Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So if the breach occurred say Dec 2017 (first missed payment) and the default notice was issued Sept 2018 and the claim was issued 7th June 24 the claimant will of course be arguing it is within the limitation period (by 3 months)
    • Yep, I would  have brought up the other things like asking for their contract and receiving no response etc. but the mediation phone calls were rather short. Evri just said the contract was not with them (i said 1999 act response etc.) and the goodwill offer thing. Whole process took about 10 minutes in total. Seems like they don't even want to negotate in mediations anymore. "they're only given a certain amount that they can agree to in mediation per day" I mean its hard for me to say if thats the mediator paraphrasing or aa direct quote from evri I will look through that thread and share what I find, also for what its worth I also have everything I made for the previous claim WS and bundles etc. that I can tweak for this parcel, since it did go almost all the way to court and is a virtually identical case. that + this new stuff you shared above should be helpful to me
    • If I haven't referred to it before then please check out this thread another case where the claimant contracted directly with Packlink for a courier delivery service carried out by Evri. Please read this thread very carefully and eventually you will get to a point where the claimant – our OP – discovered some interesting terms and conditions and has referred to them in his case. He incorporated these into his witness statement and was given judgement – not on the basis of rights of third parties but on the basis of direct responsibility. I would suggest that use the witness statement as a model although we will want to see it before you file it off. When you find the particular post with the witness statement, please can you post a link to it here as well as a copy of the witness statement because I don't have the time to look for it at the moment and the thread is rather long. However it is very important to you and you should go through it very carefully indeed. We have applied for a transcript of the judgement and hopefully it will be along in six weeks or so. As soon as we receive it we will make it available on this sub- forum.
    • Yes they are criminal charges. The law requires you to stop/report if "...owing to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place an accident occurs by which— [injury or damage to a third party or their property is caused]. "I would be disinclined at this stage to offer anything more than you do not believe any such accident took place.  You could provide a brief description of the altercation in an attempt to explain why another party might be making these allegations. I know it's a silly question, but are you sure that you did not collide with anything? Could you have mistaken hitting something for the other party thumping your car? Could it be that you passing closely caused him to damage something somehow?  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'll try and explain this as best I can,

 

last December (a week before Christmas to be exact) we had a visit from 2 high court enforcement officers (their ID was on a laminated card)

 

they said they were from court enforcement services and were acting on behalf of NPOWER for an unpaid ccj that has been transferred up to the high court and they were here to take payment or sieze goods which I think they said was to the value of £2563 - odd,

 

( we said you can see we don't have goods to that value anyway and they agreed)

 

at no point was any paperwork produced to break down any of the companies fee's or anything or any high court writ produced.

 

Now as it was Christmas and my husband was a bit panicked that these people had turned up and put him on the spot

 

he told the officer he'd pay £150 a month on a certain date

(which is completely not do-able in our circumstances with 5 children and myself not working and he shouldn't of offered to pay that amount in the first place),

 

with that the officer said ok i'll text you the agreement when I'm outside in my car and let you know the account details and remind you of date to pay etc and it was exactly that a written text saying

reference number -

Automated line (number)

account number:

sort code:

total amount £2563

instalments on .... every month

 

I was upstairs keeping the children away at this point and came down to find he'd offered to pay £150 every month,

 

I asked if there was any paperwork or anything which there wasn't.

 

he paid £150 for 2 months,

we're currently paying off a fair few debts and it put us under so much strain we could barely pay the rent!

 

we researched a few things online and got mixed messages about high court writs ,

this company in particular what powers they had exactly ,

 

my husband rang the company up explained what had happened and said we'd paid 2 months but we have no paperwork to see where the money's actually gone,

 

no evidence of a high court writ,

no paperwork to say if any fee's are to be added

literally nothing but a bank account + sort code!

 

they told my husband they would email it over,

twice he made this phone call and twice told the same thing with NO EMAIL actually arriving.

 

I decided we'd stop paying as we could be paying anyone without any paperwork.

January was our last payment

 

yesterday they decided to turn up again

(I know with high court they don't let you know they are coming anyway)

 

when we asked for some sort of paperwork to prove this writ existed one of them pulled up a picture on their phone and zoomed in on a stamp they say is from the high court and said this is your writ and there is the stamp.

 

One officer in particular was really agitated when we kept questioning why we had no paperwork to prove where the payments were going,

 

saying they don't need to provide paperwork we are just to pay it as it's an order from the high court ,

 

he told my husband to be quiet whilst HE spoke

(now my husband is as polite as you get so wasn't being rude or anything)

 

but we were promptly spoke over when we were explaining what we wanted to know.

 

They said we are lucky they haven't charged us for this visit or the first one as they have come from London to the south west .

 

Also mentioned was the fact if we didn't pay Npower could apply to make my husband bankrupt.

 

whilst i've spent most of my night researching various options to stop these people coming back as i'm not paying without any paperwork with breakdown of fee's etc

 

we'd really appreciate any advice or pointing in the right direction of what to do next and how to handle the situation.

 

my husband is ringing the county court this afternoon to double check the status ,

 

do we also ring NPOWERS legal dept and see what they've got to say (again the officers said to ring them too)

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have failed to start at the beginning,

 

you have said nothing about the debt to Npower or the county court claim they filed against you,

nor what you have done after receiving the judgement.

 

Bailiffs dont just turn up seize good either,

they have to go through certain steps

(they sometimes forget to tell people this as you have now experienced) and there are fixed charges for this regardless of where they come from so their travel is nothing to do with that.

 

start at the beginning and people will offer more relevant advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your reply,

without my husband here (at work) it's difficult to fill in the gaps,

 

I know he had a long standing dispute with Npower as we had a lot of problems with them when we first moved in (3 years ago)

 

I know he'd received various letters asking for payment from npower themselves and paid vary little.

 

I believe he didn't defend against the ccj being made when the paperwork came through the post and since i haven't seen any judgement paperwork ordering payment,

 

if it has come through obviously to get to this stage it's been ignored and un paid :

( , sorry if that's sketchy but i myself am unsure of exact details/ the ins + outs. perhaps it might be better to get him to pop on this post and fill in the gaps when he's home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You sure they were HCEO??

Very rare for npower to switch courts and use hceo's

 

Are you sure the claimant on the CCJ was npower not a dca debt buyer??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to short circuit a few posts above.

 

nPower do use HCEOs as have dealt with a few now.

 

As for what happened- the bill(s) have gone unpaid and as you say above if he did not defend the CCJ they will have gained a CCJ by Default.

 

No payment being made then nPower will have transferred the debt for enforcement through the High Court and that is why the visit has been made initially.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks PT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before CES visited you there should have been a letter entitled Notice of Enforcement giving you a specific date in which to pay in full or negotiate payment proposals. Did you receive this? If not are you sure your OH hasn't just buried it somewhere.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

to be honest I see a few debt letters come through my door,

have a few ccjs already (both of us)

 

 

it's entirely possible it's been opened and put aside/in a draw or binned.

 

 

I guess we must of received this before the first visit or they wouldn't of turned up?

 

Is it right we can apply for something through the court to stop these turning up and pay directly?

 

 

Should we have s copy of any paperwork for payments already made?

 

What I'm personally not keen on doing is continuing to pay money into an account and have no record of payments made or what charges are being/have been added.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if you can't pay you can make an application to the court

 

https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/factsheets/Pages/highcourtenforcement/highcourtbailiffs.aspx

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

N244 to set it aside

n245 to vary the judgement

both are in our library. legal section.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...