Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/restons claimform - old LLoyds OD debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help please.

I have received a CCJ claim pack from Rentons solicitors in regards to a apparant debt linked to a overdraft I have no knowledge of. I have answered the default questions below. Can someone please offer advice / assistance on what I should do now please. I have completed the Acknowledgment of service on the money claim website so the clock is ticking now.

 

Please help :-)

 

Name of the Claimant ? - Restons / Arrow Global re: Lloyds bank overdraft

 

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.

 

Date of issue : 04/04/2017

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? - The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Lloyds TSB dated on or about Dec 30 1994 and assigned to the Claimant on Nov 20 2013

 

PARTICULARS a/c no xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

DATE 10/02/2017

ITEM - Default Balance

VALUE - 4500

Post Refrl Cr - NIL

 

TOTAL - 4500

What is the value of the claim?

£4500

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? - Appears to be a overdraft for a account I have not used since 2011.

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?

Yes - appears to be Dec 30 1994

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

 

Appears to be debt purchaser - Arrow Global Limited.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

No - I have not received any documentation in regards to the debt - didn't know it existed before receiving the CCJ claim pack as I was working out of the country since February 2011

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

No - Left the country in 2011 so have received no communication from Lloys of anyone in regards to this debt.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - As above - Nothing received.

 

Why did you cease payments? - Left the country - left account open but was completely unaware of any outstanding overdraft.

 

What was the date of your last payment? - Nothing paid into account or account even used since Feb 2011

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No dispute.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan - No communication at all ever had.

 

What you need to do now.

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement

(except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts) -

 

This appears to be for a overdraft - shall I still send CCA ?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice guidance given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Site team will move to financial legal part of site.

 

Are you currently residing in the UK ?

 

Have you contacted Lloyds to get hold of statements ? If not you should do, as you need to know when last payment was made, why the debt is so much. It might be all interest and charges, with the correct debt amount being a lot less.

 

Suggest an urgent call to Lloyds to start getting hold of statements.

 

CCA might not be relevant.

 

But send CPR 31:14 letter to Restons asking for all documents mentioned in their particulars of claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi UncleBulgaria - Thanks for immediate advice.

 

 

Yes I am now back living in the UK albeit in a differen't part and nothing linked to the old address so no Idea why this has come back to haunt me.

 

 

I haven't contacted Lloyds yet as was worried about what else might happen without some proper advice first.

 

 

I know I left the UK on February 3rd 2011 and know for certain I didn't make any payments after this date to any Lloyds account.

 

 

If this is all interest and charges, will these possibly be reduced if Lloyds sends me the statements ?

 

Drafting the CPR 31:14 now and will send this afternoon

- Do I need to include any fee to get this processed at this stage ?,

 

 

Does it have any bearing on the clicking clock to the CCJ date

- sorry for the questions but I have never been in this position before so just ensuring I am not missing anything.

 

Many Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need copies of all statements from Lloyds to see what has happened. You might need to submit a subject access request and pick up all the statements from a local Lloyds branch. The quicker you get on to this, the better.

 

You might find that Lloyds failed to cancel a DD payment after you had instructed them. They have added excessive charges, by allowing the account to remain open for too long.

 

Did you advise Lloyds you were leaving the UK and gave then new contact details ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - I have just got off the phone to Lloyds recovery unit and they have confirmed that they have sold this 'overdraft debt' and also a unknown ' Loan' to Arrow Limited to recover the debt.

 

They stated that as this has been sold,

they have no statements or details of the account or loan as this has been passed to Arrow.

 

I will draft another CPR 31:14 to Restons / Arrow for details of the Loan they have now also mentioned as it's only a matter of time before this one gets escalated to CCJ claim aswell I presume.

 

Is there anything else I should do whilst I am waiting for Arrow to send these details back,

By all accounts it appears this is a valid debt in which case I will have to pay it

- Should I contact Arrow directly to start negotioations or wait till the paperwork is sent back.

 

If I contacted Arrow and agreed a payment plan, would this stop the impending CCJ action or is this a unstaoppable force now .. ?

 

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wish people would stop recommending sending an sar when someone gets a claimform its totally pointless and will never be through in time to give any useful information

 

when you phoned Lloyds did you ask last payment date on the OD?

 

if you haven't paid anything since feb 11 then this could well be statute barred

and the loan the same.

 

have you ack'd the claim on the NCOL website yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did the advice about SAR change ? Has always been to my knowledge just in case there is a hearing in say 3 months time. Yes it might not answer immediate questions on last date of payment.

 

Lloyds can't avoid requests for data made under the Data Protection Act, but they might try to avoid providing information not made under the DPA.

 

Of course CPR 31:14 might not be replied to until much later in the process and not help with a defence.

 

If this debt includes a loan and overdraft which have been added together, then i would suggest a CCA request to Arrows.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update

- Having received some advice from the Citizens advice and having only today to input my defence,

 

I have entered a defence that this is a unknown and non acknowledged debt and even if this did exist, It would now be statute barred.

 

Will update thread when I get a response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

for thread ref and the guys helping you here, what defence did you submit, verbatim (minus any identifiables)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This'll be good..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much of the claim do you dispute?

 

I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.

 

Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it?

 

No, for other reasons.

 

Defence

 

I Acknoledge no debt to Lloyds TSB.

