Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, dx. Yes, I may need to turn my attention into some other things.
    • no they wont  can you PLEASE stop panicking about a nothing burger   dx  
    • Where a person who owns or partially owns a property enters into an IVA, it's usual practice that in the fifth year, the person has to attempt to re-mortgage the property to release equity. It's extremely rare that a homeowner will be successful in re-mortgaging due to having a poor credit rating. Where the owner is unable to re-mortgage, the IVA is extended for a further year. This is absolutely normal practice in an IVA, and if your sister cancels payments to the IVA, the IVA is at risk of failing and she could be made bankrupt, therefore losing any equity she has in the property. 
    • Right. So I think it would be  good idea to give a brief description of the property, for example detached house, or flat or terraced. And some sort of identifier so we can distinguish from other properties you handle. An incomplete street address eg "No.14" would do so while preserving your privacy. Is the freehold title discrete for the property, or does it cover other leasehold properties? And a bit about your history, how current ownership came about. At one stage you said it used to be your family home, elsewhere you wrote that you'd bought the leasehold. Did those comments refer to this property? Did you acquire it on the open market, or from your family? Is this the house with the garages, where you own the freehold? Trying to understand whether there are underlying reasons that might account for problems with valuation, eligibility for finance, and the fact that neither you nor Lender found it possible to sell. Finally (for the moment) you refer to existing litigation. Does that relate to this property? If so it would be good to give a brief overview. Civil or criminal? What role do play .. claimant, defendant, appellant, respondent?  Charge, or cause of action. You don't want to go off on separate path that would better joined to the current proceedings. 
    • Can you confirm the client on the letter please? Is it The Original Energy Provider or PRAC Energy? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Pension


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2566 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I’m writing this on behalf of a friend who has recently gone his separate ways from a council-employed job of many years.

 

 

The last 36 years of that job he was paying into the “works” pension plan, and whatever he contributed, his employer, the council, paid the same (lately he was paying £120 a month).

 

 

He was planning to retire in six months, age 55, as this was when he could take payments from his pension.

 

 

However, the council decided to off hire him in advance

– not literally, but by telling him his job was no longer available and that he would have to do another (one that was wholly unsuited to him).

 

 

The “settlement agreement” was much less than what it would have been in six months, but more concerning to him is his upcoming monthly pension.

 

 

He says that the council’s solicitor told him that although once he hits 55 he will get regular payments on his pension, these will be based only on his contributions.

 

 

The contributions made by his employer, the council, will be null and void, despite their having matched his payments for years. Is this right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish

 

 

you mean superannuation

or more correct LGPS

 

 

he need to speak wit their pensions dept

 

 

could he be thinking that because he took a lesser job his final salary dictates his pension..thats not true.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying.

Yes, superannation/LGPS.

 

He says that after speaking with their solicitor

he spoke on the phone to two different people on two separate occasions in the relevant pension department,

 

both of whom confirmed he would get payments based only on his personal contributions.

 

(The pension aside, he also said that once he turned down the other role he was forced to sign some document that said he couldn't speak about that council, and that if he didn't sign it he wouldn't get a settlement.)

 

What should his next move be, please?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not a compromise agreement was it?

 

 

they cant just make 30yrs of their contributions vanish!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he takes his pension at 55 and he wasnt made redundant or ill-health retired then his pension will be actuarily reduced by quite a large amount.

 

 

His pension scheme is a final salary scheme so he will have 30 years qualifying contributions and that will pay out as a normal pension something like 36/60th of his final salary.

 

 

That may well be knocked back by something like 40% for taking it early.

His alternative is to wait until he is 60/65 and draw the pension as of right without any reduction.

 

It looks as though by not accpting a move in his work he has screwed himself, if he moved and stuck it out he could have gone with a better deal ie no actuarial reduction as he would be going at their request, not his.

 

As for the pension being based on his contributions

I think there is a misunderstanding as to what that means.

 

 

He should have been given a document that spells out exactly what he would receive if going at 55, 60 or any other age under various circumstances relevant to his position.

 

The last bit is a confidentiality clause, a normal thing for a settlement like this.

 

 

It does beg the question why he didnt take advice before chucking his job in?

Im sure the union would have negotiated a deal for him as it would be in their members interests even if he wasnt a member.

 

All too late for that but the pension bit need looking into.

The employers pension dept will provide the projections if asked and then he will know what option suits him best and he will understand what he has been offered better regarding how the contributionas are made up. his qualifying salary, etc.

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ericsbrother & dx100uk

 

He says he did approach his union.

 

They told him that even if he took the other unsuitable job and tried to retire once he was eligible for his pension at 55

- in what would have been six months

- he would still be left with the same compromise agreement.

 

They did say that they would help him get the best deal possible

"but then did nothing".

 

when the deadline for signing the compromise agreement arrived,

he says that since the union has reneged on their promise to help him get the best deal, and the council's solicitor telling him that not signing would leave him in a much worse position, he signed.

 

On your advise, he has now contacted the pensions department and they are sending him a written breakdown, which I will post. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the advice from the union was terrible and completely untrue.

 

However as he has done what he has done then the best he can hope for now is an understanding of what he is entitled to and at what date as there will undoubtedly be an actuarial reduction if he takes the money at 55.

 

He may be better off waiting for the pension and taking another job for 5 years if he can.

If not he can work in any job that isn't part of the same pension scheme and take the pension offered as well.

 

That will allow him to accrue more pension from the new job when he finally hangs his boots up for good

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don't understand why the councils 30yrs of lgps contributions can be wiped out

Something's not right here

 

I happened to hear from my LGPS lot

I asked them about this

They said rubbish by the govt law they cannot wipe that out

Its written in stone

 

And neither can a compromise agreement negate it

 

That's the whole point of the scheme!!

Joint accrual.

 

The only way would be if he previously opted out

And the money is now elsewhere

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wont have been, the person the OP is trying to help is clearly not understanding what has gone on and that is then passed on to us to try and work out for ourselves and that advice is then given back and the person cannot comprehend the advice because they have an image of something totally different in their mind.

 

Hopefully when the pension calculation arrives it will become clearer but OP can you please take the paperwork from the person and put it up here exactly as it is written rather than posting up your friends interpretation of what it says..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...