Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Park Watch ANPR PCN - One Stop Shopping Centre Perry Barr Birmingham


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2331 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I would be grateful for some advice from you guys regarding an on-going matter I have with a company called Park Watch.

 

I was using the car park at the One Stop Shopping Centre in Perry Barr Birmingham and dropped someone off in an area which the company claimed was for busses only.

 

They then wrote to me and issued me with a Parking Charge.

I was going to pay it until I decided to Google the company and found that someone else (markavfc) had had the same experience and with your guys help had had the fine rescinded.

 

Following his lead, I wrote to Park Watch saying that I would not be paying the fine along the following lines:

 

With reference to your recent letter reference number ,,,,,,.

As the keeper I will not be paying this so called charge as there is no contractual obligation and you have not complied with schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

 

I heard nothing from them for 3 weeks and then I received another letter claiming that I hadn't responded to their first.

I think this was due to them changing addresses but with companies like that it might have just been another tactic.

 

Therefore I responded again with the following:

Dear Sir or Madam:

 

Parking Charge Notice .....

 

I received a letter from you dated 28th June 2017 pertaining to the above matter.

The address I was given to write back to you was given as:

 

Park Watch, Payments Department

Suite 12, The Shippon

Church Road

Dodleston

Chester

CH4 9NG

 

I wrote back to this address on the 8th July accordingly. A copy of the letter is attached for your convenience.

 

I received a letter dated 27th July indicating that the parking charge is overdue.

 

However I did not receive a response to my original letter and I await one at your earliest convenience.

 

Please note as stated originally, as the keeper I will not be paying this so called charge as there is no contractual obligation and you have not complied with schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

 

I have today received a very odd response from them which I will attach and would welcome your advice on how best to respond.

I look forward to hearing from you

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a fine. its a speculative invoice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. we need dates first of all. never mind the numerous mistakes theyve already made that can get rid of this.

 

What dates did the alleged infractions occur. What dates did you recieve the NTK.

 

Were these ANPR captures, or did you get a ticket on your vehicle.

 

The dates are important as they must adhere to a strict timeframe.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the post, please see responses below:

ok. we need dates first of all. never mind the numerous mistakes theyve already made that can get rid of this.

 

What dates did the alleged infractions occur. 20th June 2017 What dates did you recieve the NTK. 28th June letter was sent. I received it on 1st July or thereabouts

 

Were these ANPR captures, or did you get a ticket on your vehicle. I was sent captures which are shown in my attached letter[/B]

 

The dates are important as they must adhere to a strict timeframe.

Edited by Wrighteous
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you havent appealed and they are telling you this.

They are doing so because that way they can claim that the protocols havent been followed by you and they dont have to consider anything or give you a POPLA code.

 

The thrust of the argument Mark was given was that the signage isnt a contract but one that is prohibitive in nature this menas that ther can be no "performance" by the parking co ( they cant actually offer you anything as a consideration- ie) park here and pay us £90) and since they dont own the land they have to interest in trespass or disobdience.

 

Mark is also a fellow Villa fan so if you support Birmingham City you will be on your own!

Mind you that is normal for St Andrews.

Lonliest job in the world? cleaner at City trophy room.

 

Back to business,

as you have read his thread you will realise that it is a long haul,

not a short hop so advice is wait and see what they send out next rather than be in a rush to waste a tree writing letters that get ignored.

 

 

Ultimately you will be telling them there is no contract and they know it and yoi know thay have been here before and they will be throwing good money after bad in a pointless pursuit if they continue but let them get to a point where they are forced to accept that you arent going to play nicely first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ericsbrother and apologies for the delay in responding. I have been away on holiday and just got back to another letter now from a Debt Recovery company with the 'fine' now totally £160 plus the addition of a couple of threats. I would be very grateful for your advice.

 

Btw, my family home is a stone's throw away from the Villa and I used to deliver newspapers to the football club. Do I qualify?

Debt Recovery letter 15 Aug page 1 pdf.pdf

Edited by stu007
Removal of Personal Details
Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore any powerless dca

they are NOT BAILIFFS

 

 

link in post 6 still needs doing please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responses to the link are shown below:

 

For PNC's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 20th June 2017

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 28th June 2017

 

3 Date received 1st July

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] N

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up you appeal] No

I have written to them with the following:

With reference to your recent letter reference number .....