I have had no contact with Lloyds TSB since January 2011.

If there was any debt, It would now be statute barred by the statute of limitations act 1980 Section 5

“an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

The reason I know I have had no contact is that I left the country to work abroad on the 1st February 2011 and have had no contact with anyone in regards to any alledged debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

should kill it dead then..

 

 

they have 33 days to do

'something'

 

 

which I bet will be the std rectums willy waving letter regarding how special they are and can totally ignore a CPR 31:14 request because they already magically know its allocated to the small claims track

and the judge is their mate and will agree they don't need any paperwork at all to prove their claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All - I have now received a response from Restons and would appreciate any advice on what I should do next. The letter received is as follows :

 

Dear Sir,

We note you have recently filed a defence to the court proceedings issued against you, whereby you state that previously left the country, have had no contact with Lloyds TSB since that time and therefore do admit any debt is owing to said company.

 

By way of explanation, Arrow global limited is a debt purchaser. We would advise that this is a simple debt recovvery action and the relevant facts are as follows:

 

1. The outstanding balance referred to in the particulars of claim refers to a banking facilitywith account number xxxxxxxxx. Our clients records indicate that the account was opened on or about the 30/12/1994.

 

2.Lloyds TSB should have sent statements of accounts to you on a monthly basis during the lifetime of the account. Such statements will have identified any payments made into and out of the account , as well as detailing the application of any contractual interest/charges and the outstanding balance;

 

3. You failed to maintain your account in line with the terms and conditions and accordingly, Lloyds TSB terminated the account;

 

4. In line witht he terms and conditions of the account, the original creditor had the contractual right of assignment. In other words, Lloyds TSB was entitled to transfer their rights and benefits under the account to a third party and that right was excercised on 20/11/2013. Around the time of the assignment you should have received a letter from the original creditor advising you that the account had been assigned to a third party and you should also have received a notice of assignment from arrow global global limited.

 

In view of point 4 above and the monies outstanding in respect of your account are no longer owing to Lloyds TSB as said company relinquished its interest in respect of your account and the balance outstanding whenit assigned your account to the claimant. Furthermore, we fail to understand the logic behind your assertion that you deny the debt due to having received no contact from Lloyds TSB since you left the country. On that basis it would surely be expected that said company would not have been in the position to contact you, as you were no longer in the country/ residing at the address held on their file. In respect of this point , we note that you do not claim to have communicated this issue to the original creditor, nor do you claim that your account was settled before you left.

 

Finally, although you allege that the claim is statute barred, we note that you have provided no information / evidence of when you believe the limitation period commenced, nor have you provided any details of when you believe you made a payment towards the debt or when you last acknowledged your liability for the debt. Please note that merely claiming not to have received any contact for a period of 6 years or more, which as covered above was down to actions of you, does not render a debt statute barred. The information provided to this firm is that your account was not terminated until 2012 which means the cause of action in respect of this account accrued within 6 years prior to legal proceedings commencing and in itself would confirm that the debt is not statute barred. Furthermore, given the nature of the account which is the subject of these proceedings and as it does not apprear that said account was closed before you left the UK, it is sensible to assume that credits continued to be made to the account in your absence and again, this would mean the debt is not statute barred.

 

In view of the information set out in this letter, we do not believe your defence has any real prospect of success and we will therefore recomend to our client that a application be made to strike out the Defence and to enter a judgement against you for the full amount claimed, together with legal fees and costs. Should you wish to avoid these furtherr costs being incurred then we invite you to withdraw your defence by completing the enclosed Form N9A and returning it to this office within 14 days.

 

We await your response.

 

So what should I do no, they haven't provided and details about the account, debt, when last payment was made etc ( I know this was at least in January 2011). Any advice / guidance is gratefully received.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not for you to provide any evidence at this stage...its their claim its for them to prove its not statute barred...which they must do when it gets to that particular part of the process.

 

Fishing exercise for you to provide them with information as they dont have a clue what the history is or the debt in reality

 

Ignore.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

typically restons letter...

sent to intimidate and unsettle

 

 

ignore

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing...unless the claimant wishes to proceed on a statute barred claim.....if they do you will receive a Directions Questionnaire N180...until and if forget about it.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi - Just wanted to update everyone.

 

I followed exactly what I was advised below and as stated, I have heard nothing since.

 

It's now been a couple of months - no letters, no more threats etc - What a relief.

 

As you are all no doubt aware,

this is very stressfull and I had many a missed nights sleep with worry but hoping thats now gone for good.

 

I just wanted to say a BIG thanks to everyone that took the time and energy to advise and assist

- Your all stars

 

Thanks Again

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets hope it is then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
lets hope it is then...

 

All,

Unfortunately an update from Restons again

- they have just sent another letter saying they are sending the court a 'application notice and supporting evidence asking the court to deal with the application without a hearing as they do not consider a hearing neccesary.

 

Once this has been referred to a judge, he/she will then either make a judgement or consider if a hearing is necessary. Either way I should receive a order fromt he court in due course which confirms the decision made.

 

Can I please ask what I should do now

- Is this just Restons still flexing their muscles or do I need to anything to counter this application to the court ?

 

As always, you continued help on this matter is gratefully received.

 

Kind Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application to lift the stay ? or lift the stay and strike out your defence / summary judgment...what order do they ask for on the N244?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...