Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Warning. Had render from The Wall Coating Company? Your insurance might be usless


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have you had render by the The Wall Coating Company (TWCC). Did you get a 20 year insurance policy for the work? Your insurance policy may be worthless.

 

I contracted with the The Wall Coating Company who (6 months and many many problems later) completed the work and sent a Guarantee certificate and an Insurance Policy Document. My insurance policy policy stated that contractor was WCC Systems Ltd.

 

The contract, work and payments are all to The Wall Coating Company, so who is WCC Systems Ltd? I have been told that The Wall Coating Company is a trading name of WCC Systems Ltd and they, but neither I, the broker and the Insurance company have any paperwork that shows that. The address and phone numbers for the Wall Coating Company are totally different to WCC Systems Ltd. I queried this with the Policy Broker and they confirmed that, because of the different names on the different paperwork, the Insurance Policy is (or could potentially be) invalid.

 

After some discussion, the broker will be sorting out he situation by amending the policy document to reflect that The Wall Coating Company is the trading name of WCC Systems Ltd.

 

So. Have you had render done by The Wall Coating Company (TWCC)? Take a close look at the part of the Insurance Policy Document which states who the Contractor is. If it says WCC Systems LTD and your guarantee certificate is by The Wall Coating Company, it may be invalid.

 

If anyone is thinking of contracting with The Wall Coating Company, be prepared for poor quality render (wonky, corners uneven, not level, not straight etc.) with the render dropped over your brand new windows and your paving slabs. Then be prepared for 6 months of trying to get the render to be put right. Eventually you may get hold of the Director Michael Richard ACKROYD who will deny any problems, accuse you of nit-picking and nagging and then threaten to send a team to remove the render from your walls.

Edited by captaincinders
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this.

 

We've had lots of trouble with wall rendering companies on this forum - https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=wall+rendering&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=wall%20rendering

 

Although it's gone rather quiet since the main operator and it all – Harvil Shaw – was banged up for about a couple of years – about a year or two ago. Maybe he's out now.

 

Have you got any idea who is it that runs TWCC? Where are they based?

 

Let me say that any lifetime guarantee which is offered by any company in respect of its work, is only as good as the lifetime of that company. The wall rendering companies which we have been hearing about on this forum typically lasted for a couple of years and then we folded and then mysteriously reemerged as something else with a similar name. In every one of these cases, the lifetime guarantee was useless.

 

We had quite a lot about some of these companies saying that their lifetime guarantees were insurance backed, but we have never come across anybody who checked up with the insurance to see if it was really in force and whether it would be really valid.

 

We tended to form the impression that there may not have been any insurance in place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doing a check on Michael Ackroyd and wall rendering turns up this:-

https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/director/18780951/michael-ackroyd

 

A succession of dissolved companies - each one in the same kind of business, dissolved 2 or three years apart.

 

Very much the same kind of pattern which we found with Harvil Shaw's companies.

 

I wonder if there is any connection between then or it might simply be a coincidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I think that you might be protected by https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300129/bis-14-693-consumer-protection-amendment-regulations-2014.pdf which I think give you a direct right of action – although I haven't looked at the regulations very carefully yet.

 

Incidentally, by making a single post in the way you have, it's pretty clear to me that you simply posted to do a hatchet job on this company without particularly looking for or expecting any help.

 

We very used to this kind of thing and it's not what we do here. If you want to discuss it and find solutions – then that's what we do

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Have you got any idea who is it that runs TWCC? Where are they based?"

 

Their address is N1 Buffalo Court, Salford Quays, Manchester. If you google the address you will find other companies including, Myhouse, Alldaypa, Matrix Student Living Ltd, The Protection Hut Ltd, Transworld, Check Ltd, Ripe Design Studios, J11 Ltd, Zorin Industries Ltd, Phat Professionals, etc etc. Basically it is not a real address, just a mail drop.

 

The same goes for the phone number. It goes to a secretary who tells you (no matter how may times you ring) that "no-one is available but someone will ring you back". It is just an answering service.

 

There is zero information about it on the web except one webpage. It is not a real company (despite its name), but I am told that it is a Trading Name for WCC Systems Ltd. I soon hope to have a document that actually says that because not a single document from TWCC nor any information on the web gives you that information.

 

"we have never come across anybody who checked up with the insurance to see if it was really in force and whether it would be really valid."

 

Fortunately I did. It is a real policy but it only comes into force if WCC Systems ltd goes out of business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this problem rings a 'bell' ....:lol::lol::lol:

 

I wonder if a certain guy might come and join us..............

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main concern was to warn people their 20 year insurance may not be valid and posted a solution. ( Check your policy and if there is an issue contact your broker who can amend the details to make it valid.) If this is the wrong place, do you have a suggestion where better to go to do that?

Edited by captaincinders
Link to post
Share on other sites

this problem rings a 'bell' ....:lol::lol::lol:

 

I wonder if a certain guy might come and join us..............

 

dx

 

Doubt Mr Bell will have any interest in this case however, Mr Ackroyd was a director of All Seasons Wall Systems who used to be the main contractor to Never Paint Again. That speaks volumes.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the issue with the insurance is simply a technical matter of the incorrect name being used when in fact it is acknowledged that the company in its alternative name is covered, then there is no issue because the FCA regulations – ICOBS make it unlawful to decline a claim on the basis of merely a technical defect.

 

If on the other hand this defect really does affect the validity of the insurance, then you would be protected by the Consumer (Protection from Unfair Trading) Regulations as amended which now confers a right of direct action upon an agrieved consumer.

 

I'm fully aware of what your main concern was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...