Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all,        I really need to start my own thread on this Claim with Overdales/Lowell for a Cap One debt. but have already got to this stage .. My initial question for the moment - until replies come in - is that I figure my main stance is that a purchased debt cannot be claimed, debts can only be claimed by the original issuer of the debt .. but mediation is about coming to an agreement. So would I be acting in bad faith if I enter into mediation yet not seeking to come to a financial agreement? Also, I need to reject the scheduled time slot and ask for another as I'm not going to be free during those hours. The wording of the email gives the impression that I am given this one slot and if I reject it, then I am rejecting mediation - there is no mention of rescheduling, only of freeing up the slot for others .. although, I would have thought it would say so, if there were no possibility to reschedule.. Can I ask for another date without issue?   Anyway, if it's more helpful, I am happy to post up my defence and start a proper thread? I had a lot on at the time and had to do things right away due to the time limits, so didn't feel I had time to come here and go back and forth for info, so put my defence together from reading through relevant threads, late at night. CCA request appears to have been fulfilled (I'm still to check the accuracy of the documents). The other thing, asking solicitors about the particulars of the claim, hasn't .. although I forgot to ask for proof of postage and didn't send recorded post either (whereas the CCA I did), so not sure if I can pursue that easily ..?  
    • There is a plea guilty website...   Screenshot 2024-05-22 144200.pdf
    • Looking for a bit of assistance. I moved into a rented flat on 20th April 2024. I viewed it on the 14th April. Before I moved into the flat, the letting agency provided me with an offer sheet, in said offer sheet I made a number of requests and conditions related to me progressing with assuming the tenancy. These were: 1. A professional clean of the flat prior to move in date. 2. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet be replaced prior to move in date. These were all planned actions by the landlord when I viewed it. I could see the boxes for the hob and other items in the flat. I prepared to move in on the 20th April but none of the work mentioned in the offer sheet had been completed. The standard of the clean was abysmal - mouldy food left in the fridge, nothing wiped down, bathroom mouldy etc. The hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were also not installed. I decided to not officially move into the flat as it was not in a condition as promised, my partner lives relatively close by so I lived with her initially. It was only on the 24th April that the hob, shower glass and bathroom cabinet were installed. The cleaners visited again 2 weeks after move in date (3rd April) and attempted another clean of the flat. Again, it was a poor job. I resorted to cleaning the flat myself. I have numerous pictures of the things I identified during my clean and have sent this all to the letting agency. Because of the issues faced, I asked the letting agency that the rent be reduced for the initial month. Exactly halved - to represent the 2 weeks that I was not living at the property. The landlord and letting agency have responded by saying that they will be willing to accept 1 weeks rent as a deduction but not 2. My question is, am I in a strong position to insist on the 2 weeks rent returned or have I been fortunate that they have even offered a weeks rent as a deduction? I would like to insist on the 2 weeks. I have paid the 2 weeks only as my rent collection date passed 2 days ago. Thank you for any assistance. Any further relevant details required let me know and I will provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claim form - old H3G mobile debt - prob SBd***Claim Discontinued***


trullymadness
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I`m new here and need some good advise from you all.

 

I received yesterday a Court Claim form from Lowell solicitors.

 

They claim over £400 for Three mobile debt.

 

I was on contract from August 2010, last my monthly payment i made in Nov or Dec 2010 cos after i lost my job and cannot afford to pay.

 

I need some advise please how to and what to fill in this claim form?

 

I`m not very confident in law.

 

I read lots of posts there before posting but still not understand about CPR 31.14 request, response time, statute barred debt..

 

. I`m already fully stressed and anxious and at the moment feel like is no way out from this situation,

 

i cannot afford to pay to them as have only part time job and low income.

 

Thanks

:help:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

welcome aboard

to enable us to give the correct advise

please fill this out after you copy n past it here

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I Ltd

Date of issue 15/02/2017

 

What is the claim for –

 

1) The Defendant entered into an agreement with Three mobile under account reference XXXXXXX ("the Agreement")

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the service was terminated.

