Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Diamond car insurance not updated policy, unknowingly driving without insurance for 4 months!


elelephant
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I am posting here for some advice.

 

I have insured my car with Diamond for over a year.

In August, I bought a new car and contacted Diamond to update my policy.

The staff member I spoke to advised me that he had temporarily changed my then current policy (which was coming to an end) to my new car, and started a new policy which he said would insure my new car from September and reassured me that I would not have to do anything else.

I paid £100 upfront for this and have been paying £60 monthly since.

 

Last week, I received a letter in the post from the MID stating that my car was not registered as insured.

Puzzled, I phoned Diamond and explained the situation,

it turns out that the new policy was still registered for my old car,

and that my new car had in fact been uninsured the whole time!

 

I was very shocked and surprised and expressed this to the salesperson,

who told me it would be a £20 admin fee to change the policy over to my new car!

Which it was supposed to be changed to all along!

I absolutely refused to pay this, and he did then remove the charge.

 

Where do I stand with this?

Am I liable to be reimbursed for any of the money that I paid towards insurance for a car which had been scrapped in August?

Or does the duty lie with me to further check the documents?

 

I specifically remember the salesperson reassuring me that I didn't need to do anything extra for my policy.

I had received one email on 19th August stating that my policy had been updated to my new car,

so hadn't looked any further,

although the salesperson from Diamond (when I spoke to them yesterday) said there was no record of my call to them on that day.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

El

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly the insurer has acted very negligently here. I think the big question for you is whether you are going to be put to any problems as a result of this. For instance, are you likely to be prosecuted for no insurance?

 

On the basis that you have been paying the correct premiums for the insurance on your new car – then I don't think that there is anything to claim back. However, I think you need to make sure that there is no suggestion anywhere on any database that you have had an uninsured vehicle and that you have been driving it uninsured.

 

If there is some suggestion that there may be trouble because of apparently driving an insured then this needs to be dealt with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What should have happened is that the customer service agent you spoke to should have undertaken two separate admin tasks.

 

1) update the current policy year with the change of car.

2) update the policy with the change of car from the renewal date, advising you of the revised renewal premium. Unfortunately Insurances go into renewal mode about 5 weeks ahead of the renewal date and the renewal on your old car had already been produced. When they updated the current policy year, it would not have updated the renewal that had already been produced. Hence why two seperate tasks are required.

 

Insurers are allowed to backdate Insurance in these situations where they have made a mistake, to correct their error. But they must get a manager to authorise this and sometimes IT have to enable it depending on the system they use. Most Insurers say they can never backdate, but that is not true. They can correct errors.

 

Suggest a complaint is made with some force and insist this is corrected.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...