustments for anyone else that is considered disabled in any way, and as I've said, that would include extra time to read and understand the signage.

 

So where a 10 minute 'grace period' may be considered reasonable for most motorists. 13 minutes may not be unreasonable for others.

 

 

It's just another possible prong of attack for an appeal to ParkingLie (in the first instance).

 

 

 

Do you have any of the paperwork from ParkingLie that you can upload after removing any personal details, reference numbers and vehicle registration?

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you piece it together on a scanner bed and scanit

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked on streetview but the Lido signs are from 2014 when a different company ran the car park.

 

As well as DF's excellent response, it may be worth checking with the local council to see if PE have actually applied for planning permission for the signs.

 

Whatever you do with PE, never mention the drivers name, only state 'The Driver'

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, I need to write to them appealing this charge?

 

Yes, but not yet. ParkingLie (as with most others) give you 28 days to appeal, so there's time enough to wait and gather some more opinions on what that appeal should contain.

 

Don't rush in to it blind :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as already said no hurry to respond to them so get some pictures of the entrance to the car park, any signage at said entrance and any different signs that may be scattered about.

 

Also get clear pictures of the terms and conditions on the payment machinery as this is when a contract is actually agreed, when you put the money in you have accepted what is offered. Up to that point there is always room for argument.

 

DF's observations about the Equalities Act are valid, my point was that telling a court about your mental condition or saying you are not very well educated may get you sympathy

 

the law applies equally to all so you need to try and get a positive outcome before that stage because if that is your only argument then you wont win.

 

We will try and find flaws with the areas that are dealt with in private parking and that will include

how easy it is to spot their signs,

how easy they are to understand,

are they a valid offer and

whether the claim is for a breach of contract or for monies due as a contractual sum.

 

the first 3 bits mean we need to see the signs and associated terms on the machine but they must also have the right to offer you a contract and that means whether they have the correct permissions or not.

 

parking co's are known to lie about such things

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for delay I am working this weekend.

I have taken pictures but having trouble uploading, I will spend more time when i finish work this evening.

Thanks again for everyones time, I dont feel so scared.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the first image from around the pay machine? On the streetview (from the road) the images are updated to show the pay machine in place but I couldn't see any signs nearby. The terms and conditions in tiny writing is virtually unreadable and I cannot see a UK address at all. A PO box number is insufficient.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to start thinking about the appeal as time is running out. This can be as simple as stating that 'the driver' has a minimum of 10 minutes to read, understand and then decide to stay or go as stated in the BPA code of practice. Three extra minutes would not be a strict breach as the driver needed to find a space, park and then go to the machine and read the instructions bearing in mind that the signs are not that clear and had to spend extra time reading the small print to ensure that you knew what was what.

 

Others will have a better idea then me so hang on a while till the others arrive. I wouldn't mention the mental health issues as yet.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting,

the sign at the entrance is not a contract but an "invitation to treat so you can then accept or reject the contract offered. you only accpet it when you feed the meter, which you didnt so no contract accepted.

 

secondly,

the sign with the tariffs on says that you must park within the lines and dont park on the yellow lines. If you disobey you will be clobbered for £100. Nothing in that that says you must pay to remain there so according to their sign you havent done anything to attract a demand for £100 The small print is immaterial as it doesnt form part of the core contract.

 

The only thing to consider is whetehr the tariff table is construed as to be the same as the "donts" terms.

 

the sign should start off by saying you have to agree to pay or you are in breach and then have the bit about not parking on yellow lines.

 

They are currently separate and as the sign facing the road damages PE chances od a claim they should ahve got this right.

 

So, what to write to them.

I would start off with a damning of their signage being an invitation to treat and the fact that the contract is only formed when money is accepted by the payment machine.

 

As the driver didnt put any money in the contract was never formed so there can be no breach.

 

Secondly as the sigange at the site contains 3 different sets of text it takes more than 10 minutes to go round and read it all and then decide if one wants to be bound by it and having decided it wasnt agreeable, leave.

 

This is covered by the BPA code of Practice which set a MINIMUM grace period and this 10 minutes is that, a minimum not a maximum.

 

thirdly the wording on the sign stating the tariffs contain text so small they are unreadable and laid out in a way that is impossible to be considerd a fair contract under S62 of the Consumer Rights Act and thus no contractual obligation is enforceable.

 

Lastly the wording on the signage is identical to the case of Parking Eye v Cargius and so the amount claimed is designed to deter and is an unenforceable penalty.

 

get this off to them pronto.

they may well huff an puff but i would bet that they wont go further than farmed out threatograms or they risk losing big money.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...