3) The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 23/12/2014 and notice given to the Defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £414.09 remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of £414.09

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.091, but limited to one year, being £33.13

c) Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £532.22 in total

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? mobile contract

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2010

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim? Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

 

Why did you cease payments? lost my job

 

What was the date of your last payment? Nov or Dec 2010

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

 

 

if you are 1000% confident the last payment was more than 6yrs before the date on the claimform

then the debt is statute barred and you can go back to MCOL and file the below now

 

that will kill the claim dead

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.

.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC] or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that the last payment you made was in 2010?

 

If so, then this will be SB, and they're out of time.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks dx100uk for you help and so quick response.:-D I`m very impressed. I try to do this tmw. Before i want to check my old paperwork to make sure it was one of those months. (actually i`m sure already, cos lost my only job that time and that made my worst Christmas ever).:mad2:

I will give you update tmw

Link to post
Share on other sites

they'll probably shout its not as the default was I bet registered sometime later

but if yor last payment was def say 6yrs + 3mts before then it IS

if you last payment wasn't but say just 1 or 2 mts over the yrs

 

 

it might be an idea to hold filing that defence for awhile till we nail things down by a CPR request

or you go ring H3G and ask.

 

 

but you should still ack [AOS] the claim online regardless

 

 

you'll see loads of Lowell mobile claims here most get discontinued.

 

 

like one today!

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?473004-Lowell-BW-Legal-claimform-Old-BT-Broadband-Debt***Claim-Discontinued***&p=4999352#post4999352

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning all. Done a deep search in my old shoe boxes full with old paperwork.

 

That is what i found -

a) my last DD was in October 2010, have two bills from 3 with outstanding balance of £49.92

b) a "Final Notice" letter from Wescot dated 01/08/2011 with same outstanding balance amount

c) a letter from 3 dated 14/01/2015 that i need to pay outstanding amount of £414.09 within 20 days. If i don`t pay from the date of letter then 3 debt purchasing partner called Lowell Portfolio I Ltd will contact to arrange payment directly with them

d) a letter from Lowell Financial dated 06/04/2016 with offer to pay 50% in next 15 days.

I was moving house couple of times and probably maybe some paperwork is missing (all the letters i found is from different addresses i lived, court claim is for current address)

The next steps i will do, gonna send them CPR request and fill the MCOL claim form online as advised from dx100uk

Is that right? Thanks again for help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great sb'd then

No need for CPR

Go file that defence

 

Game over for them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooooo you know DCAs hate defendants keeping old shoe boxes with all the information they dont have :madgrin:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha ha, brilliant news, well done, Lowlifes FAIL yet again!!!! Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant! :thumb:

 

Wait for the ''phantom'' payment claim they'll try and make, but when you point out they're attempting to commit fraud, it'll soon turn into an 'admin error'. Muppets.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you all for help. At least a bit less stress now:roll: I defend all claim online as advised by dk100uk :-D Maybe i should i send the same letter to the claimant Lowell Portfolio or to Lowell Solicitors (stated as address for documents and payments)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you all for help. At least a bit less stress now:roll: I defend all claim online as advised by dk100uk :-D Maybe i should i send the same letter to the claimant Lowell Portfolio or to Lowell Solicitors (stated as address for documents and payments)?

 

What letter :???:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest those threads are rather old.................

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning all:???:

 

A short update on my case with Lowell Portfolio.

 

On behalf of them Lowell Solicitors send me a copies of "directions questionnaire" they filled in court and asking me to do the same.

 

It states in letter that the court should send me same later on.

 

Is that means that I really need to go to court hearings? :?:

 

Is it something i can do now?

 

And actually I will need help with this questionnaire.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check with MCOL that they are proceeding....and if the court has issued directions questionnaires.

 

We have a had a few threads were this claimant is filling in DQs and sending them to defendants without informing the court.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The status on MCOL will change to " Transferred out Allocation " once both parties have submitted their DQs to the court....best to ring them though

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...