As the keeper I will not be paying this so called charge as there is no contractual obligation and you have not complied with schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

 

 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No

they did not acknowledge this and sent another letter on 27th July saying the payment was overdue. I followed this up with another letter:

I received a letter from you dated 28th June 2017 pertaining to the above matter.

 

 

The address I was given to write back to you was given as:

 

Park Watch, Payments Department

Suite 12, The Shippon

Church Road

Dodleston

Chester

CH4 9NG

 

I wrote back to this address on the 8th July accordingly.

 

 

A copy of the letter is attached for your convenience.

 

I received a letter dated 27th July indicating that the parking charge is overdue. However I did not receive a response to my original letter and I await one at your earliest convenience.

 

Please note as stated originally, as the keeper I will not be paying this so called charge as there is no contractual obligation and you have not complied with schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.

 

 

7 Who is the parking company? Park Watch (but according the letter from Debt Recovery Plus it is actually Defence Systems Limited

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] One Stop Car Park, Perry Barr, Birmingham

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. British Parking Association, I think

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

I have received another letter from Debt Recovery Plus who are basically threatening me to pay the fine and have quoted a hearing from the Supreme Court to help persuade me. Please note that all letters have been attached in this thread already

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS said on all threads in any forum section,

you ignore dca's as they have no powers or rights at all.

 

 

Ask yourself why the sum has gone up to £160?

Did you sign a credit agreement with them? No, so they cant lawfullly demand any more than the contracted fee, assuming the debt was real in the first place.

 

 

They rely on people being ignorant on the difference between bailiffs and debt collectors. DR+ are the parking indstry pet rentathreats and can be iognored totally.

 

Keep letting them waste their money.

If you get a letter from BWlegal or Gladstones soliciotors come back here as you will need to respond but up until that point the letters are harmless.

EB (from Handsworth)

 

Thanks ericsbrother and apologies for the delay in responding. I have been away on holiday and just got back to another letter now from a Debt Recovery company with the 'fine' now totally £160 plus the addition of a couple of threats. I would be very grateful for your advice.

 

Btw, my family home is a stone's throw away from the Villa and I used to deliver newspapers to the football club. Do I qualify?

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, nothing so far but I will keep you posted!

 

I can't see anything, Wrighteous.

 

HB

 

Here you go, it wouldn't attach for some reason previously

 

 

Wayne

Debt Recovery letter 15 Aug page 1 pdf.pdf

Edited by stu007
Removal of Personal Details
Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical c**p from these drips.

stating that if you don't respond to their bumf they will take that to mean you are not contesting that you were the driver.

What planet are they on?

 

The last ones to decide who would be the driver is a bunch of no hopers like DRP who are not even regulated.

 

And the Beavis case doesn't apply in your situation either but these numpties keep using it regardless of how appropriate it is.

 

Do they really think that people are stupid enough to pay them £160

 

funny how with all the advice they give on these letters they fail to mention how to report them to the FCA for breach of debt collection guidelines

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yep. Nowt they can do. They also refer to the beavis case which has nothing to do with your circumstances. basically its a silly form letter designed to scare you.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I can instruct my dog to sit

IF it does is a totally diff matter

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they were serious about all of this they would explain where the sum of £160 comes from.

 

 

As it is just an amount they have generated believing that being less then £200 most people will pay it

then that, along with the fact they arent registered with the FCA as licenced deposit takers should tell you the merits of their letter.

 

In short all dca's are rentathreats and can do nothing themselves other than make a noise and send scary letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

They haven't done anything of the sort

Post 9 refers

 

Why are you SO scared of DCA's ????

Not being fleeced by a DCA on consumer debt are you?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are saying that of you dont pay their clients their clients may well do something that has nothing to do with them and then list a load of scary things that arent actually how the world works.

 

There is also that word, IF.

IF they do this or that,

IF they win etc.

 

Zenith arent going to write to you and tell you that if you dont pay up their client may well lose money over this so please feel sorry for them and pay up beacuse they have a number of cute fluffy animals to look after and they would all be taken into care if you dont pay.

 

The next letter wont threaten to harm those cute fluffy animals because you are a meany either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...