Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA appeal


bongorob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was awarded ESA support group in 2014. On November 21st 2016 I was interviewed by a Health Care Professional. This interview was postponed from May 2016 because someone had lost my file. On December 22nd 2016 a decision maker telephoned me to ask questions as the assessor had awarded 0 points and he was puzzled by her report.

 

during the interview he thanked me several times for providing more information and each time said "she didn't put that down."

 

When the interview was over he said that he would award me 15 points and that my benefit would carry on at the same rate until furthur notice.

 

On 24th Janaury I reveived a letter stating that I had been moved to the WRAG group on December 20th 2016.

 

On 25th January I phoned to request a mandatory reconsideration. I was told that someone from DWP would ring back later that day. No one did.

 

On 30th January I wrote asking for a reconsideration and also for copies of the evidence used to make the decision.

 

On 4th February I receieved a letter which said that DWP would not change the decision, including infomation that although they are aware of my previous record of mental health poblems that it was not taken into account because it was my condition on the day of the assessment which matters. They did not include copies of the requested evidence.

 

The letter also said that no new information had been received, I wasn't given the opportunity of providing any.

 

I intend to appeal but the letter does not contain the information as to how to do this despite the original letter to me saying that if a reconsideration did not result in a change, information about an appeal would besent to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was awarded ESA support group in 2014. On November 21st 2016 I was interviewed by a Health Care Professional. This interview was postponed from May 2016 because someone had lost my file. On December 22nd 2016 a decision maker telephoned me to ask questions as the assessor had awarded 0 points and he was puzzled by her report.

 

during the interview he thanked me several times for providing more information and each time said "she didn't put that down."

 

When the interview was over he said that he would award me 15 points and that my benefit would carry on at the same rate until furthur notice.

 

On 24th Janaury I reveived a letter stating that I had been moved to the WRAG group on December 20th 2016.

 

On 25th January I phoned to request a mandatory reconsideration. I was told that someone from DWP would ring back later that day. No one did.

 

On 30th January I wrote asking for a reconsideration and also for copies of the evidence used to make the decision.

 

On 4th February I receieved a letter which said that DWP would not change the decision, including infomation that although they are aware of my previous record of mental health poblems that it was not taken into account because it was my condition on the day of the assessment which matters. They did not include copies of the requested evidence.

 

The letter also said that no new information had been received, I wasn't given the opportunity of providing any.

 

I intend to appeal but the letter does not contain the information as to how to do this despite the original letter to me saying that if a reconsideration did not result in a change, information about an appeal would besent to me.

 

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have 2 copied of that decision notice called a Mandatory Reconsideration.

 

You have 1 month from the date on that letter to lodge an appeal. Whilst doing that you will still be paid the WRAG amount.

 

Download, fill in and then print off (keep a copy for yourself) the SSCS1 form from here https://www.gov.uk/social-security-child-support-tribunal/appeal-tribunal

 

Send that plus 1 copy of your Mandatory Reconsideration letter to the address on the SSCS1 form.

 

You can either send in more information with that or wait until you get confirmation and a case number from the Tribunal Service and send it in later quoting that reference number.

 

Thing to note :- the DWP have decided that there is no Work Related Activity that would adversely effect people with Mental Health issues. Thus stopping anybody with mental health being awarded Support Group - its internal guidance which is not law so doesn't affect what the Tribunal panel will think. So you need to argue a Support Group descriptor and/or in one of your appeal points argue specifically why/how Work Related Activity would impact your life, worsen your condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...