Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Maintenance on public land behind my fence


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There should be a council team you can phone about this. They might have it recorded to contact you to replace the fence panels that have been damaged.

 

With my local council they are very quick in dealing with things. Send them an email and you get a response within a couple of days.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

well as I said in post 25. the council came and cleared basically the bit that I can see from my house, where the panels have been broken.

 

They wrote an e-mail to me to say

 

Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding to your email.

 

I am pleased to advise that our teams did visit the site on Wednesday 12th April to remove the rubbish and begin work on removing the brambles. Whilst we understand your disappointment, we believe that the fence at the rear of your property was already damaged prior to our work and this was not down to the pressure exerted by the ivy. Our team reported that the fence already seemed in need of repair and maintenance and our operatives were especially careful when removing the brambles and ivy, not to damage the fence further.

 

With this in mind, we do not accept the liability or responsibility for the replacement or maintenance of your fence. If you wish to pursue your claim then please contact our insurance section. For your convenience I have listed their contact details below

************

************

********

If you believe there is further work still to be completed, then I would be happy to visit the site with yourself at a convenient time to discuss what we can do and arrange any further work.

 

Thank you for contacting the Parks, Estates and Open Spaces team and if you have any further enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

...................................................................................................................................................

 

Now I have taken further pictures, the area is no-where near clear, and my previous pictures show that you can't even see the fence under all the ivy and bramble let alone get to them to do any maintenance!!

 

I have taken a picture of another panel which looks in good condition, as it didn't get attacked by weeds! so I don't the actual fence would have broken if it hadn't been destroyed by weeds, ivy and bramble! but how did they expect me to do any maintenance when I can't actually get access to it from both sides.

 

And I have gone to the land behind the fence and taken further pictures as the work is no where near completed, they seem to say it is in their e-mail.

 

I don't see how their " operatives" can sya it needed repair BEFORE they pulled off the weeds as you could not see the fence!

 

Any help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

with regard to how clear it is, that is basically what is needed under public liability rather than waht you might want to see.

The issue of the fence is tricky because it was always in your powers to prevent the damage being done but ironically that may have lead to you being prosecuted for criminal damage to their weeds.

They have invited you to contact their insurers so i would. get a quote for replacing the damged section and then say that normal deterioration would have meant the fence would last for another x years so the loss to you is (cost of fence) / years expected life x actual life. so for example. fence costs £400 and is due to last 20 years that works out at £20/year. actual life of fence 10 years so damage = £20x10= £200.

you need numbers to be rational and reasonable for a like for like replacement so no brass knobs or gold paint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok I see. but how they can say there was already damage is a joke - you couldn't even see the fence it was almost completely covered, so there would have been no way for me to do any kind of maintenance on it from that side!.

 

Also they have completely ignored my question about the access to my garage and neighbouring garages, it runs parallel with the public access road and the land from the public path has slipped and created a bulge so that you can't drive down this route to the garages. they haven't even mentioned it, they have effectively blocked mine and my neighbour access off to our own garages - what Can I do about that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the you know what to do. You lay it all out before them in a letter with photographs and tell them what you expect (difficult on the shared access but as it affects you then you can take the lead on this), how much it will cost if you get the work done and invite them to make as ite visit as a precursor to a remedy. Give them a limite amount of time to respond otherwise you may take legal action to recover the costs of remediation. This may well mean you have to shell out to do the work first yourself but give them the opportunity to do something. Get a quote before you write so you both know what the amount is likely to be

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...